philosophy

717 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Flaws in utilitarianism

Does the principle of utility provide an adequate basis for justice? Would it, for instance, sanction the punishment of an innocent person under certain circumstances? (Explain the theory of utilitarianism and consider a situation that might test its validity.)

The principle of utility has evolved from an individual perspective to the general population. Jeremy Bentham, arguably the founder of utilitarianism, leaned towards hedoism and believed pleasure is the only intrinsic good and we should make choices based on the amount of pleasure we will receive. He was most interested in this concept on an individual level. The amount of pleasure or satisfaction we receive and pain or suffering we avoid from an action is the amount of utility it is determined to have. Bentham went so far as to invent hedonic calculus, which considers factors such as intensity, duration, certainty, remoteness, fecundity, amount of people affected, etc to determine an act's amount of utility. John Stewart Mill tried to counteract problems from Bentham's theory by using the greatest happiness principle which, “is not the agent's own greatest happiness, but the greatest amount of happiness altogether”. Mill dived deeper into which kind of pleasure is better and determined that you have to take the word of people who have experienced a myriad of different pleasures and observe what they choose after experiencing all of them. While utilitarianism may seem feasible in theory, it doesn't take into account personal integrity, the longterm affects of an action..... making it impractical for society to adopt.
Identifying specific situations help us understand the problems associated with utilitarianism. Consider this scenario. David is a sheriff in an small t...

... middle of paper ...

... rebels wanted to know in only a few seconds what David's decision was, how could he weigh out every option and determine what is rationally the greater good? If utilitarianism was to be embraced by society, standards would have to be set in order to apply to these situations. Not everything can be measured by the same standard. Happiness is complicated and can be influenced by many different factors. How do we determine the aggregate, or overall, happiness of the members of a society? This would seem to present a real problem. For happiness is not, like temperature or weight, directly measurable by any means that we have available. So utilitarians must approach the matter indirectly. They will have to rely on indirect measures, in other words. These rules would be ones that in general are known to reliably produce the most amount of happiness. For instance, from

Show More
Related

  • Robert Nozick's Experiment, The Experience Machine and the Inclusion of Meta-Pleasure

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory that seeks to define right and wrong actions based solely on the consequences they produce. By utilitarian standards, an act is determined to be right if and only if it produces the greatest total amount of happiness for everyone. Happiness (or utility) is defined as the amount of pleasure less the amount of pain (Mill, 172). In order to act in accordance with utilitarianism, the agent must not only impartially attend to the pleasure of everyone, but they must also do so universally, meaning that everyone in the world is factored into the morality of the action.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Hospers And Rule Utilitarianism

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory that states that an action is considered right as long as it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This theory was first proposed by Jeremy Bentham and later was refined by J.S Mill. Mill differs from Bentham by introducing a qualitative view on pleasure and makes a distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. John Hospers critiques utilitarianism and shows that rule utilitarianism under more specific and stricter rules would promote utility better. Bernard Williams believes that utilitarianism is too demanding from people and instead believes virtue ethics is a better solution. Williams seems to have only considered act utilitarianism instead of rule utilitarianism, which may have better responses to the problems proposed by Williams. Sterling Hardwood purposes eleven objections to utilitarianism which can be used to help make compromise between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. I will argue that rule utilitarianism can be formed in such a way that it avoids the problems that arise from Williams, and Hardwood.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill Vs Kierkegaard Essay

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mill grew up under the influences from his father and Bentham. In his twenties, an indication of the cerebral approach of the early Utilitarians led to Mill’s nervous breakdown. He was influential in the growth of the moral theory of Utilitarianism whose goal was to maximize the personal freedom and happiness of every individual. Mill's principle of utility is that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”. Utilitarianism is the concept that a man should judge everything based on the ability to promote happiness for the greatest number of individual. He believes that Utilitarianism must show how the conversion can be made from an interest in one’s own particular bliss to that of others. John Stuart Mill also states that moral action should not be judged on the individual case but more along the lines of “rule of thumb” and says that individuals ought to measure the outcomes and settle on their choices in view of the consequence and result that advantages the most people. Mill believes that pleasure is the only wanted consequence. Mill supposes that people are gifted with the capacity for conscious thought, and they are not happy with physical delights, but rather endeavor to accomplish the joy of the psyche too. He asserts that individuals want pleasure and reject

    Read More

  • Summary Of Bernard Williams Critique Of Utilitarianism

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bernard Williams' "Critique of Utilitarianism" focuses on posing objections to and looking at philosophical problems of utilitarianism. According to utilitarian theory, actions can only be made if they produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. Williams believes that this factor cannot be the only consideration in making decisions, like utilitarianism claims it is. He uses an example in his text to illustrate and better explain his objections to the theory, which will be further discussed in this paper.

    Read More

  • On Utilitarianism

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill gives an account for the reasons one must abide by the principles of Utilitarianism. Also referred to as the Greatest-happiness Principle, this doctrine promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, holding that the right act is that which yields the greatest net utility, or "the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain", for all individuals affected by said act (Joyce, lecture notes from 03/30).

    Read More

  • Mill's Utilitarianism

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle. It states that, "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure" (Mill, 1863, Ch. 2, p330). In other words, it results with the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people that are involved.

    Read More

  • The Dark Knight: Utilitarianism Or Deontology?

