Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical accuracy of the patriot
Summary of the patriot movie
What might have caused the historical inaccuracies of the movie the patriot
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical accuracy of the patriot
Patriot Cultural Assignment
“The Patriot” is an excellent movie. It may very well be one of the most exciting
and moving war-drama movies of all time. There are very few films today that even come
close to touching upon the American Revolution, which is why “The Patriot” is of such
importance. Nonetheless, during the film the actual American Revolution takes a back
seat and allows the center of the story to revolve around Benjamin Martin (played by
Mel Gibson) and his South Carolina family. Some examples of this would be the focus on
Benjamin’s eldest son Gabriel and how he goes against his father’s wishes. As well as
Gabriel, the film focuses on Benjamin and what actions he takes and why. Aside
from the focus on the Martin family, there was inaccuracy at times about the American
Revolutionary War itself.
“The Patriot” should have been more focused on the actual American Revolution
than on the story line concerning Benjamin Martin and his family. Instead of doing this,
the movie focuses on Benjamin’s eldest son Gabriel who was eager to get in on the action,
and signs up with the rebel forces against his father’s wishes just minutes after South
Carolina joins the fight against the British. As the focus on Gabriel continues, he soon
romances a local girl in a small town he passes through. He later falls in love with the girl
and they begin writing to each other while he is away. When Ga...
1776 by David McCullough is a non-fiction historical book that historically accounts an in depth view of The American Revolution. The book starts from late 1775 and spans to the end of 1776. The book includes the Battle of New York, the Battle of Brooklyn, the Battle of Boston, the Battle of Fort Washington, the Battle of Bunker Hill, and the ending Battle of Trenton in 1776. David McCullough adds a sense of emotion and color to this book where it 's more than a history book that lists facts. Not only does he add a sense of enjoyment to read, 1776 provides detailed accounts of the military life during the end of 1775 to the end of 1776 and detailed accounts of the battles. The author, David McCullough, is trying to make a point that 1776 is
The book opens with a Confederate spy as he made his way through the Union lines on the night of June 29, 1863 toward Confederate General Robert E. Lee bearing news of the Army of the Potomac as they crossed paths in the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The days after follow the various Union and Confederate regiments as they regained their wits about them after the previous Battles of Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville. Marching onward toward Gettysburg, where the most deciding battle of the Civil War would take place.
David McCullough author of 1776 puts faces and feelings to the events of the Revolutionary war making this an exciting novel even when the ending is known. Acting as a companion to an earlier work of McCullough’s, John Adams, 1776 is a strictly military view of the era versus political. Although the reader may have to get accustomed to the vast amount of characters introduced McCullough makes sure that those you are supposed to remember you will. Every character introduced is described incredibly well and throughout the novel you begin to feel as if you know the character and are going through the battle with them, specifically General George Washington with whom the reader emphasizes constantly with throughout the war. With the great description of the characters and events we feel as if we are there and in doing this the author creates understanding, the reader by knowing all sides and characters’ personalities the feels they know why the Revolution happened the way it did.
Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers to the United States, was not a patriot but a mere loyalist to England before the dissolution between England and the colonies occurred. Sheila L. Skemp's The Making of a Patriot explores how Benjamin Franklin tried to stay loyal to the crown while taking interest in the colonies perception and their own representation in Parliament. While Ms. Skemp alludes to Franklin's loyalty, her main illustration is how the attack by Alexander Wedderburn during the Privy Council led to Franklin's disillusionment with the British crown and the greater interest in making the Thirteen Colonies their own nation. Her analysis of Franklin's history in Parliament and what occurred on the night that the council convened proves the change behind Franklin's beliefs and what lead to his involvement in the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution.
