Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The internet's effect on modern society
How the internet is changing society document
The internet's effect on modern society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The internet's effect on modern society
From the beginning of the millennial generation until today, the internet has changed from being a resource for exclusive groups, to a resource for the public, and finally, a central medium humans use for expression. In fact, the internet and its host of platforms (such as MySpace, Facebook, and Youtube) have become such widely used media for expression, that in many ways, individual voice is becoming a thing of the past. Instead, individual data is becoming our future. These same large organizations that the internet is centered around use the data they collect from actual people in order to target those same people later, so they can profit off of their interests and habits. It seems that a common theme between both of these problems is not …show more content…
This idea is coined in the term “noosphere” by Jaron Lanier in his book, You are Not a Gadget. He defines this as the “supposed global brain formed by the sum of all the human brains connected through the internet” (Lanier 45). However, this idea can create results more negative than one might imagine. As Lanier puts it, “a continuation of the present trend will make us like…North Korea, a society with a single book” (Lanier 46). He is afraid that, as a society, we will simply turn into a simplistic whole—not striving for self-expression and individualism, but instead focusing on being one giant mass. Through this, the entire concept of what it means to be human will have, in a way, faded. This concept of losing individualism through the internet is not only a mere prediction of the future, but also a theme that has been occurring on the internet across the life span of the millennial generation. A clear example of this is seen in observing the trends of social media. In the year 2005, the majority of the internet’s social media usage was concentrated on a website called MySpace. Here, people were able to customize their profiles to any level they …show more content…
To do this, there must be some way to pay those who post their creative content on the internet for access to view it, instead of paying companies like Facebook to use their services with our privacy. Although this solution noble, it is simply not feasible. Denise Caruso, in Deep Lab, also mentions in relation to the data gathering of big companies that “code is code. They used it to invade. We’ll use it to subvert the invasion” (Caruso, 107). This solution is not really one at all, because simply saying that code will save us from a loss of individualism and privacy is too vague to have any meaning. A solution to using advertisement as the sole method for profit, for example, can be seen in the work of Luis von Ahn, another professor at Carnegie Mellon University, like Caruso. He created a business model which offers “education to millions” while paying for its debts using the intelligence it has given its own users. Duolingo is an application that teaches someone a language, and then has them translate pieces of texts from Wikipedia or news articles in return. This business model educates people, makes profit, and also globalizes the availability of information on the internet, all at the same time. Through this sustainable model, Ahn has been able to create a
This can be seen by how the internet can influence us by the information that have obtained and how the lack of privacy on the internet is establishing a belief that the lack of privacy is not an issue. The internet influencing the world drastically is seen in the quote, “As marketing pitches and products offerings become more tightly tied to our past patterns of behavior, they become more powerful as triggers of future behavior.” This quote explains how companies and other sources can predict our future by our past purchases, visits, and comments. Another problem that can occur is the loss of liberty due to the limited freedom on the web. This loss of freedom is shown in the quote, “The greatest danger posed by the continuing erosion of personal privacy is that it may lead us as a society to devalue the concept of privacy, to see it as outdated and unimportant.” This quote reveals that the loss of freedom on the internet can result in much larger losses of freedom in other aspects of our daily
It seems that we have simply accepted that the cost of doing business is to forgo our right to our personal information. There is no doubt that a person’s digital footprint can influence their “credit” (Andrews 239) worthiness or the ability of “obtaining a job” (Andrews 239), as the author points out. She offers evidence to support her point that “employers” (Andrews 239) look at social media sites before making a hiring decision (Andrews 239). The author also talks about the perils of “aggregate data” (Andrews 239) and how credit limits can be increased or decreased based on digital footprints. She offers a good example of an individual whose credit line was downgraded after “returning from his honeymoon” (Andrews 239) purely based on the places where he shopped. Furthermore, Andrews points out the “stereotypical” (239) side of “data aggregation” (239) and the roadblocks imposed on communities. The author discusses how communities are targeted with ads based on their perceived potential in regards with geographical areas and demographics and not on based on an individual’s abilities. I find this point unsupported. While the author offered generalized information, she did not give specific examples as to where this has occurred. The
When Tim Berners-Lee created the Internet as a non-proprietor, not-for-profit information conduit, he could not have predicted how controversial digitized intellectual property would become. Prior to the Internet, intellectual property was a fairly straightforward issue. It was protected with copyright, trademark, and patent legislations, which granted exclusive rights to owners. Violations were not as abundant because distribution was constrained by time and space. Moreover, violators were identifiable because anonymity was difficult to achieve. In today's "global village" however, digital information such as books, music, software and art can be instantly shared between two anonymous users, without any fee to the creator. Legislation is much more difficult to enforce.
