Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle's view on happiness
Meaning of life an essay
What is happiness, according to Aristotle? essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle's view on happiness
In the second section of this paper I will discuss how to live a happy life. I will show you the type of person who lives a happy life and discuss the traits and qualities that a happy person embodies. In my opinion, someone who is happy lives a life close to Susan Wolf’s essay Meaning in Life and Why it Matters with a little bit of Aristotle.
According to Wolf, there are two significant views in order for people to live a meaningful life. The first view she says that people must do something that they love. The second view is that you have to pursue something worthy of love. The two views together is what shapes Wolf’s view and my view of a way to a happy and meaningful life. The first view of doing something that you get pleasure from is the subjective view. You need to gain pleasure out of your life in order to be happy. The loved object must be of something “larger than oneself.” This is the objective view that you can receive objective meaning from it. This objective meaning is that there must be a worth which is felt by other people than you. Wolf brings these two ideas together in what I think is one of the main ideas of her work. “One might paraphrase this by saying that, according to my conception, meaning arises when subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness” (Wolf, pg. 9).
I think that we must also look at Aristotle in order to gain a full understanding of how to be happy. Aristotle believe that you must show appropriate virtue towards pleasure and pain. This boils down to that you must do the right thing in a given situation. You can create your happiness
This account of happiness is the better than the other accounts of happiness. If we look at the other philosophers they account for self-interest and ...
... middle of paper ...
...’s driveway across the road. An inappropriate pursuit of happiness would be becoming happy over someone else’s pain or suffering. I think this would lead to unhappiness because I don’t think becoming happy over someone else’s pain fits into morality, self-interest, or love.
In conclusion, in order to be happy one needs to find a passion that they love. This passion needs to worthy of love. This passion should, however, be appropriate and something that would be looked at as meaningful by other people. It is very important that this account of happiness has the factor of doing things for love, because that is an important reason for doing things that can’t be explained in any other way. A happy person will not compare their own life to that of other people and judge which is better. This person will live their life the best way they know how in an appropriate way.
According to Wolf, all meaningful lives have both a subjective and an objective aspect to them. These basics can make lives important only together. The general idea is that a person’s projects and activities in the end make his or her life meaningful,
Before we look into specifics, we’ll examine the history and development of “happiness” as a philosophy. Of course, the emotion of happiness has always existed, but it began to be seriously contemplated around 2,500 years ago by philosophers like Confucius, Buddha, Socrates and Aristotle. Shortly after Buddha taught his followers his Noble Eight Fold Path (which we will talk about later), Aristotle was teaching that happiness is “dependent on the individual” (Aristotle).
...ust be happiness. Furthermore, he asserts that since we must start from our own experience, we must be brought up in fine habits to be more easily capable of fine things. Chapter five elaborates on this point, proposing that people reach their interpretations of happiness according to the kinds of lives they lead. Three kinds of lives are introduced. The first is of the many, who see happiness as pleasure, and this concept is dismissed as vulgar and only suitable for animals. Second is the cultivated, who are active in politics and see happiness as having honour. However, this too is dismissed as superficial, as being honoured depends on others opinions. The cause of honour, virtue, is considered as well, but also dismissed as possessing virtue does not equate to happiness. Third is the life of study, which is postponed, perhaps for another book in this work.
In order to achieve happiness, one should do what makes them happy such as trying to make their dream come true or spending time with their loved ones. The main character Santiago from “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho, obtained happiness by following his dream and finding new companionship during his journey. Furthermore in the article “In the Pursuit of Unhappiness” by Darrin Mcmahon describes some things people do in order to be happy. Despite the high expectations to achieve happiness, one should follow their dreams and be with the ones you love.
