Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Does hamlet struggle with mortality
Does hamlet struggle with mortality
Hamlet and its hidden meaning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Does hamlet struggle with mortality
Writing #6
When one thinks of Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the first image that comes to mind is that of Hamlet gazing into the eyes of Yorick’s skull. This scene has become an icon of the play because of the message behind it. It is arguable that the graveyard scene embodies the essence of the entire play. As Hamlet metaphorically and literally stares death in the face, a pivotal moment occurs where he realizes the meaning of human mortality. Hamlet sees the temporary nature of the human body, the insignificance of rank, and the equality of all humans in death. In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the image of Yorick’s skull in the graveyard scene is so noteworthy because it acts as a reminder of the transience of human life.
As Hamlet stands in the graveyard surrounded by the dead, he is struck with the fleetingness of the human body. He sees a skull on the ground and notes, “That skull had a tongue in it and could sing once” (V.i.75-76). Hamlet realizes that this skull was once a human being with a voice and a
…show more content…
face, but all of that is gone. Hamlet asks the gravedigger how long it takes a human to rot. The gravedigger replies that a body can rot before it is even in a grave. Humans worry about their physical appearances so much, but this shows that one’s body is so temporary that it can decompose as soon as one dies. When Hamlet comes upon Yorick’s skull, he cannot recognize Yorick at all. Death has changed Yorick’s appearance so much that even someone as close to him as Hamlet cannot recognize him. In a play filled with characters worried about deception and appearances, this scene makes Hamlet see that all of these things don’t matter after death. As he looks at Yorick’s skull, Hamlet physically sees that one’s body may seem enduring, but in reality, death can abruptly take it away. While looking at the skulls, Hamlet also realizes that rank and status are just as temporary as appearance.
He wonders about the professions of the skulls when they were living. He says, “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer? Where be his quiddities now, his quillities, his cases, his tenures, his tricks” (V.i.97-99)? Hamlet realizes that the skull he is looking at could have been the skull of a lawyer, but there is no way of knowing now. The skull shows no signs of rank or status from being a lawyer; all the things that the owner of this skull once prided his or herself for are gone. Yorick’s skull, the skull of a court jester, looks no different than that of a lawyer or anyone else of rank. All of the skulls receive the same bad treatment from the gravedigger regardless of what status they may have possessed in life. In this scene, Hamlet understands that while one’s reputation and wealth may seem permanent, none of it stays with anyone after
death. Perhaps the most important realization Hamlet has in the graveyard is all humans are equal in death. All of the skulls have the same disgusting look and the same nasty smell. Hamlet realizes this is how all human’s skulls will end up looking one day. Even Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great’s skulls look and smell the same as anyone else’s look and smell. Hamlet says, “Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander returneth to dust; the dust is earth; of earth we make loam; and why of that loam whereto he was converted might they not stop a beer barrel” (V.i.208-211)? In this line, Hamlet recognizes that someone as great in life as Alexander the Great is just as susceptible to decomposing into the earth and someday becoming the stopper of a beer barrel as anyone else. Though these men were of high renown in life, there is nothing separating them from the common man after death. All people will someday die, and therefore, all people will someday be equal. The image of Yorick’s skull in the graveyard scene of Shakespeare’s play Hamlet is so noteworthy because it acts as a reminder of the temporary nature of humans’ lives. This image helps Hamlet see the fleeting nature of the human body, the unimportance of rank, and the equality of all humans after death. The image of Yorick’s skull powerfully prompts the audience to analyze their lives and to decide if what they are striving for in life is worth it. Though elements of life such as status and looks may seem constant, they are inconsequential after death.
From the appearance of the Ghost at the start of the play to its bloody conclusion, Hamlet is pervaded with the notion of death. What better site for a comic interlude than a graveyard? However, this scene is not merely a bit of comic relief. Hamlet's encounter with the gravedigger serves as a forum for Shakespeare to elaborate on the nature of death and as a turning point in Hamlet's character. The structure and changing mood of the encounter serve to move Hamlet and the audience closer to the realization that death is inevitable and universal.