In his essay, “I Feel So Totally, Digitally Close to You,” Clive Thompson argues that the original conceit of the Internet was that it allowed people the ability to forged new identities for themselves on the World Wide Web, however, with the introduction of social media, this ability has become a hard, if not impossible, task to achieve. With constant updates of a person’s everyday life being presented to the world, it is difficult to manipulate a new identity overnight. Although I do agree with Thompson’s view that social media has made it almost difficult for a person to reinvent his or her identity, yet, however, it is not entirely impossible to do so. Outside the infrastructures of social media websites like Facebook, the reinventing of
“Social media, a web-based and mobile technology, has turned communication into a social dialogue, and dominates the younger generation and their culture. As of 2010, Generation Y now outnumbers Baby Boomers, and 96% of Gen Y has joined a social network” (Qualman 1). Social media now accounts for the number one use of the Internet, and this percentage is rising bigger every day (Qualman). As a consequence, people are becoming more reliant on social media, which has a led to a number of advantageous as well as unfavorable effects. The world is more connected today than it has ever been in the past, and this is all because of growth in technology. What has yet to be determined though
I've become a huge advocate of the role that "social media" can play in creating participatory environments within communities and local governments, however I've rarely taken a step back to look at the privacy implications of the rapidly emerging "Gov 2.0". Technology advocates (such as myself) tend to push a system where people dump their ideas, feelings, and misgivings about their communities into an online environment, but is there ever a moment where we stop and think about how we might be asking people to incrementally give up their privacy? Each piece of information, each opinion, each comment allows potential onlookers to gain more insight into our private lives. In The Future of Reputation author Daniel Solove takes a broad look at privacy on the internet and the consequences of what can happen when information intended toward one audience ends up in the wrong hands. (more after the jump)
Eli Pariser, author of the “Filter Bubble” provides insight on how the personalized web is shaping our identity. He argues that what is good for consumers are not necessarily good for citizens (18). The Internet provides us with the answers to our questions, but perhaps this is the problem at hand. Today, we live in a filter bubble that “fundamentally alters the way we encounter ideas and information” (9). On December 4th, 2009 the era of personalization began; our computer monitors became one-way mirrors reflecting consumer interests (3). We assume that when we Google a term, we all see the same results, but algorithm suggests what is particularly best for you (2). Our behaviour has become a commodity to be bought and sold where each click signal sends a stream of information to be auctioned off to the highest commercial bidder (7). Therefore, the Internet is masked as a democratic public sphere that strategically tailors our search results to thereby limit an individual’s access to information.
As more and more records are being transitioned to computer and cloud-based storage, we begin to see an increased dependence on online data for record keeping, personal information, and even history. As the internet continues to resemble a library, the erasure of data from it can almost be likened to the act of burning books: permanently removing the data within from history. This can further be likened to allowing a librarian in the Library of Congress to decide which books can be thrown away, and which should stay, entirely defeating the purpose of the library: to hold all books, regardless of content. The removal of data and results from search engines would not only affect our current generation, however, but will enormously distort the views of future historian and sociologists as well. Our generation’s mistakes, differing views, and economic behavior help to define who we are as a people at this point in time, and help us to learn from one another, and not continue to repeat the same mistakes.
