Xenophon And The Ten Thousand Analysis

540 Words2 Pages

Xenophon and the Ten Thousand intended to help Cyrus take the Persian throne from Artaxerxes, Cyrus’s brother. Though the Ten Thousand came out with a tactical victory, Cyrus’s death reverted this victory to a loss and the expedition failed. The exiled Spartan general, Clearchus, and other Greek officers regained relative control over the troops but met with death at the hand of the traitor Tissaphernes.
After these deaths, Xenophon and a few other officers were elected to lead the Ten Thousand back to Greece. Despite being stranded in barren deserts and difficult mountain paths, Xenophon led the men toward the Black Sea and the relative safety of the Hellenic cities there. He continued on this path despite the King’s armies’ attacks and the hostility of the natives. The men seem to favor Xenophon until they blame him for the lack of payment for their work. He defends himself and eventually returns home. Once in Greece, he is asked to help capture Asidates which, according to the soothsayer Basias, should be easy.
Cawkwell’s introduction mentioned that other historical writings of the “Persian …show more content…

As such, it is possible that in writing his “version” of events Xenophon used The Persian Expedition as an apologia. Xenophon’s writing centers around himself and his greatness. His purpose could also have been simply to record the events and people of the expedition. As a military history, it could be seen to exemplify a Socratic philosophy while teaching the principles of leadership and government shown by an army. Both purposes are difficult to substantiate as Xenophon did not state his formal purpose for writing. However, one could argue that this book gave Philip of Macedon the belief that a small, disciplined Greek army could overtake a much larger Persian army generations after its

Open Document