Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is literature important
Why is literature important
Life of pi summary essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is literature important
Life of Pi author Yann Martel has been quoted as saying that fiction is “the selective transforming of reality, the twisting of it to bring out its essence”. The meaning of this quote can be regarded in two slightly different ways, mainly depending on whether or not you’re looking for the in-text or the out-of-text meaning. In-text, Martel is referring to the second version of Pi’s story. The story is made up by Pi in retaliation to investigators, Okamoto and Chiba telling him his original story wasn’t believable enough, and that they felt that Pi was lying to him. Their accusations and doubts of his sincerity enrage Pi, and he concludes that they want to hear a story that is unsurprising, flat, immobile, and most importantly, without animals. …show more content…
After hearing both stories, Pi asks them which they liked better, and when they admit that they liked the version with animals more, Pi responds with, “Thank you. And so it goes with God,” (Martel 317). I believe that this quote means basically the same thing both in-text and out-of-text; that one must have faith. In-text, faith is what helped Pi keep his original story with the animals in print instead of the fictional one with the chef. Despite the story without animals being more realistic, both Okamoto and Chiba had faith that the story with animals was real, therefore they liked it much better and in the end, they used the details from that version t write their report. They believed that the only reason Pi made it out of his situation alive is because he had faith in God, and they in return had faith in him and his story. Out-of-text, I believe Pi’s quote refers to those who have been through incredibly traumatic events, especially events that have caused people to make decisions they usually wouldn’t. When a person goes through something that forces them to go against their moral and spiritual beliefs, that person usually ends up feeling an overwhelming guilt for having done so. The answer that many people who have been in these types of situations come to is faith; by turning to God and asking for His forgiveness, their guilt eases away and is replaced by a sense of understanding. They know that while they may have sinned, they have been forgiven and are still good in the eyes of God. I feel that in this context, the words, “And so it goes with God”, specifically mean that the person is leaving their woes with God and moving on with their
Storytelling is a way of expressing one’s imagination through fanciful adventures and serve a variety of purposes. One important reason is to capture a special moment and endure it but mostly because it unites us and of course entertains us. In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, and Tim Burton’s The Big Fish, storytelling is seen as more important than the truth. Throughout the novel Life of Pi, and the film The Big Fish, it can be argued that the truth is intertwined with the lies in each story to form a new kind of truth. An example of this would be when Pi retells his story to the two Japanese men in a way in which he makes the animals human and introduces a different version of the truth. Both the film and movie also share a unique way of story telling because what they both share is a common moral “quest” which involves the main character, who is usually the hero, must overcome challenges in order to achieve a goal or reward at the end.
Why should reader acknowledge both stories? Martel withheld which story to be the “truth” therefore stating either story to be the sole story would be mere speculation. If one were to assume either story to be the truth, it is dependent on the reader’s mindset, bias, and experience. However what they believe to be the correct answer is an assumption. “You can’t prove which story is true and which is not. You must take my word for it.” ( p.352) There is no way of proving Pi story to be true or to be false. Regardless, we are taking Pi word that he is indeed answering the question. Being the sole survivor of the shipwreck, he alone is the only one who can tell the tale. “So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer? Which is the better story, the story with the animals or the story without animals?” (p.352) Both stories make no difference to the reader,
The reader is meant to think Pi manages to survive about a year at sea with an adult bengal tiger, and considering the reader's knowledge so far in the novel that makes sense. Amazed by this idea, the reader continues, each chapter becoming more, and more intriguing. Until just about the last chapter this novel seems almost logical, despite its unrealistic premise. Yann Martel does such a good job of conveying such convincing information about Pi’s journey with Richard Parker that there is not a thought in the reader's mind that this could just be a story. When the Japanese officials from the Ministry of Transport come, Pi tells them his unbelievable story, and to them it is too unbelievable. They ask him to tell a new story, a more realistic one. And Pi does, one that doesn’t have tigers, zebras, orangoutangs, or hyenas. Instead it is a story of Pi, his mother, the cook from the boat, and the sailor. In this new story Pi is represented as the tiger, his mother is the orangoutang, the cook is the hyena, and the sailor is the injured zebra. As it turns out Pi’s unbelievable story might not be as unbelievable as the reader originally thinks. Pi, as said in the quote above, is twisting his story to bring out its essence whether that is on purpose or
Pi starts a story without animals in which a French Cook, a sailor with a broken leg and his mother are with him on the lifeboat. The cook cuts off the sailor’s leg and eats him, scaring Pi. Later Pi’s mother and the cook have an argument which leads the cook to kills Pi’s mother, throwing her head to Pi. After, Pi kills the cook. Mr. Okamoto notices the similarities in the stories the two men don’t know what to believe. They continue to question for details about the actual sinking of the ship. Pi requests that they choose which story they like best. The two men enjoy the first story, to which causes Pi to begin to cry.
