Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of justice
Example of case study
The injustice of justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of justice
Justice can be defined as a way of seeing what is right and wrong and being able to administer it in a correct way. Sometime the act of justice can teeter on revenge more then what is right. There is a very thin line to what we think is right then what actually is. We can see a lot of examples of this in Homer’s Odyssey. Which will be looked at and reviewed in this paper.
The tale of Odysseus fraught with different kinds of examples of justice. At one point Odysseus is traveling on his way back to Ithaca with many of his men with very little food and drink. He has the idea to entrap the cattle of the sun god Helios.
“Father Zeus! The rest of you blissful gods who never die punish them all,
That crew of Laertes’ son Odysseus what an outrage! They, They killed my cattle, the great joy in my heart….day in, day out when I climbed the starry skies and when I wheeled back down from the heights to touch the earth once more. Unless they pay me back in blood for the butchery of my herds, down I go to the House of Death and blaze among the dead!’”(12: 400-410)
What Helios is trying to say here is that for Odysseus men slaughtering his cattle. He demands retribution from so he wants Zeus to strike down the Odysseus’s men so there blood my pay for the blood of his cattle. Is this truly a correct sense of justice? Are the cattle of Helios mere beasts worth the life of humans? You must think in this day and age cattle are worth their weight in gold. To family the loss of a herd of cattle for that year could mean life or death to them. Even though Helios was a god his claim for his cattle were true and Odysseus had no right to openly slay the sun gods cattle. Without permission of the sun god himself.
In the act of justice your claim...
... middle of paper ...
... He is going to invoke the power of justice and slay these traitorous suitors. Is this not the ultimate from of justice for Odysseus? These suitors have threatened his throne and his family. They suitors have dug their own grave at this part of the story they deserve what is going to happen to them in every way. They betrayed Odysseus’s trust and deserve justice by his own hand. This has to be the ultimate form of justice that you can find in the story.
Justice can always be taken advantage of or even be corrupted by people who wish to take advantage of it. In a world governed by justice it must be taken care of and looked after closely by people that know the difference between ruling for justice or just killing because you think it necessary. Justice will always be in this life rather in a book or in a courtroom being handed down by a jury of your own peers.
Before discussing justice in the epic, it is important to establish the meaning of the term. For our present purpose, justice will specifically apply to the social system of moral checks and balances. Acts that are valued in society are rewarded materially or emotionally. Acts that are devalued lead to punishment. Also, recipients of unmerited punishment receive compensation for their injuries.
...ry for him to learn the virtue of temperance. If he is not able to moderate his impulses towards revenge, feasting, and lovely goddesses, then he shall always be doomed to roam upon the wine dark seas. Obviously he does learn this, since he does return to Ithaka without being smitten down by the gods, but he returns a different Odysseus. The new Odysseus realizes that there is more to living than a feast of roast meats and wine each night before the flawless bed of love of a lovely goddess. The new Odysseus wipes a salt tear from his cheek at the sight of an old hound that lays neglected (17.394).
The last reason why Odysseus did what he had to do was because he needed to seek his revenge. For example eye for an eye. Odysseus thought in his head that since the suitors did this to him, he shall do this to them. Which is not a bad reason for what he did because everybody should be entitled to seek their revenge. Although, there's a justified way to get revenge there is also an unjustified way to get revenge. Odysseus' way was on the border of justice and injustice.
The bloody revenge of the suitors, not all of who deserved their gruesome deaths, is only justifiable because Odysseus is portrayed as such an remarkable epic hero who has slaughtered many men in his lifetime, and now that he is at his lowest point, he has to prove to his family, the suitors, Athena, and himself that he is still godlike in combat. Prior to killing the suitors, Odysseus calls himself very weak and incapable of killing the suitors, followed by saying he would rather be killed now than have to face them. Queen Penelope decides that she will choose a husband based on who...
Killing someone is not the proper punishment. Odysseus shouldn't have killed the suitors. He felt that they should be punished, but they shouldn't have been punished by death. Murder is a sin. Odysseus was in the wrong for handling the problem in that manner, there are other solutions to punishment.
If someone did something wrong to a person in the times of Odysseus he had the right to kill them. Now a person can not do that. He had the right to kill anyone that was considered his property.In Homer’s The Odyssey, Odysseus should have killed the suitors because they messed with his wife, they were not loyal ,and they tried to kill his son. To begin with, Odysseus should have killed the suitors because they messed with his wife.