He reviewed American Insurgents, American Patriots. In his review, Dierks saw the emotion of rage as the theme throughout the book (scholarworks.iu.edu). In the second paragraph of the review, he states, “only rage can explain the inexorable march toward war,” following this he makes a reference to another scholarly piece by T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence (2004). In that book, Dr. Breen explains the joining of the American Colonies because of the boycotts against England. Dierks sees American Insurgents, American Patriots as a follow up to Breen’s 2004 novel which, instead of focusing on the unification of the colonies, focuses on the unification of the people to rise up and fight The British Crown (scholarworks.iu.edu). Dierks does not mention how the idea of the colonies coming together because of the economic factor and the boycotts against England were discussed throughout American Insurgents, American Patriots and makes it appear as if the book solely focuses on the rage and violence of the colonists. He does point out that most scholars credit The Founding Fathers and their “genius” for the cause and success of The American Revolution (scholarworks.iu.edu). He agrees that this book gives credit for the revolution to the rural colonists and the average people, stating that their violence was more effective than political savvy of the colonial elite. He ends his review with saying Breen’s final thoughts are optimistic and pleasant saying the revolution was a “political triumph—independence first declared by force of words and then defended by force of arms”
The third main relationship is Hasidism verses Zionism. The relationship between the two fathers and the two sons is a very important theme in this book. Because of their different backgrounds, Reb Saunders and David Malters approached raising a child from two totally different perspectives. Despite the obvious differences in the two men’s beliefs, both did what they thought was right for their sons. Reb Saunders was a Hasidic tzaddik and wanted his son to follow in his footsteps.
The Revolutionary war, sparked by the colonist’s anger towards taxation without representation, was a conflict between the United States and its mother country Great Britain. This event had been considered the most significant event in the American history. It separated the thirteen colonies from the tyrannical ruling of King George. The revolutionary war was not a big war, “The military conflict was, by the standards of later wars, a relatively modest one. Battle deaths on the American side totaled fewer than 5,000”1. However, the war proved that the thirteen colonies were capable of defeating the powerful Great Britain. Over the years there were many Hollywood films made based on the revolutionary war, 1776, Revolution, Johnny Tremain, and The Patriot. But, no movie has stirred up as much controversy as the Mel Gibbson movie The Patriot. The patriot is very entertaining but it is historically inaccurate. Too much Hollywood “spices” was added to the movie for viewing pleasures.
This movie was inspiring and encouraging to anyone who is struggling with something. Overcoming his controversies in life became the main point of the movie. Knowing that this movie was based upon a true story inspires the people even more.
Some of the older boys from the nearby farms are joining up. I think if you want to fight you have to be at least fourteen, but my friend Tommy told me you could join as young as seven if you were a drummer boy. John and Timmy are seven and six, so I better not tell them that. Charlie and William and Tommy are all joining up together. Their fathers let them, since they’re all at least sixteen. I do hope they come home again. “You never know what could happen in a war,” Mother says. I believe her.
loyal to himself instead of his father. He warns a man named Major de Spain about his
Washington was not going to accept reprehensible defeat, so he had decided on a counterattack where Charles Cornwallis was residing with his troops – in Germantown. Though the American army had lost at Brandywine, it soon after g...
The regiment marches for several days until they are finally faced with a real engagement by the enemy ( confederate soldiers). Henry is surrounded by his fellow union soldiers, so he begins to fire his gun as the other members of the regiments but ultimately he scared in the midst of battle. Eventually the union soldiers prevail over the confederate soldiers as the victors and begin to congratulate one another, shortly after Henry decides to take a nap. Henry is awaken by the sound of the confederate soldiers attacking his regiment and fear ceases him and causes him to run away from the battle. While walking across the fields Henry tries to reason with himself and convince himself that there was no way that his regiment could have won so he was right to run away and save himself, because staying would have been like committing suicide. After a while Henry encounters a commander talking to a general and overhears that his regiment was able to hold back the confederate charge. This comment further depresses Henry but he still tries to console himself by holding on to the belief that all he did was preserve himself.
One night, on March 5, 1770, a street fight occurred between a group of American patriots and some British soldiers stationed in Boston. The Americans harassed the troops by yelling and shouting names at them and throwing snowballs and sticks. A crowd formed and in the noise and confusion, weapons were fired. In the end, ...
Ben is one of the main characters in the movie. It all started with the class going to a
... historical significance of this film. When the film was made, it might have been considered a risk to cast Matthew Broderick as a valiant civil war leader. His past performances included childhood roles in movies such as Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, War Games, and Project X. In his first feature role as a serious actor, Broderick is believable and has just the right amount of emotion and dramatic resonance. Morgan Freeman is also well-cast as the patriarch of the group soldiers. His calm, yet powerful soliloquies of life as a hopeful slave painted many of the films non-battle scenes.