Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection about life of pi
Life of pi book and movie comparison
Book and film comparisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection about life of pi
Imagine if a young Indian boy who was lost at sea told you that he spent Almost a year living on an 8 by 26 foot lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. Do you think you would believe his story, or would you think it was all a part of his imagination? In the novel ”Life of Pi” , The protagonist tells the readers two different stories and gives them the option to choose which story they believe is the real one. He gave one story including animals and bizarre events, and another story that included other humans and events that seemed more realistic. Although the second story he told seemed more likely to really happen, The first story he told, which included Richard Parker, is the real story of what happened. The story including Richard parker is the real …show more content…
This is probably the biggest reason for believing that this story is the real one. One example of this is how in detail and how many facts he included about dealing with Richard parker and how he domesticated him. He included many facts about tigers and many actions that you would experience when dealing with a tiger. He also goes into very deep detail about the days he spent in the boat and on the carnivorous island. The explanations about the meerkats, the algae, and all of the other stuff that happened on the boat were very specific, and would be difficult to just make up off the top of his head. So, the very descriptive details about the events in the book including on the boat, the island, and about Richard parker are one of many reasons why Pi’s original story was the first …show more content…
First, Pi didnt come up with that whole story about the shipwreck with the humans in his head in those few minutes he was silent. He just changed the characters from the first story from animals to humans in the second one. Each human character matched one of the animals in the real story, and did very similar things that the animals did. The fact that it was humans made the japanese think it was real just because there was no animals in it. So although the second story of the shipwreck seems more realistic, that doesnt necessarily make it any more real than the first
Both the book and the movie show that the story mostly took place on the cay.But the movie started with Phillip on the boat with his mother and when the story started Phillip and his mother had not left yet.Both the story and the movie and the movie described the boat Timothy and his mother was on.But the movie described it differently than the book.
...if his choice of details was intentional or not he told the story to the point that the reader can feel as if they are apart of it.
Storytelling is a way of expressing one’s imagination through fanciful adventures and serve a variety of purposes. One important reason is to capture a special moment and endure it but mostly because it unites us and of course entertains us. In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, and Tim Burton’s The Big Fish, storytelling is seen as more important than the truth. Throughout the novel Life of Pi, and the film The Big Fish, it can be argued that the truth is intertwined with the lies in each story to form a new kind of truth. An example of this would be when Pi retells his story to the two Japanese men in a way in which he makes the animals human and introduces a different version of the truth. Both the film and movie also share a unique way of story telling because what they both share is a common moral “quest” which involves the main character, who is usually the hero, must overcome challenges in order to achieve a goal or reward at the end.
An id and ego split is also shown between Pi and Richard Parker. Richard Parker is an imaginary tiger that is created by Pi in order to keep him alive and focused on staying alive. Pi eventually abandons his superego and partakes in eating meat, even though he was a strict vegetarian prior to being lost at sea. Over the duration of Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, the story relates to Freud’s theories in several ways that are made blatantly obvious; these relations are what makes this story come together to keep the reader involved and interested. Works Cited Martel, Yann.
Mr. Patel continues explaining how his father contracts a Japanese ship to transport his family, along with a number of their zoo animals, from India to Canada in order to avoid political upheaval. While traveling, the ship began sinking and Pi was the only one to manage to make it onto the lifeboat and survive the wreck. The disaster left Pi, along with a few animals, to be the only survivors all in one lifeboat.... ... middle of paper ...
...the other because you find It more interesting, more intriguing. Just like this Pi told his story using his imagination, it allowed a more beautiful story. After all Yann Martel did say “Lack imagination and miss the better story.”
Pi was afraid and surprised that Richard Parker was in the boat once he had lifted the blanket. Then Richard Parker had roared at him and tried to attack by his claws ,but pi had gotten away as soon as he did. Pi and Richard Parker started to roamed slowly around the boat in the middle of the ocean. Pi didn't trust Richard Parker because he knows that he only wanted to kill and eat pi. Pi tried to get rid of the tiger and then he tried avoiding the tiger, but as time goes on he got tired of trying get rid of Richard Parker. So then he began tame the tiger by using his whistle he had gotten from his locker. As he and Richard Parker started to get along through the past days,they have become really close friends.
...h up their session, Pi asks them, “‘So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer?’” The factual or provable existence of God is not necessarily relevant to whether someone should believe in Him. This requirement of proof for belief is typical of the agnostic, whose sole belief is that he or she cannot believe either way because there is no proof either way. However, life is a story, and in real life, there must be a story to tell. When it comes to Life of Pi, there is hardly any difference between life and story, so how could the novel not mimic life, being the story of a life itself? A life perhaps embellished to become better, just as readers must embellish their own lives in favor of the better story.