In conclusion, the revenge of Odysseus on the suitors and the people involved in their evil endeavors, was justified. Odysseus showed himself to be merciful to those who had not betrayed him and his family. Those such as the minstrel, who was a victim, Eumaeus, and Eurycleia were appreciated and rewarded
After Eurylochus and his men decided to kill the cattle, they knew their was gonna be consequences. There was no reason to kill the cattle. By Eurylochus and his men killing Helios’s cattle, Odysseus was furious once he found out. They broke their oath, which meant their destruction. Eurylochus and his men should have never killed Helios's cattle.
After a long journey and countless number of stops, battle and encounters with many people, creatures, and Greek God’s, Odysseus believed he was returning home to his peaceful wife, family, livestock, and wealth. But what he returned to was not how he left it. To solve some of the problems that he was faced with, he had to brutally murder some of the wooer’s or servants, he was hosting. Some people believe that Odysseus acted out of character and his actions weren’t justified. There are plenty of reasons that killing the wooers was the only choice he had. For example, they tried to marry his wife and turn her against him or how they stole his weapons which were going be to be used in a plot to kill him. Not all the wooers were evil or deserved
Odysseus is a figure in the Epic Poem, “The Odyssey,” who is established as brave. He displays several actions that can bring justification to that. After the disaster dealing
Hello, Odysseus, Judge Dulaney, attorneys, and ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I hope that you’re doing well today. Today we have to discuss some grisly business that might be offputting to some of you, but it must be settled in order for justice to be served. You might hear about blood spilling from necks, heads separated from bodies, torn apart chests, and the ordered slaughter of many. All psychotic acts done by one man and one man only. The master of many crafts, the great tactician, the lord of tricks and war, and the murderer of dozens of humans. Odysseus. Let’s go to through the day when a her turned killer.
Odysseus’ idea of his position in society controls many of his decisions due to the never ending preservation of his pride and keeping him elevated from, what he considers, the minority. This is shown when Odysseus confronts the suitors and expresses his feelings towards them. He says, “Not if you paid me all your father’s wealth – all you possess now, and all that could pour in from the world’s end – no, not even then would I stay my hands from slaughter till all you suitors had paid for all your crimes!” (22.65-68). This quotation clearly illustrates the dominance and influence Odysseus’ social standing has on his choices. He is choosing to murder several people, merely for the sake of his
Les Miserables is a story filled with emotion and characters that are very real. They deal with every day emotions that cause them to make choices. These choices have effects on the characters paths in life. As they make decisions and live with their choices they are often left at the feet of a higher law. They are judged on the basis of mercy and justice on a regular basis. In this essay we are going to explore what justice and mercy are as it applies to people’s choices and actions during life in the story and why mercy is often considered the higher law because of its appeal to love.
Odysseus´ quarrel with the god Poseidon, which culminates in the Cyclops’ calling on his father to make sure Odysseus never gets home, dooms Odysseus’ men (###). The rancor Odysseus and Poseidon have for each other leads to many series of unfortunate events that end with Odysseus being the sole survivor of the crew. Odysseus’ incompetence in this situation concluded with these events and could have been easily avoided by the diminishing of Odysseus´ arrogance of which allowed him to believe he could quarrel with a being significantly more powerful than him. Simultaneously, his irrationality when it comes to his dealings with the suitors upon his return to Ithaca represent his incompetence in being the king and a loyal husband to his wife. After proving that he was Odysseus to his wife and the inhabitants of Ithaca, he proceeds to slaughter the unfaithful suitors for attempting to seduce his wife (“Death at the Palace” ###). Odysseus, who is supposedly the king of Ithaca, slaughtered his own subjects that he had the obligation to protect, and at the same time he was disloyal to his wife by virtue of having the expectation that she will always be waiting for him, rather than hoping that in his extended absence she would remain happy and seek a new lover as a father figure for their
Of course I looked “justice” up in the dictionary before I started to write this paper and I didn’t find anything of interest except of course a common word in every definition, that being “fair”. This implies that justice has something to do with being fair. I thought that if one of the things the law and legal system are about is maintaining and promoting justice and a sense of “fairness”, they might not be doing such a spiffy job. An eye for an eye is fair? No, that would be too easy, too black and white.