Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freedom of speech in a free society
Freedom of speech in a free society
Freedom of speech in a free society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freedom of speech in a free society
The Ten Commandments monument should be removed is because it was put there dishonestly. If the circumstances of this situation were different, in that case I would agree that the Ten Commandments monument should stay. Then I take into consideration how the monument ended up in the public courthouse, and I can see why it should be removed. Perhaps the monument should not go away where it will never be seen again, but taken to a place where it can be seen by anyone that wishes. At the beginning of this whole ordeal, I was right beside those who protested the removal of the monument. I thought about the First Amendment right: Freedom of Religion. Chief Justice Moore and his anonymous helpers took it upon themselves to put the monument there. But after I found out how the monument was placed there without consent of the court. This gave me one good reason why the monument should be moved. The next reason I think it should be moved is for the very reason that it is in a public courthouse. Yes, the first amendment does protect Freedom of Religion but whose religion? It doesn’t state any religion, whether the religion is Christianity, Buddhism, or paganism. Each and every one of us is entitled to the freedom of our own religion. This is a public courthouse where people of all religions come for justice. So another reason why it should be moved is because someone who comes to the courthouse might be offended by the Ten Commandments because they are of another religion. Also, they have to take into consideration the broad meaning of freedom of religion. So, let’s say the monument stays for the very reason of “Freedom of Religion”. Are Chief Justice Moore and his accomplices going to be okay with someone of the atheist religion sneaking into the courthouse one night and making a display of his religion? This would have to be okay because everyone is entitled to their right to freedom of religion. Before we know what is happening we will have monuments and displays everywhere. This is another reason why the monument should be moved because if it is okay this one time, then where does it stop. I‘m not saying that this monument should be taken away and destroyed, I‘m saying that these people who want it on display should spend less time protesting and more time raising money to have a place built for their precious monument.
"Freedom of Religion: Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association" provided a great example dealing with the freedom of religion. The Indians had been living on that land for hundreds of years, yet were denied their attempts to declare the area as a sacred area to prevent building on the lands. In the end it was a bittersweet victory for the Indians because the G-O Road was ordered to remain uncompleted because of the environment and not because it was a sacred territory for Indians. I believe that the Indians should have won the case in the Supreme Court because they were protected by the First Amendment. The case shouldn't have lasted as long as it did.
Free speech and the First Amendment rights do not give people lisence to desecrate a symbol of pride and freedom. It is not all right to protect those who let it burn, lighting up the sky with their hatred. It definitely is not acceptable to insult the men and women who fight every day to protect this nation by burning the symbol of their labors. Therefore, it is crucial that the Supreme Court pass the amendment to the Constitution to protect the flag of the US.
Taking the statues down is like ignoring standing up for what you believe in and death by war. A quote from “Monumental Battle” states, “‘But many of those who support keeping the monument say their motive are about honor not race.’” This quote shows that not all who support the statues agree with slavery. Some don’t want them to come down because it’s honoring all who fought for what they believe. Others might argue that even though those people lost their lives for what they believe in, slaves lost their lives from working to hard or starvation. I would argue against that by saying, in school students are taught to stand up for what they believe in, if we take the statues down that’s saying don’t stand up for what you believe in; if you do, nothing comes from it. In other words, if we are able to take down statues of people who stand up for what they believe in, then that’s like taking down a statue of Lincoln, He stood up for what he believed in, no slavery; just like, for example, General Robert E. Lee, stood for
All throughout history, the world has seen the affects of great men who have made it their life’s goal to further the word of God. There have been pastors who travel all around their nation preaching at every church they can find. There have been pastors who have had to hold services in secret or else be imprisoned for the rest of their lives. There have been missionaries who have risked their lives to bring the gospel to the most remote places of the world. There have been astounding Christian authors, who have written some of the most compelling books to ever hit the best-seller list. However, there is a man who has taken part in all of these extraordinary tasks; a man whose entire life revolved around the Bible. Not only was he known in his hometown of Bedford, London but in all of Europe and all throughout Asia. (In fact, one of his books sold 200,000 copies in the first three days in China alone (Sadler).) This man, John Bunyan, has influenced the lives of many people all over the world. In fact, John Bunyan’s life, works, and struggles have proven to be some of the most influential in Christian history to this point; his writings have also pioneered the way for theological allegories.
