Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic effect of fast fashion positive and negative
Supplying fast fashion (case studies)
Growth of fast fashion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fast fashion is getting faster and cheaper, but who bares the cost for the rising demand for this type of clothing? Most of the time, the effects are felt in the countries where the brands are not even sold and where they are produced. Consumerism has a lot to do with the success of stores like Uniqlo, Forever 21 and Primark. These types of stores are making fashion accessible to all, and thus trends are becoming more and more short-lived, making people always wanting newer and cheaper items. Inditex, Zara’s parent company, grew its number of store from 500 in 1995 to more than 2500 in 2015. Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) had fewer than 400 stores in 1995, and now has over 3500 (The Economist, 2014). Most of these brand’s clothing items are so inexpensive …show more content…
The biggest financial effect was the compensation amounts they were asked to pay to the families of the victims. Among those who paid such compensations, Primark paid the equivalent of nine months salary to 3639 workers and their families (14 million dollars overall) and Joe Fresh (Loblaw’s) donated 4 million dollars to a compensation trust fund, however, only half the businesses involved in the factory that collapse have yet to pay compensations (Strauss et al., 2013). On April 24th of 2013, Rana Plaza, an eight-story commercial building collapsed, it was the deadliest garment factory accident in history and deadliest structure failure of contemporary human history. The building was not only home to clothing factories; it also contained a bank, apartments and other shops. However, following the warnings sent to the owner about cracks in the foundation of the buildings, the bank and the shops were immediately closed, but the workers of the factory of not informed of the conditions; the building collapsed the following day. The factory was home to the production of many well-known brands such as Benetton, Primark and Joe Fresh. Primark, which is owned by Associated British Foods …show more content…
Nike ranked number one for many key attributes, such as innovation, people management, social responsibility, global competitiveness and quality of products and services (Fortune, 2015). Nike financials suffered from the scandal because it was taken to the US court of law. In 1991, Life Magazine published an article about child labor in Pakistan, where Nike was the number one concerned company. They have allegedly employed children as young as nine years old to produce soccer balls and sports shoes, and had to work exhausting hours in inhuman conditions. Child labor in Pakistan is a very important issue, it has been demonstrated multiple times by international medias, but nothing has been done about it by governments (TED, 1999). According to Unicef, in 2011, there was an estimate of more than thirteen million child working in Pakistan, of those, 73% are boys and 27% are girls (Unicef, 2011). They are working in different industries such as agriculture and manufacturing (Appendix 3). Following the allegations, Nike felt public-relations impacts in the short-run, but in the longer run, the growth sand sales of the company were not affected. Only their image has suffered, but the image customers now have is
Nike publicizes itself as one of the leading industries in corporate responsibility. However, they do not comply with several human rights obligations overseas in countries like Thailand, Pakistan, China, Vietnam and Indonesia. In these countries, production facilities called sweatshops have been running for almost 35 years employing workers as young as 13 years of age. The conditions of these factories are adverse to say the least and deprive workers of the moral human rights they should be entitled to. Sweatshops are unethical, immoral and demonstrate Nike’s ignorance towards their social responsibilities abroad. Within these facilities, workers endure stressfully long days under undesirable conditions, often with no breaks and very little pay. While this is going on overseas, sponsored athletes are being paid million dollar salaries here in North America. Although Nike’s reputation has been foiled through the tabloids regarding this issue, they have been making a substantial effort to “clean up” production messes in the East.
...rible situations for people who do not have the laws like U.S. workers have. Even though NIKE has implemented different methods to improve the companies’ image, there have still been many reports that show there has not been much change at all. At a net worth of 67 billion dollars and expected to grow, loyal customers is what allows this multi billion dollar company to grow in profit, the only way there will be an impact on those working in NIKE sweatshops is if today’s society takes action.
1) With which of the international competitors listed in the case is it most interesting to compare Inditex’s financial results? Why? What do comparisons indicate about Inditex’s relative operating economics? Its relative capital efficiency? Note that while the electronic version of Exhibit 6 automates some of the comparisons, you will probably want to dig further into them?
In June of 1996, Life magazine published a article about Nike’s child labor that was occurring in Pakistan. The article showed a little boy who was surrounded by pieces of Nike sports gear. The articles were shoes and soccer balls. Nike then knew then that they had to make some major changes in the way they were producing their items.
Fast fashion is a complex and multifaceted problem that has effects reaching to every corner of the globe. ‘Fast fashion,’ similar to fast food, is cheap, easily accessible, mass produced globally standardized product. It is characterized by sweatshop labor, supply chains, and large profits for the sellers. From the countries that grow the raw material for clothing, to those that produce textiles, to those that contain sweatshops, to those that are full of consumers ready to buy the next item on the shelves, this is a growing global issue that needs to be stopped in its tracks.