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
Happiness is a goal every human pursues, yet the ways in which it is pursued differs amongst people. Some believe prosperity will bring them happiness. Others believe material, power, fame, success, or love will bring them happiness. No matter what one believes is the right way to conquer this goal, every person will take their own unique path in an attempt to find it. But what is happiness? Happiness is often viewed as a subjective state of mind in which one may say they are happy when they are on vacation with friends, spending time with their family, or having a cold beer on the weekend while basking in the sun. However, Aristotle and the Stoics define happiness much differently. In Aristotle’s
Everyone have different ways in achieving happiness. The science of happiness, is a subject that generates a great deal of debate. Yet the pursuit of happiness is more about how people deals with their surroundings. Moreover, others have discovered that happiness is relates to positive behavior in which people do in everyday life. In the book, The Happiness Advantage, by Shawn Achor, he discusses the theory that people need to pursuit happiness before they want to become success. In addition, the author presents some ideas that relate to people actions when dealing with certain problems. Therefore, the idea of behavior that people conduct in daily life is an important element to a happy life, and this is the subject of this investigation.
Happiness is defined as a “state of being happy”. This concept of happiness seems rather simple to the ordinary person. According to Aristotle and Immanuel Kant, happiness is not merely a state. In fact, there is a lot more substance within the dimension of happiness that one must acquire and comprehend to achieve. While Aristotle defines happiness as the final end and self sufficient (8), Kant does not. Instead, Kant emphasizes the kingdom of ends, in which all are subject to the categorical imperative as rational autonomous beings with the intention of universalizing one’s maxim, not happiness. This paper will explore Aristotle’s definition of happiness in comparison to Kant’s.
As a person in any society, you are told, “This will make you happy,” “This will not.” The inconsistency with this is that each culture views fulfillment differently. Cultures based on doing good and helping humanity view joy as mutually respecting one another and turning away from temptation. In cultures that do not set a precedent on being kind to your fellow man view selfish desires, such as sexual pleasure, monetary success, and pride, as the way to fulfillment. In Sappho Poems and Confucius Analects, these disparities are obvious.
The pursuit for happiness has been a quest for man throughout the ages. In his ethics, Aristotle argues that happiness is the only thing that the rational man desires for its own sake, thus, making it good and natural. Although he lists three types of life for man, enjoyment, statesman, and contemplative, it is the philosopher whom is happiest of all due to his understanding and appreciation of reason. Aristotle’s version of happiness is not perceived to include wealth, honor, or trivial
Bowman, James. "The Pursuit of Happiness." The American Spectator. N.p., Sept. 2010. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
He stated that “happiness is a life of virtuous activity in accordance with reason”. (Aristotle). The importance of this quote is happiness can neither be gained or lose in a few hours. It is a value of your life measuring up to your full potential as a human being. Aristotle reveals that you should not announce your happiness has been lived until your life has come to an end. It does not just take one day to fulfil happiness it takes time. The secret to achieving most of your happiness is having a good personality. Developing a good personality will require strong effort, you have to wat happiness for all the right reasons. For instance, being addicted to drugs. This is top issue in the world today that is often mistaken as a pain reliever and a way of happiness, but once it’s out of the system everything comes back. We cannot try to substitute real happiness for the knock off brand. Happiness comes from within and help from family. Friends, and
Throughout my life, I have learned to see that happiness is not such an inaccessible dream. Although its notion varies from one person to another, happiness is often times only one inch away. Some people will experience happiness in the pursuit of it. Some will find it in sacrificing themselves for greater goals. Others will find it in people’s company, in lust or in drugs. There is no recipe for success or happiness, and it is only up to us to define what we want from life, and how we want to get it. The only certain thing is that it is never too late for anybody to achieve their dreams, to make peace with their feelings, and ultimately, to be happy.
But in this debate, one question still raises its head - What is happiness? Happiness is not actually leading a luxurious life, but the luxury of living a life. Happiness is not actually about expanding your business, but it lies in expanding the horizons of life. Happiness is not having a meal in the most famous restaurant, but having it with your most beloved family. It does not lie in attending honorable parties, but to attend a party with honor.
Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...