Shakespeare’s Hamlet offers what can be feasibly seen as a captivating tale of vengeance, but it struggles to grasp younger audiences with its Elizabethan style English and script-like format. Thus, film adaptations of the original play are primarily met with uninterested glances. Franco Zeffirelli’s reimagination of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet produces a competent interpretation of the iconic play, that strives to reach newer age audiences. With much of the text diced, great setting, realistic costumes, and an all-star cast, the film offers what amounts to a decent introduction to Shakespeare's classic, without losing any of the play's psychological complexities.
According to Zeffirelli, the goal of this film was to make an “especially
…show more content…
Audiences notice examples of the “trimmed fat” from the first scene, which is of the funeral of King Hamlet, preceded by the wedding of Claudius and Hamlet’s mother Gertrude. Instead, of the original’s approach of King Hamlet’s ghostly apparition in the presence of a petrified Horatio. Zeffirelli's approach is based on the assertion that Shakespeare was a popular playwright, writing for the common man, and that concessions for the mass audience and for shortened modern attention spans were allowable. Zeffirelli’s Hamlet is a cinematic experience that doesn’t cut expenses, in providing authentic visuals and the realistic attire of the Victorian era in Denmark. This version of Hamlet has an extremely good set design that complements the mood of each scene perfectly. Zeffirelli sets his film in a spectacular location, a castle on an outcropping of the coast in northern Scotland, on top of a rock nearly surrounded by the sea (Hinson). The castle has a great look to it, both inside and outside. There was rain and mist, and the characters …show more content…
Mel Gibson was the big-ticket item in Zeffirelli’s Hamlet. Consequently, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Zeffirelli conceded “Audiences might fret about Mel a bit at the beginning, but he quickly becomes very convincing, and I'm sure he'll attract an audience to this film that otherwise wouldn't see it. Who'd go see 'Hamlet' with a lesser actor? Today you need someone who offers the image young people worship and Mel has that.” (McKenna) It was an understandable statement, at the time, Gibson had featured in robust action greats such as Lethal Weapon and the Mad Max series. Understandably, it surprised many of Gibson’s fans in his decision reprieve a role in Zeffirelli’s film. Despite the skepticism and odd scrutiny, Gibson’s portrayal of Hamlet was the most true-to-human nature as anyone ever attempted. His brooding and depressing personality was realistic. He was passionate, powerful and the epitome of a son who has gone through mental torment over his father's death and the incestuous marriage of his mother. Gibson is well supported by noteworthy members such as Glenn Close (Gertrude), who featured in the psychological thriller Fatal Attraction, and Ian Holm (Polonius) who partnered with a succeeding Hamlet, Kenneth Branagh, in the 1989 epic, Henry V. In summary, With Gibson’s physical, risqué Hamlet, well supported by a host of glittering names, Zeffirelli's “Hamlet of the 90’s”
The “To be or not to be” soliloquy should demonstrate that Hamlet is trying to push himself to commit the act of murder. Moreover, this is because he does not have the courage to commit murder, but he has to, to avenge his father. With this in mind, Richard Burton played the most compelling Hamlet out of the three options. Richard displays the typical human response effortlessly which is to push oneself to do something they do not desire to do. His portrayal is believable as it appears he battles with the emotions that a person would endure in a similar situation. Richards Hamlet exhibits more strength and energy than the other actors. He made the character’s actions believable by focusing on the inner turmoil he struggled with for having not had the courage to commit his premeditated murder of Claudius.
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the longest of his tragedies, has been continuously performed since it was written, including in numerous film adaptations. In addition to the lack of restrictive stage directions in Hamlet, the conversion from the original medium to film allows for directors to impart their artistic decisions and add depth with the use of music, lighting, and camera angles. For instance, Gregory Doran’s adaptation of Act III, Scene IV communicates his directorial vision through the use of props, as well as through the portrayal of Hamlet and Gertrude’s characters. Doran uses props to his advantage in order to emphasize several ideas. For instance, when Hamlet kills Polonius, he shoots the latter through a mirror, which shatters, reflecting the situation that Hamlet faces.
Zeffirelli’s filmic Hamlet evidently interprets the original play especially considering Mel Gibson’s performance making it easy for the audience to understand Shakespearean dialect. Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a man with friends who proves to be much more reserved, and manipulative than someone might imagine today. His hamlet is considerate in his plans, but with no tact interpersonally. Zeffirelli’s audience is required to focus on the troubles, and character of Hamlet, who is nonstop, and unfriendly, but a sensitive loner when the time is right. Zeffirelli accomplishes this mixture while staying faithful to his starting place my maintaining solid screenplay with a constant flow supporting his own take on the story. Concisely, Zeffirelli’s Hamlet is both a free and a loyal understanding of its source, which is, for today’s viewers, a Hamlet in its own right.
In the early 1900s, Hamlet was “rediscovered.” A resurgence of productions came about, and with the creation of a modern director now in place, several alternations were made. Hamlet was converted into movies, opera, condensed plays, parodies, and even later offshoots were created, such as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead.
An orchestral background that enters the scene halfway through, as if to add emphasis to the point that Hamlet was driving toward, cheapens the scene even more. David Tennant’s approach to the scene is the opposite of the Branagh interpretation. Tennant’s Hamlet in a manner in which he is isolated and the only audio that the audience hears is the actor’s voice, in addition to a slow, detached speech pattern during the recital of the lines that Branagh seemingly sped through without necessary pause. Tennant’s version connects with the audience in a more real way, making the onlooker feel as if he or she could be in Hamlet’s position and the weight that he feels in that moment.
