Life Of Pi Vs Big Fish Analysis

313 Words1 Page

Storytelling is a way of expressing one’s imagination through fanciful adventures and serve a variety of purposes. One important reason is to capture a special moment and endure it but mostly because it unites us and of course entertains us. In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, and Tim Burton’s The Big Fish, storytelling is seen as more important than the truth. Throughout the novel Life of Pi, and the film The Big Fish, it can be argued that the truth is intertwined with the lies in each story to form a new kind of truth. An example of this would be when Pi retells his story to the two Japanese men in a way in which he makes the animals human and introduces a different version of the truth. Both the film and movie also share a unique way of story telling because what they both share is a common moral “quest” which involves the main character, who is usually the hero, must overcome challenges in order to achieve a goal or reward at the end. …show more content…

In Life of Pi, storytelling is told through the eyes of Pi Patel, who’s the main character. He gives such a bewildering story with many descriptive details that it’s hard to believe. He starts his story off by him surviving the shipwreck, jumping into a life boat with a zebra, hyena, tiger, and an orangutan. One important factor to consider is how he documents his journeys in a journal which he finds in the survival kit on the lifeboat. This is relevant because this might have served a role in keeping him sane as writing down his experiences gave him some sort of relief. Towards the ending of the novel we see Pi being interviewed by two Japanese reporters, Mr.Okamoto and

Open Document