World trade organization is a global organization that deals international trade. It set rules and policy that govern how trade should be transacted on the international market (McMichael, 17). It is involved in the negotiations of the agreements that cut across different nations. The core functions of this body is to make sure the producer get and ample market beyond borders to sell his/her good and services and the buyer(customers) access the international market without many barriers. The body also makes sure the service firms which deals exports and import conduct their duty in a professional manner so that there is no delay or the rules that have been set are not violated.
The WTO was formed on first January, 1995 to deal with liberalize global market. This organization replaced an old organization which formed immediately after the World War II to address the economic challenges which the world was facing that time after the war. These challenges are; unemployment, unfair trade, investment challenges and disputes among different nations. This organization was called international trade organization. It was formed alongside other global development agencies i.e. international monetary fund and the World Bank. These two i.e. World Bank and IMF focused on development agenda and ITO on trade. However, ITO did not get the approval of few nations so that to become a global organization under the United Nations that was purely to dealing with trade (McMichael ,22). Due to lack of global appeal and approval, the ITO went under, and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) replaced it. This is because the GATT seems to be an easy way to get global appeal and it could deal with the current events without manipulation from any or...
... middle of paper ...
... unplayable loans.
However, on the other hand, as much as the world trade organization has been committed and determined to form the CNS of trade and commerce for its member countries through policies, it has been exceedingly hard as national interests and policies override the organizations’. This has subsequently hampered the organization’s pursuit to equal development between member states. The concept of FDI has not been fully harnessed due to the complexity found within the concept. It has been felt that host countries have been the key beneficiaries of FDI at the expense of the investor’s country. Profits are ploughed back within the host country’s economy as investors pay licensing fees and other charges to the authorities of the host country with little to plough back to their mother countries. This has hugely compromised the concept of FDI (Helpman, 54).
Trade is the most common form of transferring ownership of a product. The concepts are very simple, I give you something (a good or service) and you give me something (a good or service) in return, everyone is happy. However, trade is not limited to two individuals. There are trades that happen outside national borders and we refer to that as international trading. Before a country does international trading, they do research to understand the opportunity costs and marginal costs of their production versus another countries production. Doing this we can increase profit, decrease costs and improve overall trade efficiency. Currently, there are negotiations going on between 11 countries about making a trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific
One of the most well accepted models of FDI is Buckley and Casson’s (1976) internalisation theory, who developed a model of MNCs and FDIs centered around the interrelationship between market imperfections, knowledge and the internalisation of production and consumption (Buckley and Casson, 2009). Specifically, the theory recognized that multinational corporations are both horizontally and vertically organized, and that the “the vertically integrated firm internalises a market for an intermediate product, just as the horizontal MNE [multinational enterprise] internalises markets for proprietary assets” (Caves, 1996: p.13). In addition, internalisation will occur, and multinational corporations will expand only as far as the advantages, including barriers to entry, are not offset by the costs of control, communi...
The IMF and the World Trade Organization purpose are to keep countries up and running to serve a purpose of supply and demand. The purpose of the WTO is to ensure global trade commences smoothly, freely, and predictably to help better the countries employment rate, healthcare, and the country’s economy. The IMF makes loans so that countries can maintain the value of their currencies and repay foreign debt. These two organizations contribute to the money shortages that cause global issues such a poverty, civil issues, and unfair trade. The WTO and the IMF are supposed to help stop or possibly end global issues that are affecting everyone’s life
Moran, T. (2005). How does FDI affect host country development? Using industry case studies to make reliable generalizations. Does foreign direct investment promote development, pp.281--313.
The article examines some of the influential theories in the domain of international trade including hyperglobalisation and comparative advantage. The publisher was keen to demonstrate how the theories need to be embraced since hyperglobalisation promotes investments flows from partners pursuing such trading agreements. The trading partners can still reduce their operation cost such as transportation while still navigating the complexities of hyperglobalisation. The author also endeavored to demystify the terminology of comparative advantage by issuing examples and previous concerns reported on the subject. It has been hailed that the traders often traded as per their factor endowments by concentrating on spheres of their specialty. The author also hinted to the readers that the theory of comparative advantage is a major concept since it is the first theory that economics students are briefed on. Arguments in support of the theory reveals that countries that have this level of visibility stand to benefit massively once they specialize in areas of their specialty. He purp...