Hamlet tarnishes his image and sacrifices his dignity as a result of his ploy to fool those around him and avenge his father’s murder. Initially, the character of Hamlet is portrayed as “a soldier” and “a scholar” with “a noble mind”. This description by Ophelia is one that the citizens of Elsinore including friends and family of Hamlet would have open-heartedly agreed to. After all, as Claudius said to Hamlet: “You are the most immediate to our throne...” Hamlet must act in a presentable state at all times so can be in favor with the people in the event that he were to become king. However, after the revelation by the Ghost that “The serpent that did sting thy father's life now wears his crown,” Hamlet is shocked but at the same time confused. He is forced into a conflict between acting and not acting ...
In the beginning of the play Hamlet's view of death is mournful but, as the play continues he begins to think of death as this incredibly terrifying concept, this is clear when he states “To die,to sleep-- to sleep, perchance to dream […] But that the dread of something after death, The undiscovered country of whose bourn” (Shakespeare III i
Hamlet as a Living Death in the Midst of Life in Hamlet by Wlliam Shakespeare
When Hamlet begins discussion with the gravedigger, he is presented with a skull of someone he finds out is rather close and dear to him. It also brought Hamlet to reality with Ophelia’s death, as he resumes discussions with Yoricks skull, he jokingly says “Now get you to my lady’s chamber and tell her, let her paint an inch thick, to this favor she must come. Make her laugh at that.” (170) revealing how one wastes so much time putting make up on their face, to mask over the inevitable aging process; and how ones fate lies within the very ground we stand on at this moment, no matter how great one is.
Much of the dramatic action of Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet is within the head of the main character, Hamlet. His wordplay represents the amazing, contradictory, unsettled, mocking, nature of his mind, as it is torn by disappointment and positive love, as Hamlet seeks both acceptance and punishment, action and stillness, and wishes for consummation and annihilation. He can be abruptly silent or vicious; he is capable of wild laughter and tears, and also polite badinage.
Jean-Paul Sartre and William Shakespeare, while centuries and mindsets apart, both examined through drama the meaning of existence and the weight that man’s actions bear on his soul. In Sartre’s No Exit and Shakespeare’s Hamlet, their characters struggle with the mere concept of death and the mysteries that accompany it as they also struggle to accept choices and decisions made during life. Spirituality and the quest for life’s meaning conflict the protagonists of both works. Sartre and Shakespeare chose symbolic representation of spiritual ideals through props, specifically the bronze ornament resting on the mantelpiece of No Exit’s Hell, and the skull of Yorick, Prince Hamlet’s former court jester. While both catalysts for philosophical introspection, and employed by the authors in similar manners, the ornament and skull are contrasting representations of the uncertainty in death that looms over both plays.
Also in act V, Hamlet and Horatio watch two clowns while they dig a grave. While the clowns dig, they come across a skull. Hamlet pronounces, “This might be the pate of a politician, which this ass now o’er reaches; one that would circumvent God, might it not?” (V.I.66-67). This skull resembled Hamlet’s jester who has passed away over 20 years ago. The skull represented the dead smell in Denmark. This is a turning point in the drama. Everything around Hamlet was falling; first his father, the incest of marriage, and his fair Ophelia.
... So in essence, Hamlet believes that a person’s soul is to go to either hell or heaven, but still part of it is left behind. What part of them that is left behind Hamlet does not specify, but there has to be something since he refers to a dead physical body of an important person having meaning. The finding of Yorick’s skull troubles Hamlet greatly because he remembers him when he was alive, and how he affected Hamlet’s life in a positive way.