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, had thoughts of the Principle of Utility and what it should be like. Bentham believes that the Principle of Utility depends on pain and pleasure and Mill believes that the Principle of Utility depends on higher pleasures and lower pleasures. Pain meaning evil and pleasure meaning good or greater benefits and higher pleasures meaning that action was good which would lead to a higher level of happiness and lower pleasures meaning bad which would lead to a decreasing level of happiness. Therefore, a normative ethical theory that has come through from this and it is Utilitarianism. The definition of Utilitarianism is a course of action that maximizes the total

    Read More

  • Analysis of Aldous Huxley's A Brave New World

    761 Words  | 2 Pages

    An argument in support of utilitarianism follows the three basic propositions of utilitarianism which are: "(a) Actions are to be judged... by virtue of their consequences ... (b) consequences... [are based on] the amount of happiness or unhappiness created ... (c) each person's happiness counts the same" (R...

    Read More

  • The Greatest Happiness Principle

    1362 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper I will present and critically assess the concept of the principle of utility as given by John Stuart Mill. In the essay “What Utilitarianism Is” #, Mill presents the theory of Utilitarianism, which he summarizes in his “utility” or “greatest happiness principle” # (Mill 89). Mill’s focus is based on an action’s resulting “happiness,” # pleasure and absences of pain, or “unhappiness,” # discomfort and the nonexistence of contentment, rather than the intentions involved (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill’s principle, I will then end this essay by discussing my personal opinion about the doctrine and how I believe it can be altered to better suit real-life situations.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism in Government

    1664 Words  | 4 Pages

    For the purposes of brevity I will refer mainly to Bentham's and Mill's definitions of utilitarianism. In ...

    Read More

  • Why Is Prostitution Ethical

    2236 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ethical theory of utilitarianism is associated with the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism essentially is the theory that good is what causes a person pleasure and evil is what causes a person pain. Bentham’s utilitarianism is sometimes titled Act Utilitarianism because it focuses on individual actions A “right” action, according to Betham, is one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Where a “wrong” action is one that would cause more pain than pleasure. Before a person commits an action, they should look at the consequences that it can have on the individual and others. Hedonic Calculus is a method in determining how much pleasure or pain an action will elicit. Hedonic Calculus consists of seven criteria including intensity, duration, certainty, propinquity, fecundity, purity and extent. Each criteria can be given a score between -10 (worst pain) to +10 (highest pleasure). The action becomes ethical and moral if there is an overall net happiness for everyone that is affected. An acti...

    Read More

  • How Does Utilitarianism Benefit The Greater Good?

    1526 Words  | 4 Pages

    Happiness is the ultimate goal in life. Utilitarianism is simple, it claims that an action is morally right if and only if doing the action maximizes pleasure. An action is morally wrong if it fails to maximize pleasure. it help people, and morally wrong actions harm people You make people happy when you help them and you make them unhappy when you harm them. In this paper, I will show that Utilitarianism is a true ethical theory because it (benefits the greater good) is encompasses all beings in society, is impartial (nonpartisan). First I will explain why Utilitarianism promotes the greatest pleasure for the most people. Next, I will set out to explain how Utilitarianism would help with societal issues we are facing . Then, I will consider the best objection to Utilitarianism as to a lack of self interest and self good and give my reply.-morally repungnant-

    Read More

  • Critique Of Bentham's Quantitative Utilitarianism

    1762 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over time, the actions of mankind have been the victim of two vague labels, right and wrong. The criteria for these labels are not clearly defined, but they still seem to be the standard by which the actions of man are judged. There are some people that abide by a deontological view when it comes to judging the nature of actions; the deontological view holds that it is a person's intention that makes an action right or wrong. On the other hand there is the teleological view which holds that it is the result of an action is what makes that act right or wrong. In this essay I will be dealing with utilitarianism, a philosophical principle that holds a teleological view when it comes the nature of actions. To solely discuss utilitarianism is much too broad of topic and must be broken down, so I will discuss specifically quantitative utilitarianism as presented by Jeremy Bentham. In this essay I will present the argument of Bentham supporting his respective form of utilitarianism and I will give my critique of this argument along the way.

    Read More

  • Should There Be Utilitarians Be Hedonists?

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism thus seeks to maximise utility for all who could be affected by an action. As to what constitutes ‘utility,’ hedonism argues that pleasure is the sole value that should be maximised, being the one intrinsic good. It is valuable for itself and the only value that can be simultaneously objective and unbiased by prejudice, religious views, and traditional notions of right and wrong. Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus supports the concept that pleasures can be weighed up against each other to minimise pain and promote pleasure. This forms the classical utilitarianism of Bentham and Mill, which has a hedonistic nature.

    Read More

  • Deterrence Theory Of Punishment Research Paper

    809 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jeremy Bentham developed the “principle of utility” (Bentham, 6), which later became the “greatest happiness principle” (Bentham, 6) under philosopher John Stuart Mill. With this principle Bentham identified an ideology that focused on “utility producing benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness in order to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness” (Bentham, 7). The importance of happiness in a community is the foundation upon which my argument rests. Building on this concept, philosopher John Stuart Mill developed utilitarianism further, holding “that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong in proportion as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is meant pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness is meant pain and the lack of pleasure” (Mill, 5). Mill’s advance in the theory provides the distinction between higher mental pleasures and lower sensual

    Read More

More about philosophy

Open Document