j

1064 Words3 Pages

Alhasn Otaif
Ms. L.NewSome
Writing 4A
March28,2014
Increasing in the Population
Issitt, MicahWarhol, Tom. "Counterpoint: Controlling Population Growth Is Essential." Points Of View: Population Growth (2013): 3. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
The population grows quickly approximately 9 billion. The article showed the people will not be able to get enough sources if the overpopulation continue. We have to control the population. The UN stated that the population will be 70 million persons every year and in 2050 will be more than 9 billion. Also the population reached the highest level in 1987 and was 87 million. So the scientists warned it will be environmental and social problems. For example, the people will fight each other to get the resources. We must try to lease or decreasing the population by any type of controlling like to organize the reproduction or build a system that makes population under the controlling especially in China. That is going to preserve the limited resources more time.

The article was presenting some information about the population issue from the points of views from the library of Texas A&M CC by Micah L. Issitt who is working as freelance writer/researcher and Tom Warhol who is working as Marketing and Development Coordinator. On the other hand, the author was objective, critical and kind of angry about the issue. Because he appeared to stand to stop the issue and gives plan to control it. In addition, he was biased to be worth eliminating this issue. In general, all the information that came in the article was reliable in my point of view and well researched, because it’s from the UN. Some of it was current according to the UN like2013 and the other was old ...

... middle of paper ...

...anet. the United Nations stated that the population is going to reach more six billion. We have to decrease our trash of food because there are a lot of people need it.

The article is from USA Today Magazine. It`s popular magazine. And there was no specific writer appearing in the source.The author was praising in the agricultural to get the benefits from and it’s a good solution for many problems. He was subjective and try to persuade the readers to pay attention for agricultural. Furthermore, he was biased because he is kind of pushing the people forward to the agricultural. All the information was appearing as well-researched because the author used information from the United Nation. Also, it’s current because its since 2011 and reliable. Finally, it's not related with my topic exactly because the article focused on the agricultural more than overpopulation.

Open Document