International trading has had its delays and road blocks, which has created a number of problems for countries around the world. Countries, fighting with one another to get the better deal, create tariffs and taxes to maximize their profit. This fighting leads to bad relationships with competing countries, and the little producing countries get the short end of this stick. Regulations and organizations have been established to help everyone get the best deal, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), but not everyone wants help, especially from an organization that seems to help only the big countries and those they want to trade with. This paper will be discussing international trading with emphasis on national sovereignty, the World Trade Organization, and how the WTO impacts trading countries.
The escalating liberalization of international trade that occurred during the decades following World War II under the impulse of various multilateral agreements and organizations has brought about a dramatic change in the geographic scope of logistics and freight transportation systems. While new trade ties have emerged with East Asia, long-time trading partners such as the United States and European nations have also intensified their trade relationships, to the point that the European Union is the largest trading partner of the United States and this trade represents 4% of U.S. gross domestic product (BEA, 2010).
There is no dout that foreign direct investment (FDI) plays a very significant role in economic growth, according to experiences of new industrial countries in Asia. Over a decade of opening for FDI, we could realize that the more FDI inflows pour into our country the more we benefit. In fact, FDI has contributed a great proportion to fulfill targets on socio-economic development plan and has been one of the most important external sources of Vietnam on the process of industrializing and modernizing the country.
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
For example, states remain the key negotiators and entities in major global governance entities. Additionally, states retain compulsory power over their subjects or constituents, a form of control that new players in global governments have generally not obtained. Globalization has led to several substantial changes in global governance and the entities participating in governance activities. First, over the past 70 years, an increasing number of nations have signed onto international agreements. For example, when the Global Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was created in 1947, it had no institutional structure; by 2009, though, more than 150 nations – accounting for 97% of world trade – were members of GATT’s successor, the World Trade Organization (Fidler, 2009).
Created in 1994, the WTO is already among the most powerful, reserved, undemocratic bodies on earth. It has been granted with vast powers, which include the right to judge whether laws of nations are impairments to trade, by WTO standards. They rule laws concerning public health, food safety, small business, labor standards, culture, human rights, and other social and economic procedures (Krugman and Obstfeld 23). If any of these laws proved to be harming to trade, the WTO can demand their nullification, or enforce very harsh sanctions.
The reason is to take advantage of the exchange goods and the services produced in the field of specialization of a country which has the comparative advantage in each of the country itself. This specialization will be improving the living standards of a country. While foreign direct investment is considered as the main element for the industrial development and economic growth of a hostcountry. According to Rosa Portela Forte , " Foreign direct investment (FDI) influences the host country’s economic growth through the transfer of new technologies, formation of human resources, integration in global markets, increase of competition, and firms’ development and reorganization". In a previous study on the economic activity between countries and the international trade, there are two aspects of possibility of a chain between FDI with the trade.
Cohen (2007) describe in their research that FDI is just not only a source of Financing. For the developing country an FDI is not only a source of funding, the country can gain skills that can help the people of the country in a long-term basis. Such skills can be classified into different categories such as technology, organizational & management practices, exposure to different working styles & standards and lastly the access to different markets. Before the transition economies crisis (Russia), the inflow of FDI peaked up to 60% of private capital flows in developing economies according to Carkovic and Levine (2005). However the role of FDI inflow has been quite unclear that whether it has a positive or negative role upon the economy of
trade between member countries is regulated, free and fair. Their main aim is to provide trade
International organizations create space for its members to coordinate interests and actions which helps promote interdependent relationships among them and strengthens their legitimacy. As society has progressed, it has globalized, and in the past 50 years states have had to address their growing dependence, especially in the economic sector. The World Trade Organization (WTO), is an institution which has an immense impact on the international political economy and the way states function within the international system. It organizes agreements and treaties which govern how its members decide policies, tariffs, and keeps states accountable for their actions. For example, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), determines how states can regulate their import and exports. (Hurd 2014,