Young Public Leaders are Less Effective Due to Little Experience.

The world continues to engage on the veracious debate of whether a leader is really born or nurtured. Irrespective of your opinion concerning this debate, it is agreeable that whether born or made, some kind of training is unavoidable.

Experience is nothing else but the training. The wise see it as the best teacher. A person who lacks experience will not be in a position to deliver. You only do something right when you know how to do it. Knowing how to do it comes from the experience somebody has amassed over the years. This confirms why the effectiveness of young people in public leadership is wanting.

Public leadership does not request but rather demands experience. This aspect is lacking nearly in all young people. Experience is something, which result from a series of many years’ encounters. This then goes beyond and instills in somebody new measures to encounter future challenges. If you have not encountered a new challenge then it would be very difficult to prepare for it in future. Young people have not experienced as much as the older people have. It is the challenges that make people sit down and draw the big picture of where they want to belong in coming days.

Young leadership cannot be discussed without mentioning Andy Rajoelina; the youngest president Madagascar has ever seen. President Rajoelina presents every reason as to why public leadership needs experience and that age is a major factor to consider. When he got power, Madagascar went into a political turmoil and military confusion. He did not have the right experience to handle the situation. A leader needs to be a person with firm grounds and believes. This takes time to cultivate and goes along to prove why young leaders have to learn first before leading pub...

... middle of paper ...

...row. In addition to this, they claim that young people have the energy and zeal to get things done. They adapt easily to ever changing technology. They are the right people to sphere head tomorrow’s destiny. What they forget is that this is unachievable without experience.

In conclusion, besides the shortcomings associated with young leadership, people are gradually changing their attitude towards the young. First is because of the factors mentioned above about advantages of young leadership in public offices. Secondly, the dynamics of leadership have changed and more people are advocating for inclusion of all categories of people in leadership. This formula provides a training platform for both old and young to learn from each other. When the young people work with the old, the old are able to nurture the young and leadership as an institution will remain forever.