The son of a zookeeper, Pi Patel has an encyclopedic knowledge of animal behavior and a fervent love of stories. When Pi is sixteen, his family emigrates from India to North America aboard a Japanese cargo ship, along with their zoo animals bound for new homes. The ship sinks. Pi finds himself alone in a lifeboat, his only companions a hyena, an orangutan, a wounded zebra, and Richard Parker, a 450-pound Bengal tiger. Soon the tiger has dispatched all but Pi, whose fear, knowledge, and cunning allow him to coexist with Richard Parker for 227 days while lost at sea. When they finally reach the coast of Mexico, Richard Parker flees to the jungle, never to be seen again. The Japanese authorities that interrogate Pi refuse to believe his story and press him to tell them "the truth." After hours of coercion, Pi tells a second story, a story much less fantastical, much more conventional — but is it more true?
Metafiction generally uses a technique where the storyteller is allowed to do certain things while embodying the role of the narrator, for example, commenting on the story while it is going on and changing it to suit the intended audience. Pi’s first-person account of the days spent on the open sea is replaced, by Martel, with a fictional story in place for the more realistic story to suit the main audience. “‘So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can’t prove the question either way, which story do you prefer? Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals?’… Mr. Chiba: ‘The story with animals’” (Martel, P.317). This introductory framework of Martel’s narration on Pi’s first-person account of the days spent on the open sea contradicts the end of the novel, when Pi reveals the more realisti...
This unimaginable tale, is the course of events upon Pi’s journey in the Pacific ocean after the ship that Pi and his family were aboard crashes, leaving him stranded with a tiger named Richard Parker, an orangutan, a zebra, and a hyena. Pi loses everything he has and starts to question why this is happening to him. This is parallel to the story of Job. Job is left with nothing and is experiencing great suffering and he begins to demand answers from God. Both Pi and Job receive no answers, only being left with their faith and trust. To deal with this great suffering Pi begins to describe odd things which begin to get even more unbelievable and ultimately become utterly unrealistic when he reaches the cannibalistic island. Richard Parker’s companionship serves to help Pi through these events. When the reader first is intoduced to Richard Parker he emerges from the water, making this symbolic of the subconscious. Richard Parker is created to embody Pi’s alter ego. Ironically, each of these other animals that Pi is stranded with comes to symbolize another person. The orangutan represents Pi’s mother, the zebra represents the injured sailor, and the hyena represents the cook. Pi fabricated the people into animals in his mind to cope with the disillusion and trails that came upon him while stranded at the erratic and uncontrollable sea,
In the first place, Pi spends more time telling the animal story, instead of the true account, which shows that he prefers a zebra, a tiger, a hyena, and an orangutan over the real people involved because with real people the tragic events must also be real. While telling his story to the two Japanese men investigating him once he
Truth is not highlighted as a major theme in Life of Pi until the last part of the novel, when Pi retells the entire adventure to make it more believable to the officials who are questioning him. He then asks the officials which story they prefer, since neither can be proven and neither affects the information they are searching for on how the ship sunk. This question implies that truth is not absolute; the officials can choose to believe whichever story they deem true, and that version becomes truth. Pi argues to the Japanese officials that there is invention in all “truths” and “facts,” because everyone is observing everything from their own perspective. There is no absolute truth
The personas in both of the text go on various discoveries and both learn new things about themself and the world around them. Real discoveries come from chaos and moving beyond our comfort zones as well as the capacity of people to challenge themselves and exercise curiosity. In doing so an individual may often rediscover the uniqueness of an experience and acknowledge something that other individuals may not have experienced before. This can be seen in Pi’s capacity to rediscover and meet the challenge provoked by nature during his survival on a boat.
But when the reader picked the human story and believe that’s what really happens to pi, the reader takes the disturbing option, seems like the book loose. But think again, because more than half of the book was the detail of the animal story, and it was part 2, the human story is at the middle of the part 3. So any reader who hasn’t read the book must take or believe the animal story in the first place, the reader will think the story is between a kid and a tiger, the reader will believe what happens in the part 2 of the book is what happens to Pi. No matter what is the reader’s final perspective to the story, when the reader was reading the part 2 of the book, the reader is believing the animal story, picking the universe that moral lines go first, following the will of the