Specifically, this postulates that the cloud of invisibility that existed when modes such as letters were preferred before the invention of the internet was invented has disappeared. The new promise of social connectivity championed by online social platforms such as social media and location sharing application such as Foursquare have gradually decimated individual privacy. Jarvis paints a more conciliatory picture by noting that the new age of openness and sharing heralded by the online connectivity ought to be protected and embraced due to its perceived social benefits. Consequently, he asserts that “we meet people, make friends and stay connected. We spread ideas.
The influence of rapidly growing social media, television, and the internet has taken the world by storm in recent years. Its fascinating development over the years is nothing short of remarkable when you take into account that 20 years ago, only 16 million people in the world were "online", compared to the 2 billion that roam on the internet now. Modern communications technology has now become so familiar and utterly banal, yet there is still this tingling sensation when one receives a text from a love interest on Facebook or WhatsApp. Human identity, the idea that defines each and every one of us, is on the verge of being radically defined by social media. This essay will provide a balanced outlook on the positive and negative effects that social media have had on the behaviour and thinking on humans. The topic is a very controversial one, but the purpose of this is to help readers formulate a view on whether the arguments in this essay benefit society in general, or whether they harm the well-being of the human brain and detach us from reality.
Social networking has now introduced an innovative way of attaining these norms through virtual communities on the Web. Socialization prepares us for our life experiences. It can be considered a reverential foundation for society. We may not agree to some rules in society, but without socialization a civil society would cease to exist. In addition, any influence on the socialization process has a profound effect on how we function as a community, with some of the more notable discovery’s being email and instant messaging.
The digital culture has clearly changed and impacted the ways of modern life by connecting most of the world’s population through various social outlets. These networks can intertwine creativity, politics, values, advertising, religion, personal connection, and the list can go on and on. In many cases the digital culture has made things easier in terms of communication and interacting socially or for business purposes. Certain platforms such as Facebook and Twitter have evolved from connecting and sharing with personal friends to a multifaceted platform that connects one to the world. These types of social networks have in someways created a generation that depends on what I call a “digital significance” and is a intricate part of their existence
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Parascope, Snapchat, and Linkedin are all a part of the huge trend taking over the world. Social media had become big about ten years ago and keeps growing. Social media is not in just one or two countries yet it is worldwide; people in almost all countries are liking statuses and posting updates and pictures. It was indicated that 73% of adults online, 73% of teens online, and 72% of young adults online use some sort of social media (Fleck and Johnson-Migalski 135). With social media came many positive and negative effects. People worldwide are addicted to it, spending hours upon hours on the Internet reading about what other people are doing. The United Nations has declared access to the internet to be
In the twenty -first century, teenagers live in a life of social networking and life’s online. It’s hard to believe how much the world has changed over the decades, especially in technology. Technology helps people to contact relatives and friends from long distance more easily and conveniently. People can now talk to each other from everywhere in the world simply through chat and video calls. By time, internet connections have spread throughout households and social networking such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram has increased gradually. However, the internet and several modern technologies have wasted many times and has hurt the society. Social media plays such a big role in people’s lives that some people couldn’t even imagine
When it comes to individuals, the transition to electronic media has had a enormous effect. Individuals used to be passive observers when it came to print unless they were themselves authors. Now with the advent of Facebook and other social media sites, individuals are not the content creators. People can share all types of information with almost anyone via the internet and increased connectivity. Individuals were able to come together via social media, the internet, and smart-phones to mobilize the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and even more recently the “99%” movement as well, as like minded individuals sought each other out in order to stand against economic disparity. With the transition from print to digital media also came the mass collection of personal data. Individuals are sharing more and more information not only with each other but also financial institutions and retail outlets. This information can and will be shared by those entities in order sell people on items and services they may be interested in, or have been interested in in the past. This has brought up concerns with cyber-security and an individuals rights to