Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theoretical framework on bullying among secondary
How to address the issue of bullying
Causes and solutions to bullying
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theoretical framework on bullying among secondary
The controversial question that many American’s ask is “Should there be harsher punishments for bullies?”. Most people either believe they should be treated as criminals, or they should not be treated as criminals. However, they do not take time to find other solutions to the problem. Rather than letting these kids get themselves in too deep with the law, why not find solutions that could prevent bullying from happening in the first place? Instead of enforcing harsher punishments against these children, adults should work together to help them deal with their own troubles. The first tactic schools could enforce when reconstructing their bullying prevention techniques includes teaching kids more about being kind and considerate. Obviously, …show more content…
Many schools use the three main forms of punishment when it comes to bullying; the zero-tolerance rule, suspension or expulsion from school, and solving the problem face-to-face. The zero-tolerance rule states that if a person is caught in the act, they immediately receive punishment. Punishment may range from detention to a few days of suspension (lawyers.com). Schools must get rid of this policy, because the students does not always learn from the punishment. Often times, they take the out of school suspension as a “vacation”, and become angered with the person who ordered them the punishment. The zero-tolerance policy is not an effective way of dealing with bullying in …show more content…
Detention helps only for the reason that the bully gets time to think about their actions, however, while sitting in detention, the anger that they received from being punished builds up. This build up of anger causes them to want revenge from their bullied victim. This new found motivation to bully more could progress into harsher bullying, which would cause the bullying to worsen from the bullying before. Overall, these former methods of punishment for bullying in schools cause the bullying to progress rather than
Once tolerance and acceptance is established and taught, bullying and harassment in secondary schools will significantly drop. Aside from the ineffectiveness of bullying programs, “Targets of bullying behaviors are more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem” (Domino, 2013). Not only are schools being ineffective with their programs, the students are facing the effects of this. “Research has advocated that individuals must work together to effectively reduce bullying practices within schools” (Jones and Augustine, 2015). By creating a kindness program, students will be taught to work together to solve problems, and, in the end, create a better society.
Every seven minutes a child is bullied. On average, 68 percent of students say that “other kids pick on them, make fun of them or bully them” (“Statistics”). This causes students to turn to violence. bullied or made fun of which cause them to become violent. How much longer are schools going to sit back and do nothing about bullies? Without punishing bullies, students’ will continue to harm themselves to massive extents. Schools are not doing enough to stop or prevent bullying, as demonstrated by the creation of the group Stand for the Silent.
The zero tolerance policy has become a national controversy in regards to the solid proven facts that it criminalizes children and seems to catch kids who have no intention of doing harm. Although, there has been substantial evidence to prove that the policies enforced in many schools have gone far beyond the extreme to convict children of their wrongdoing. The punishments for the act of misconduct have reached a devastating high, and have pointed students in the wrong direction. Despite the opinions of administrators and parents, as well as evidence that zero tolerance policies have deterred violence in many public and private schools, the rules of conviction and punishment are unreasonable and should be modified.
Oww! Stop that!(Bully)-I'll be back tomorrow you dumb kid. I postulate that there should be harsher punishments for bullying. I think this because if they don´t get harsher punishments they will keep doing it and will not stop.
Over the last decade, bullying has really been a worldwide issue. Bullying is affecting children all over the world and has grown into a huge epidemic. According to the National Education Association, “160,000 kids stay home from school each day to ...
I personally do not believe that the zero-tolerance policy is a good thing because it limits the students abilities to defend themselves. The wellbeing of the students is and should always be the most important factor for public schools.