Shakespeare’s play Hamlet is a complex and ambiguous public exploration of key human experiences surrounding the aspects of revenge, betrayal and corruption. The Elizabethan play is focused centrally on the ghost’s reoccurring appearance as a symbol of death and disruption to the chain of being in the state of Denmark. The imagery of death and uncertainty has a direct impact on Hamlet’s state of mind as he struggles to search for the truth on his quest for revenge as he switches between his two incompatible values of his Christian codes of honour and humanist beliefs which come into direct conflict. The deterioration of the diseased state is aligned with his detached relationship with all women as a result of Gertrude’s betrayal to King Hamlet which makes Hamlet question his very existence and the need to restore the natural order of kings. Hamlet has endured the test of time as it still identifies with a modern audience through the dramatized issues concerning every human’s critical self and is a representation of their own experience of the bewildering human condition, as Hamlet struggles to pursuit justice as a result of an unwise desire for revenge.
In his tragedy Hamlet, William Shakespeare explores and analyzes the concept of mortality and the inevitability of death through the development of Hamlet’s understanding and ideology regarding the purpose for living. Through Hamlet’s obsessive fascination in understanding the purpose for living and whether death is the answer, Shakespeare analyzes and interprets the meaning of different elements of mortality and death: The pain death causes to others, the fading of evidence of existence through death, and the reason for living. While due to the inevitable and unsolvable mystery of the uncertainty of death, as no being will ever empirically experience death and be able to tell the tale, Shakespeare offers an answer to the reason for living through an analysis of Hamlet’s development in understanding death.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, and moral corruption. It touches upon philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet frequently questions the meaning of life and the degrading of morals as he agonizes over his father’s murder, his mother’s incestuous infidelity, and what he should or shouldn’t do about it. At first, he is just depressed; still mourning the loss of his father as his mother marries his uncle. After he learns about the treachery of his uncle and the adultery of his mother, his already negative countenance declines further. He struggles with the task of killing Claudius, feeling burdened about having been asked to find a solution to a situation that was forced upon him.Death is something he struggles with as an abstract idea and as relative to himself. He is able to reconcile with the idea of death and reality eventually.
In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the influence of Hamlet’s psychological and social states display his dread of death as well as his need to avenge his father’s death. In turn, these influences illuminate the meaning of the play by revealing Hamlet’s innermost thoughts on life, death and the effect of religion. Despite the fact that Hamlet’s first instincts were reluctance and hesitation, he knows that he must avenge his father’s death. While Hamlet is conscious of avenging his father’s death, he is contemplating all the aspects of death itself. Hamlet’s decision to avenge his father is affected by social, psychological and religious influences.
Hamlet is one of the most often-performed and studied plays in the English language. The story might have been merely a melodramatic play about murder and revenge, butWilliam Shakespeare imbued his drama with a sensitivity and reflectivity that still fascinates audiences four hundred years after it was first performed. Hamlet is no ordinary young man, raging at the death of his father and the hasty marriage of his mother and his uncle. Hamlet is cursed with an introspective nature; he cannot decide whether to turn his anger outward or in on himself. The audience sees a young man who would be happiest back at his university, contemplating remote philosophical matters of life and death. Instead, Hamlet is forced to engage death on a visceral level, as an unwelcome and unfathomable figure in his life. He cannot ignore thoughts of death, nor can he grieve and get on with his life, as most people do. He is a melancholy man, and he can see only darkness in his future—if, indeed, he is to have a future at all. Throughout the play, and particularly in his two most famous soliloquies, Hamlet struggles with the competing compulsions to avenge his father’s death or to embrace his own. Hamlet is a man caught in a moral dilemma, and his inability to reach a resolution condemns himself and nearly everyone close to him.
The perfection of Hamlet’s character has been called in question - perhaps by those who do not understand it. The character of Hamlet stands by itself. It is not a character marked by strength of will or even of passion, but by refinement of thought and sentiment. Hamlet is as little of the hero as a man can be. He is a young and princely novice, full of high enthusiasm and quick sensibility - the sport of circumstances, questioning with fortune and refining on his own feelings, and forced from his natural disposition by the strangeness of his situation.