Monuments give people that have accomplished a significant thing credibility in what they have done. In many cases those people have done something heroic and extraordinary to achieve a monument in their name and honor. If you were to do something heroic and special wouldn’t you want to get a monument granted in your honor? Sometimes monuments aren’t just to honor those who have done something, but maybe someone who had passed away. Maybe they died in a tragic accident and their family wanted to honor their life in a memorable way. Monuments are extremely valuable and important in our nation. The Fort Amanda Park located right here in Lima, Ohio has a significant historic past. During the 1812 war, General William Harrison called most of the
This, in fact, would be the most proper and effective way to handle the situation. It is the better alternative to removing these statues forever and essentially trashing them out. Museums are meant for people to learn about history, and having these statues will allow people to become more educated about the significance of them and the reasoning for them. People who oppose removing the statues concern about how it will “whitewash” and erase history; however, moving them to museums also resolves this issue. It is important to preserve history and putting the statues into museums will surely do that because of the role of museums: to educate people about history. In addition, statues of Robert E. Lee should be removed because of who he was. Lee, like many other people at the time, were slave owners. Not only was he a slave owner, but he was furthermore a cruel and harsh owner, as he often severely beat his slaves. One slave said that Lee was “one of the meanest men she had ever met” (Contreras). A popular counter argument to that is George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were also slave owners, so we should remove their memorials
word here is obey, we need to keep our side of the covenant and follow
It is my individual conviction that no association ought to be influenced by religious belief. My feeling is that the legislature should not to have changed our Pledge of Allegiance in such a way, to the point that would conflict with what our country has conveyed about it at is begun. The reason the Pledge has been adjusted is on the grounds that in the United States, there exists a strong Judeo-Christian custom that has ruled the political circle. It has exchanged into a standard for essentially anybody chose to an open office to be an expert of one of the major Judeo-Christian faiths, and that fall outside distinctive religions ring atoll is generally seen offended by those as a rule society's eye. Religion is a convincing social establishment in the United States, and the individuals who hunt down must subscribe them to the organizing religion to obtain that high
This monument preserves history and the remembrance of those who are often forgotten which essentially is what monuments need to achieve. Those who moderately criticized this monument definitely have more opposition for the Columbus monument based on the fact not even an attempt at honoring the Native Americans is presented in the monument in Easton. The Easton monument has much more faulty representation of history than The Crazy Horse despite its minor limitations of characterizing a leader that has never been photographed (Downes). However, most of these limitation are made up for when viewing the full impact this memorial can have on future generations where people are becoming aware of American history instead of ignoring some of its realities. The Crazy Horse memorial allows people to end this trend of forgetting those who loved this country first and matter the most. The group that chose to create the Columbus monument did not consider the effects Columbus’s history with Native Americans would later have in surrounding and distant
...ll rights the Constitution provides. A woman has destroyed a display of an angel falling into the pits of hell in Florida because she thought it was “not right.” This woman wa a Catholic. People were not mainly upset on the fact that his women vandalized a display but the process people had to go through just to get access to having the display. "The state can 't give itself the authority to decide whether certain religious messages are 'offensive ' — it needs to allow everyone 's speech or no one 's speech.” (Christian post).
This is a statue of a man who literally fought for the subjagation of slaves, who in case you might have forgotten, served for their entire lives. This statue is not art. This is also only one of over a thousand commemorations of Confederacy. They were not put up last week or last year; they were erected over a hundred years ago to serve as a message that acts as a reminder in regards to who reigns supreme. I'm not sure how else I can spell it out for you, but these "necessary historical structures" are tangible, physical, real-life etchings of white supremacy into the very land we consider free. They go beyond a mere historical purpose in that they represent Jim crow, lynch mobs, disenfranchisement, and all of the racial suffering black people
The longevity of the monument is important as well. Monuments are structures that pay homage to great historical figures and moments and deserve to be immortalized to show their significance to future generations. The stone statue memorial of Crazy Horse, the great Sioux leader, is being built a few miles from Mount Rushmore. Even though the Sioux people were once close to being completely erased, the “effort to honor the memory of the people” will not be erased so easily. This monument in the mountain is an impressive sight, and even though a day may come when most human creations are worn away with time, the monument of Crazy Horse will still stand tall with “his eyes ablaze” and “his long arm pointing out over his beloved Black Hills.” (C) Yet not all historical sites have the luxury of preservation. The Savannah Memorial Park could possibly be moved in order for new development to be built because the association in charge of the site does not have enough money to keep it running. Even though “Savannah is rich in history and should be preserved,” the association cannot attain historical landmark status with the state because it would not have enough resources to make it work. So when creating a monument, it is important to take into consideration the care and resources needed to preserve these sites so that they can be long lasting and seen by future generations as
I think the next monument should be a person that caused a spark in history. Old innovations are so important today because we have the opportunity to improve and build off that idea. I believe a monument of Henry Ford should be made in the National Mall mostly because of his success story. Henry Ford was a young entrepreneur who was told, he wouldn't last more than six months in business. He proved them wrong by becoming one of the wealthiest people in the world.
What offends us now is so routinely redefined that probably no statue now will survive more than a generation before it becomes offensive to someone who will demand its removal. The current battle actually goes back to a mass shooting in 2015, when self-described white supremacist Dylann Roof shot and killed nine people in a predominantly black church in Charleston, South Carolina. Roof drew a lot of attention for posing with the Confederate flag in images that came out after the shooting — and that helped spur a fight within South Carolina about whether it should take down a Confederate flag that had flown at the state capitol for years. Of course, many people disagree that this is about erasing white history. They argue that these monuments were built originally to honor the Confederacy and the racism and white supremacy that it stood
Some consideration should also be given to the Japanese misgivings. They for example say that the monument perpetuates a one-dimensional perspective of Japanese Americans as distinctly “un-American” in thought. In essence, it perpetuates an “us vs. them mentality”. A clear example of this is how American values are extolled by maidens such as Lady Liberty but Japanese culture in the region will only be defined by a war crime cast in bronze. The message of the statue is a clear symbol of Japanese harshness and oppression. This version of events ignores the thousands of faithful Japanese Americans who remained loyal to the U.S. throughout the war. Moreover, it hypocritically ignores how Americans captured thousands of Japanese families and placed them within internment camps. This statue in a sense highlights the convoluted and often egotistical display of American values. For example, it displays Asian women in the same similar manner of submission used to characterize Indians and African Americans. This plays into the American narrative of being the mightiest advocators of liberty. This statue though notably refuses to acknowledge how America itself went astray as a nation. History is careful to tell the truth optimistically from the point of view that is most