Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative and positive impact of high population growth on the environment
Impact of overpopulation
A short note on Effects of Overpopulation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Alhasn Otaif
Ms. L.NewSome
Writing 4A
March28,2014
Increasing in the Population
Issitt, MicahWarhol, Tom. "Counterpoint: Controlling Population Growth Is Essential." Points Of View: Population Growth (2013): 3. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
The population grows quickly approximately 9 billion. The article showed the people will not be able to get enough sources if the overpopulation continue. We have to control the population. The UN stated that the population will be 70 million persons every year and in 2050 will be more than 9 billion. Also the population reached the highest level in 1987 and was 87 million. So the scientists warned it will be environmental and social problems. For example, the people will fight each other to get the resources. We must try to lease or decreasing the population by any type of controlling like to organize the reproduction or build a system that makes population under the controlling especially in China. That is going to preserve the limited resources more time.
The article was presenting some information about the population issue from the points of views from the library of Texas A&M CC by Micah L. Issitt who is working as freelance writer/researcher and Tom Warhol who is working as Marketing and Development Coordinator. On the other hand, the author was objective, critical and kind of angry about the issue. Because he appeared to stand to stop the issue and gives plan to control it. In addition, he was biased to be worth eliminating this issue. In general, all the information that came in the article was reliable in my point of view and well researched, because it’s from the UN. Some of it was current according to the UN like2013 and the other was old ...
... middle of paper ...
...anet. the United Nations stated that the population is going to reach more six billion. We have to decrease our trash of food because there are a lot of people need it.
The article is from USA Today Magazine. It`s popular magazine. And there was no specific writer appearing in the source.The author was praising in the agricultural to get the benefits from and it’s a good solution for many problems. He was subjective and try to persuade the readers to pay attention for agricultural. Furthermore, he was biased because he is kind of pushing the people forward to the agricultural. All the information was appearing as well-researched because the author used information from the United Nation. Also, it’s current because its since 2011 and reliable. Finally, it's not related with my topic exactly because the article focused on the agricultural more than overpopulation.
However, the good is outweighed by the bad in that this article has almost no factual support. Worley seems to be venting her thoughts without any outside factual support. It is difficult to label this article as effective due to the lack of any factual support and evidence to back up her arguments. That is exactly what needs to change in the article. Worley must use more sources for information to back up her points, then the article may be more convincing and worth
In, The Population Bomb by, Paul R Ehrlich, he explains the problem of population increase, and how there are people everywhere! The feeling of feeling over populated. He talks about how if there are more people then there is more food that needs to be produced then ate. He explains on the rich people becoming wealthier and the poor are going to be even poorer and there is going to be a starvation. Population is doubling every year and how our energy is turning into
Although, the article is lacking of negative comments, but it had a well organized structure and logical evidence. Overall, Grow. ect did a remarkable chore at the conferment of the obligation provided by the illegal refugees. Disregarded, Illegal immigrants had already developed into a division of American’s finical cycle. I would recommend this article to anyone, especially those who stand on the different ground than the immigrants
Humans are damaging the planet to live comfortably, we must change the way food is distributed worldwide, support local farmers and switch to a healthier diet in order to stop global warming. The current global has been getting better for us humans over the years, from eating bread and eggs 3 times a day in the XV century, now we can eat better than the kings of those times, however the much of the food in not healthy and the global food system still fails in getting food to every individual in the planet and in addition it contributes to the destruction of our world. Ms. Anna Lappe explains how the food system contributes to around 1/3 of the global warming issue in her essay “The Climate Crisis at the End of Our Fork”, while a group of Plos one explains the issues about the export and import of food growth over the last 50 years in the
...ticle, I decided to choose a topic that many people were concerned about approximately one year ago. As it says in the article, the world was never going to come to an end, and people had nothing to worry about. Despite evidence being presented from some very credible sources people will worry no matter what experts say, it’s just human nature. This source was a good source to use to sum everything up that I had learned from my previous sources. The information in the article was peer reviewed, therefore I believe that the article was a credible source of information. The information was presented in a clear and direct manner and in no way confusing. The information provided in this source fits fairly well with my topic. Overall it was a worthwhile source for my subject and I would definitely use articles and sources published by Sarah McCarry again in the future.