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
Problem Statement: In 2003, Zara's CIO must decide whether to upgrade the retailer's IT infrastructure and capabilities. At the time of the case, the company relies on an out-of-date operating system for its store terminals and has no full-time network in place across stores. Despite these limitations, however, Zara's parent company, Inditex, has built an extraordinarily well-performing value chain that is by far the most responsive in the industry. Therefore the major problem to the company is to decide whether it has to upgrade the present system and by doing so, risking the reliability they have with the current system or to continue with the present DOS based system which will not be compatible for future changes or improvements.
The business model that sets Zara apart from other clothing retailers is how rapidly the company changes stocks and releases new product lineups. The company averages 12-16 collections annually which equates to more than one lineup a month. Due to stock being limited and the rapid production Zara brings forth, their items are viewed as exclusive promoting further business. Their customers are happy knowing that their specific article of clothing is more “rare” due to only having an average of a two-week window to purchase the clothing. The company specifically targets current trends and has them in the store within 30 days. This maintains the brand’s uniqueness and relativity in fashion.
Phil Knight started his shoe company by selling shoes from the back of his car. As he became more successful in 1972 he branded the name Nike. In the 1980’s Nike Corporation quickly grew and established itself as a world leader in manufacturing and distributing athletic footwear and sports' attire. The Nike manufacturing model has followed is to outsource its manufacturing to developing nations in the Asia Pacific, Africa, South and Latin Americas; where labor is inexpensive. It quickly became known for its iconic “swoosh” and “Just do it” advertisements and products. Its highly successful advertising campaigns and brand developed its strong market share and consumer base. But, the road has not always been easy for Nike; in the late 1990’s they went through some challenging times when their brand become synonymous with slave wages and child labor abuses. During this period, Nike learned that it paramount that the company understands its stakeholders’ opinions and ensures their values are congruent with their stakeholders. Nike learned that their stakeholders were concerned with more than buying low cost products; their customers were also concerned with ethical and fair treatment of their workers. Because Nike was unwilling to face the ethical treatment of its employees, the company lost its loyal customers and damaged its reputation. Nike has bounced back since the late 1990’s and revived its reputation by focusing on its internal shortfalls and attacking its issues head on. Nike nearly collapsed from its missteps in the late 1990’s. They have learned from their mistakes and taken steps to quickly identify ethical issues before they become a crisis through ethics audits. This paper is based on the case study of Nike: From Sweatsh...
Problem Recognition is the first step in the consumer decision making purchase. When customer passes through this step, it moves to the second step which is known as information search. Zara focuses on this step. When customers starts collecting information to know about a particular brand or various alternatives available in the market. As per the customers of Zara, various factors can influence their decision to choose Zara. Some of the factors that can influence the decision of its customers are products, brand image and brand identity, coming up with new products every two to three weeks and ambience of Zara stores and outlets. The decision factors differs from a person to person are unique for every person. Zara has to focus on factors like brand image, brand identity, products, ambience of its stores, so that it can influence the consumer’s decision and attract more customers to choose Zara. (Vaxjo, K. 2011)
The fundamental business strategy of Zara is very simple which is linking customer demand to manufacturing, and liking manufacturing to distribution. Zara has been running their business in fashion industry which is susceptible to seasons and quick changing customer tastes. Zara has been approached to and considered their business as a perishable commodity business just like a fresh baked cake or bread to be consumed quickly.
Nike has responsibility for the working conditions of their employees who produce Nike products. In cases of multinational companies, the question of whose ethics and standards to follow is often disputed. Best judgement and reasoning and a combination of the countries’ standards combine to decide on appropriate treatment. In Nike’s case, as part of their strategy, they moved work overseas to save on labor costs. However, the employees still work in Nike factories making Nike products, and Nike has responsibility to protect their working conditions and workers’ rights. They should guarantee workers are being paid fairly according to the minimum wage, ensure their overseas factories comply with child labor laws, and certify the working conditions are clean and safe. In the cases of minimum wage pay and child labor laws of the country, Nike should allow itself to go above and beyond and raise their own factories’ standards if standards for pay and child labor are low in any country. Nike customers
“80% of the world soccer balls are made by Nike in Sialkot (Pakistan), a city of 3 million people”, according to David Montero in Is Doing The Right Thing Wrong ?( page 108). Nike’s contract with Saga Sports in March of 2007. Nike fears that Saga hiring children will violate laws,so Nike will not have Saga work for them. This will cost about 4,000 pakistani jobs. Also affects more than just the workers but their families.Although some say children are working in dangerous environments, people should buy products manufactured by child labor because children work so hard to make that product.
This paper describes the various aspects of the Zappos case. The objective is to evaluate the depth analysis of the Zappos strategy. It enables to determine the Zappos strategy, business model & marketing strategy, and smartness of the Zappos acquisition.
Working in these large factories can threaten children's future. The workplace the children are being forced to work in is unsafe and can threaten their health due to toxic chemicals and dangerous machinery. Many of nike's factories use chemicals to manufacture their products, John H. Cushman says, “ Footwear factories have heavy machinery and use very dangerous raw material, including solvents that cause toxic air pollution.” Kids working eight hours a day breathing in toxic fumes cannot be worth the 1