Towards the late 1900s, the United States became more concern regarding increases in violence in schools, leading educational departments to attempt to create policies that could as a prevention measure for violence within the schools. These policies became known as the zero tolerance policy and were based on the Broken Window theory, which is the belief that “less social control creates an environment that attracts serious crimes in communities” (Bell, 2015, p. 14). Coming from this ideology, the zero tolerance policy was viewed as a prevention strategy that would enforce strict consequences on students’ misconduct, scaring students to deter from misbehaving in school. Within only a few years, the zero tolerance policy gain massive popularity,
The zero-tolerance policy gives schools organizational structure and a safe environment which is needed to promote learning. Creating policies that provide safety for all students is the responsibility of school officials and administrators. Adopting the zero-tolerance policies for schools will deter students from breaking rules that can harm them or others while in school. Although all students can not be deterred from causing harm the zero-tolerance policy sends a message that if students decide to break any of the rules consequences will be faced. Some parents may not agree to the consequences placed upon their kids for breaking these rules, however it is the duty of the school administrators and staff to keep students from being harmed
The main purpose for zero tolerance policies was to prevent violence within school grounds, so as to protect every student on school grounds. “However, research indicates that zero-tolerance policy expulsions are primarily for non-violent offenses, because the definition of bullying includes verbal aggression and other forms of non-physical intimidation” (Borgwald 150). These policies are ineffective in how they are implemented because expelling a student for any infraction gives them no chance to learn from their mistakes. In addition, the policies actually lead to an increase in covert bullying, such as cyberbullying, as opposed to direct bullying (Borgwald
...also remember to teach our children how important kindness and compassion is. Bullying is such an unecessary evil and its up to parents, teachers and adults to protect our children from this abuse.
...of rule-setting against bullying should be implemented not only on an individual level, but on a classroom and school-level as well. "The school," says Dan Olweus, "has a responsibility to stop bullying behavior and create a safe learning environment for all students." He suggests a curriculum that constantly monitors abusive behavior, promotes kindness, acceptance of differences and educates teachers, school staff, parents and children alike about bullying and response strategies.
Bullying has been a part of schooling for as long as children have been congregating. To some it seems like a natural, though uncomfortable, part of life and school experience, while to others it can mean terrifying experiences which spoiled and characterized otherwise happy years in school. Dan Olweus, a pioneer in bully behavior research documented that 2.7 million children are affected as victims, and that 2.1 children act as bullies (Fried, 1997, as cited in Aluedse, 2006). With bullying cited as the reason for violent, gun-related crime in the past few years, school districts as well as national governments have put anti-bullying policies in place. Bullying is a complicated phenomenon, involving more than one child demanding lunch money from a smaller child. It is a worldwide epidemic hitting schools everywhere. Virtually everyone has seen or experienced bullying. With technological advances, bullying is even hitting the internet. Parents, teachers, students and governments agencies alike are attempting to put a stop to bullying practices.
5). Additionally the other side offers as a good alternative to this particular form of punishment is for schools to “work with the bullies and their parents in a firm and assertive way as to steer them away from such disruptive actions (Greenya, 2015, p. 5). Further validation by the other side contends that the passing of anti-bullying laws would impose added burden and responsibility on schools (Bullying. Issues & Controversies, 2014, p. 2). Yet another aspect of the other side’s argument is that anti-bullying laws increases the need to “police the school community 24 hours a day,” requiring a vast number of individuals and resources (Bullying.
Bullying is undesirable, antagonistic manner among school going children that involves a real alleged power discrepancy. The power imbalance comes about because the bullies uses their physical strength, their power, embarrassing information, obnoxious language, or their reputation to control or maltreat other kids. The bullies are prone to recap the behavior over time. The act for bullying is agonizing because those bullied are long affected by the act and may live in fear in their life. Issues have arisen whether the bully should receive a special form of punishment at a particular age because just like the other offenses bullying should be punishable.
Bullying has always been present within the United States. Although the issue has been around for a long time, it continues to grow and become more of problem. It is said that about 160,000 children within the United States are refusing to go to school because of bullying. Another statistic is that within American schools alone, there are an estimated 2.1 billion bullies and 2.7 billion victims (Dan Olewus, MBNBD). The numbers presented here are outrageous and although there are organizations to stop bullying, obviously there needs to be a new set of solutions. Any type of bullying presents problems to children, “Suicide, depression, anxiety, substance abuse, trouble with the law, poor performance in school and work, and lack of involvement in socially accepted activities are some of the difficulties resulting from bullying (Austin, Reynolds, Barnes, Shirley). Of course, there is more than just a single type of bullying. Feeding ground for bullies can range anywhere from text-message or cyberbullying to physical bullying in schools. Also, bullies can begin to strike at a young age and could also be; teenage, middle-age, or even the elderly. Even though there are these many versions of problematic bullies, the largest bullying problems take place within the school setting: a place that is supposed to be safe for children rather than harmful. Although it seems impossible to completely get rid of bullying, these are a few suggested solutions; making the school informed on bullying issues, schools implementing rules on bullying, and having students positively use electronics to stop bullying.