Summary Of Reaction To Safriet Article

1924 Words4 Pages

Reaction to Safriet Article In 2011, Barbara Safriet published an article “Federal options for maximizing the value of Advanced Practice Nurses in providing quality, cost-effective health care” from a legal perspective. The article focused on the benefits of utilizing Advance Practice Nurses to the full extent of their abilities as well as the current barriers that APNs encounter in their practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss two regulatory provisions to full deployment of APNs in current health care system, as well as three principle causes of current barriers to removal of the restrictive provisions for the APN. Furthermore, I will discuss the critical knowledge presented in the article and how it relates the APN practice. …show more content…

Colleagues and the public are unaware of the precise roles of the APN. Much of what the public knows about medicine is associated with a doctor, and the “doctor knows best” (Safriet, 2011). The public is unaware and confused about the different providers available to them and the services that they are capable of providing. When the public is unaware of the dysfunctions, then how could one expect things to change. Groups that restrict the practice of APNs are misinformed about the exact capabilities and roles of the APN. Physician and other healthcare professionals’ lack knowledge about the of APN 's scope-of-practice. Safriet mentioned Nurses can do much more than they may legally do. Burgener & Moore (2002) state that the outcome studies indicate that APNs care consistently results in positive client outcome and satisfaction. They further state that APNs have better interpersonal skills than physicians. A great deal of public education about the different roles has been effective. However, more work needs to be done. APNs should continue to vocalize and educate the public about the different roles and capabilities of the APN. It is difficult for APNs to advocate something that you do not quite understand …show more content…

It is essential to get out from underneath the collective “thumb” of the medical community. APNS can deliver care from a different perspective providing preventive care and health promotions. APNs are not planning to take over the practice of physicians; they are merely trying to provide quality health care to expanding needs of the public. APNs are capable of providing safe, cost-effective care that is comparable to that of a physician. The end picture should be to increase patient satisfaction, accessibility and provide competent care. A 2012 report by the National Governors Association, a bipartisan group of U.S. governors who aim to shape public policy, suggests nurse practitioners provide effective primary care. The APN community must be active participates in the full spectrum of health care and health care reform if we want to maintain our relevancy in the future. APNs scope of practice should commensurate with their training and education in all states, not only the state in which they reside. When deemed necessary, APNs will collaborate with other physicians as well as another specialist to achieve desirable outcomes. The collective health care system (physicians, APNs, Nursing, administrators and legislators) needs to recognize the urgency of the crises. There are many players involved including health care insurance, business,

Open Document