His love and understanding of zoology was the reason he survived on the life raft. Even though Pi went against his morals and ate meat, Pi saw it as necessary to survive. His will to survive and to eliminate all personal boundaries allowed him to do what ever deed needed to survive. And finally using his knowledge of animals as a means of maintaining a psychological level of sanity, which kept him motivated and sane throughout his time at sea. With the extreme circumstances that Pi lived through, and the means he used to cope with them, it is obvious that his choices were
Aesthetically, the fiction which reveals a truth by explicit sermonising rather than as a natural conclusion drawn from the relationships and events it presents, is displeasing, even "immoral." Indeed, Martel's statement is likely to have the opposite effect on his reader, provoking a determined counter-reaction not to succumb to a didactic religious agenda. Surely enough, Life of Pi fails to meet its ambition. As he travels through its pages, apparently on the Damascun road to enlightenment, the reader will not, atheist or already committed follower, experience some major revelation to the spirit, coming to, or restoring, a belief in God.
The author provides this cruel story to make readers completely have another understanding of the first story: Richard Parker is exactly Pi’s alter ago. Behind the same law of the jungle, instead of saying the animals are metaphor of human beings in the first story, it is better to say the people in the second story have different animals’ characteristics. Consequently, when Pi asked those two Japanese that which story they preferred, they both agreed with “the story with animals”, “and so it goes with God.”
First, Pi didnt come up with that whole story about the shipwreck with the humans in his head in those few minutes he was silent. He just changed the characters from the first story from animals to humans in the second one. Each human character matched one of the animals in the real story, and did very similar things that the animals did. The fact that it was humans made the japanese think it was real just because there was no animals in it. So although the second story of the shipwreck seems more realistic, that doesnt necessarily make it any more real than the first
Religion is and always has been a sensitive topic. Some choose to acknowledge that there is a God and some choose to deny this fact to the death. For those who deny the presence of a higher being, “Life of Pi” will most likely change your thought process concerning this issue. Yann Martel’s, “Life of Pi”, is a compelling story that shows the importance of obtaining religion and faith. Piscine (Pi) Patel is both the protagonist and the narrator of Martell’s religious eye-opener who undergoes a chain effect of unbelievable catastrophes. Each of these catastrophic events leaving him religiously stronger because he knows that in order to endure what he has endured, there has got to be a God somewhere.
...h up their session, Pi asks them, “‘So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer?’” The factual or provable existence of God is not necessarily relevant to whether someone should believe in Him. This requirement of proof for belief is typical of the agnostic, whose sole belief is that he or she cannot believe either way because there is no proof either way. However, life is a story, and in real life, there must be a story to tell. When it comes to Life of Pi, there is hardly any difference between life and story, so how could the novel not mimic life, being the story of a life itself? A life perhaps embellished to become better, just as readers must embellish their own lives in favor of the better story.
Undoubtedly, Pi’s story with Richard Parker has many facts that are scientifically invalid. First of all, the fact that Pi could possibly be able to tame an adult Bengal tiger on a lifeboat is hard to believe. Mr. Okamoto states, “Not a trace of it [Richard Parker] has been found” (296). If there was a tiger, there would at least be paw prints leading to the point of where he supposedly disappeared into the jungle. Furthermore, the carnivorous island is scientifically impossible. Pi’s story states that on the island there were carnivorous trees, fish-eating algae that produce fresh water, and tree-dwelling aquatic rodents. When Pi discusses these with the two Japanese men, Mr. Okamoto states, “These things don’t exist” (294). Pi agrees that the reason he is in disbelief is because he hasn’t seen them. The possibility that Pi coincidentally found an island filled with anomalies that defy science and no one else has found them as well makes it hard to believe. Lastly, the encounter with the Frenchman is near impossible. The chance...
In Life of Pi, Pi is influenced by the decisions that animals make while onboard the lifeboat and the humanlike characters that they represent in Pi’s factual story. Many readers believe that the story of the animals is just a figment of Pi's imagination and that it was just something to keep him alive. Others believe that the story of the animals really did happen in Pi's time on the Pacific Ocean. No one will ever know what the real story of Pi's journey was, but everyone who has heard about Pi's multiple stories will have their own opinions and interpretations of what really happened.
The Life of Pi, written by Yann Martel, is the story of a young man, Piscine, or Pi for short, who experiences unbelievable and unrealistic events, which are so unrealistic ambiguity is aroused amongst the reader. Duality reoccurs over the course of the novel through every aspect of Pi’s world view and is particularly seen in the two contradictory stories, which displays the brutal nature of the world. Martel wonderfully crafts and image of duality and skepticism though each story incorporated in this novel.
In the first place, Pi spends more time telling the animal story, instead of the true account, which shows that he prefers a zebra, a tiger, a hyena, and an orangutan over the real people involved because with real people the tragic events must also be real. While telling his story to the two Japanese men investigating him once he
In conclusion, the main idea in Life of Pi is that having the will to survive is a key component to survival. The three ways this is shown is through symbolism of the colour orange, having religion on the protagonist’s side and the thirst and hunger experienced by the protagonist. Things do not always happen the way one would want them to happen: “Things didn’t turn out the way they were supposed to, but what can you do? You must take life the way it comes at you and make the best of it” (101) Faith determines ones destiny and nothing can be changed about that, one can live their life to the fullest and enjoy every moment and not regret it. No matter what faith throws at one, as long as they have the will to survive they can pull through anything.