After watching Kenneth Branaghs 1996 version of Hamlet I realized how closely this film was
Hamlet, one of the most intricate and influential plays by Shakespeare, debatably of all time. It has inspired not only appreciative readers and writing critiques but continuous generations of people. The inspiration led to the fabrication of many great movies, which wasn’t achievable until the 20th century. Before cinema was the prevalent method of sharing appreciation and spilling emotion for a specific subject, art portrayed what would fly through our minds such as the many interpretations of Ophelia’s death. With the imagery put into motion we can try and pick apart how certain people might view the play being portrayed and choose what best suits our expectation of this tragedy. Other things that only film has been able to present to us is the various camera angles, a setting that isn’t restricted to a stage and an audience that can be reached anywhere in the world. Also who is casted and how they will be dressed is crucial to the success of the movie although sometimes overlooked during the production process. Some movies represent these elements of mise-en-scene in an excellent matter such as the Kenneth Branagh version of Hamlet, while others would seem to disappoint my expectations for a great re-visualization of our suicidal hero like Micheal Almereyda’s Hamlet staring Ethan Hawke. Admirably though every Hamlet film to date has its own unique style, something that will please all audiences, with its unique pros and cons.
In Hamlet Shakespeare is able to use revenge in an extremely skillful way that gives us such deep insight into the characters. It is an excellent play that truly shows the complexity of humans. You can see in Hamlet how the characters are willing to sacrifice t...
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is arguably one of the best plays known to English literature. It presents the protagonist, Hamlet, and his increasingly complex path through self discovery. His character is of an abnormally complex nature, the likes of which not often found in plays, and many different theses have been put forward about Hamlet's dynamic disposition. One such thesis is that Hamlet is a young man with an identity crisis living in a world of conflicting values.
William Shakespeare is seen to many as one of the great writers in history. More specifically, the characters in his plays are reviewed and criticized and have been so for nearly four centuries. The character that many have revered Shakespeare for is perhaps the greatest such character ever in literature, Hamlet from Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The commentary and response to this legend of literature is of wide array and opinion, though most, such as Pennington, believe him to be a truly magnificent character: "Hamlet is perhaps the cleverest hero ever written, the subject of the first European tragedy, a form of genius. A type Shakespeare despaired of writing thereafter, having perceived that the heroes of tragedies must be sublime idiots" (185). However, despite his clear gifts and aura, Hamlet was a doomed character from the beginning: Hamlet is dominated by an emotion that is inexpressible. It is thus a feeling he cannot understand, he cannot objectify it, and it therefore remains open to poison life and to obstruct action" (Eliot 25). Thus, Hamlet, while possessing the traits of no other men of his time, a true Renaissance man, was doomed from the beginning of the play partly by forces he could not control, and also partly by his own character. It leads to a slow but definite ending to one of literature's great characters, one that he could not control. In the end, Hamlet was out of place in his environment, he was simply not meant to be.
Different adaptations of William Shakespeare’s works have taken various forms. Through the creative license that artists, directors, and actors take, diverse incarnations of his classic works continue to arise. Gregory Doran’s Hamlet and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet bring William Shakespeare’s work by the same title to the screen. These two film adaptations take different approaches in presenting the turmoil of Hamlet. From the diverging takes on atmosphere to the characterization of the characters themselves, the many possible readings of Hamlet create the ability for the modification of the presentation and the meaning of the play itself. Doran presents David Tenant as Hamlet in a dark, eerie, and minimal setting; his direction highlighting the
Instead of a grand tragedy of a royal house, the modern Hamlet is a detective story about a dead rich guy and his son the beginner detective. Yet, the acting of the actors and the special effects more or less manage to make up for the flaw. Bill Murray who plays Polonious is harsh and tight. Ethan Hawke is illustrated as a weak and normal prince. Julia Stiles does not do Ophelia any justice. Ther...
Michael Almereyda’s movie adaptation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet brings about a new perspective through its performance. The movie adaptation, Hamlet (2000), retells the original play in a modernized setting, bringing out various different elements of characters, which highlights a new reading of these characters as individuals, and a newfangled reading of the play as well. Throughout the movie, Ophelia and Gertrude, the woman-leads, are advanced in a progressive manner compared to the original play. In particular, Gertrude from Hamlet (2000) is noticeably altered from Hamlet, the play. This new interpretation of Gertrude and the play created by the movie adaptation advances the position of Gertrude as a woman, as well as motifs of incest, misogyny,
Employs auteur theory of filmmaking, in which Branagh writes, directs, and stars in this production of Hamlet, as a result, artistic liberties, lighting, placement, portrayal and stage directions all convey the notions of Kenneth Branagh. Can be characterized with bright animated screenplay, very clear elements of madness, darkness, evil, and an aversion to foliage (Denmark rotting). All summarized with the final resolution of the play, lighting, character placement, props, and the details of the set. (Act V, Scene
The perfection of Hamlet’s character has been called in question - perhaps by those who do not understand it. The character of Hamlet stands by itself. It is not a character marked by strength of will or even of passion, but by refinement of thought and sentiment. Hamlet is as little of the hero as a man can be. He is a young and princely novice, full of high enthusiasm and quick sensibility - the sport of circumstances, questioning with fortune and refining on his own feelings, and forced from his natural disposition by the strangeness of his situation.