The author is trying to persuade readers to his opinion that vaccinations should be required. The majority of the claims are opinion based, with factual evidence used as support. The logical argument of preventing deaths via vaccinations is used, however the article is also purposely introducing fear and guilt. The facts used could sway a reader to the author’s side by making them fear the other option. The article argues it is a citizen's responsibility to be vaccinated, and that not doing so could hurt innocent bystanders. Both these statements conduce an emotional response. The evidence use to support the article is supported by similar facts from other sources but is not well cited within the article nor is an opposing viewpoint addressing the possible consequences of vaccinating mentioned.The information is clearly presented but is meant to create an emotional reaction and does not cite many direct sources or address the opposing
I learned that the article gave some effects on balancing work and family. The author’s message is to prevent and inform work-family conflict. Jansen was trying to get employees to adjust to the working arrangements across to her audience. The argument here was quite implicit. The method the author uses is logical data, and facts, and statistics to get her point across also. I know that the author. Nicole Jansen, is the CEO and Founder of Discover the Edge. She also helped individuals and organizations earn millions of dollars. She actually contributes more than needed for my research paper, and does not affect my research. The intended audience is people who is looking to figure out if they can overcome their work-family conflict. This source was meant to be seen by the public’s eyes. This source is very forceful.
I found the problem with the argument of the article was there was no set argument that was clearly stated. If there was an argument in the article it was not clearly stated and I personally did not catch onto it. Altogether this was a well written article without a clear argument.
In his article, he tries to show readers his ideas and concepts with examples. For instance, he chooses example of Nazism when he claims racial differences regard as a cultural perspective from a biological perspective which was disliked causes of Holocaust by Nazism. (Malik 86) He also picks French to explain all people who have common language do not have a common recognition against the world. (Malik 86) These examples are related to his arguments when he claims ineffectiveness of dying language so examples he gives in the article can make his ideas simply because the readers are likely to imagine how the author tries to say ineffectiveness of dying language. Also, these examples are reliable for readers because he uses factual references and examples which is one of the techniques in article “Thinking and Reading Critically”. His idea is strengthened by using this technique. For example, in “Let Them Die”, he says “Today, biological notions of racial difference have fallen into disfavor, largely as a result of the experience of Nazism and the Holocaust”.(Malik 86) Nazism and the Holocausts are very famous institution and event in world history as everyone knows. People are likely to think about how much the author wants to discourage preservation of dying language. These examples show how you can convince people well because factual example can be a reliable evidence, and support claims to make easy to understand for
To successfully support their claim through a logical approach, the writers utilize statistics and citations from authorities. Based on demographics, appealing to the audience through logic can be an effective approach to convincing them that their argument is correct. According to The New York Times Media Kit, the majority of the people who read The New York Times have been instructed on a collegiate level and can therefore be considered well-educated. The article beings with statistics about the number of people involved in sex trafficking; it states that sex trafficking is “a global phenomenon that may involve upwards of 27 million people.” The article continues by mentioning that sex trafficking is becoming a ...
Milbank explains the issues and The United Nation’s investigation of the Obamacare repeal, using ¨loaded¨ words, otherwise known as persuasive diction, in order to appeal to their liberal audience. The office of UN human rights wrote a paper urging Trump to not repeal Obamacare; ultimately, denying affordable health care becomes a violation of basic human rights. (Milbank, Dana) The author’s intended audience are american liberals. You can conclude this by looking at the demographics of Washington Post’s audience which show majority of the readers are consistently/mostly liberal. (Heimlich) Because of the intended liberal audience, a counterpart to conservative Trump supporters, the article would likely be biased in opposing the repeal. The article would be
The article has lots of objectivity and here are many of reasons to show this. It is objective because
In order for us to maintain our lives, we need to consume food to supply nutrient-needs for our bodies. As the global population increased, the demand for food also increased. Increased population led to mass production of foods. However, even with this mass production, in under-developed countries, people are still undernourished. On other hand, in developed and developing countries, people are overfed and suffering from obesity. In addition, the current methods of industrial farming destroy the environment. These problems raised a question to our global food system. Will it be able to sustain our increasing global population and the earth? With this question in my mind, I decided to investigate the sustainability of our current global food system.
But I would have to say they seemed pretty weak. He did not give examples on how people felt when their country hosted the Olympics. He just made an assumption that people in the country gets a national pride boost. His position was well stated you can get a quick insight on his opinion just by ready the first two sentences. But I would the article validity would be weak since the reasons he gives aren’t really factual.
One of the most complex issues in the world today concerns human population. The number of people living off the earth’s resources and stressing its ecosystem has doubled in just forty years. In 1960 there were 3 billion of us; today there are 6 billion. We have no idea what maximum number of people the earth will support. Therefore, the very first question that comes into people’s mind is that are there enough food for all of us in the future? There is no answer for that. Food shortage has become a serious problem among many countries around the world. There are many different reasons why people are starving all over the world. The lack of economic justice and water shortages are just merely two examples out of them all.