Woodrow Wilson's Lie In World War I

519 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Economic impacts for the us of the first world war

Wilson’s Lie

Woodrow Wilson lied about America’s involvement in World War I. Being president at the time, he told his people that America would not get involved in the war. America ended up getting involved in the war, because of Wilson. There are both reasons that it was ok for Wilson to lie and there are are reasons that it was not ok for him to lie. A reason for it being ok, is because he won the war with a great payout and low cost of lives. A reason for it not being ok, is because if the people do not think they are going to war, then they do not have time to prepare for it.

World War I was won partly by America’s involvement, and at a low cost of life. America became involved in WWI in order to gain allies and for economic reasons. America allied with the winning countries of the war, so they owed America debt for helping them with the war. German U-boats sank the Lusitania, an American ship that had nearly 1000 men on it that was crossing the Atlantic. America did not want Germany interfering with their trade, so they joined the war. In this case, it was ok for Woodrow Wilson to lie to the people about getting involved in the war, because he won the war at a low cost of lives and great payout. By not telling the people, mass panic is avoided. …show more content…

The people of America are convinced and don’t expect to have any trouble with war involvement. This does not give them time to prepare for the war. Families need to know if a war is coming so they can prepare to take care of the gardens while the men are overseas. When America joined the war, Women and children had to take care of the

Show More
Related

  • Wilson's 14 Points vs. the Treaty of Versailles

    1243 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wilson's 14 Points vs. the Treaty of Versailles. When the peace processes were to start after the end of World War One, there were four people who were major components in the treaty of Paris: Clemenceau, George, Orlando, and Wilson. Clemenceau wanted revenge on the Germans by punishing them through the treaties because he believed that they were at fault for the war; George was in agreement with Clemenceau although he did not feel that Germany should suffer severe punishment; Orlando who wanted the irredenta to be re-established; and President Wilson of the United States of America wanted to create a mild peace with Germany in a fair way. In view of this, Wilson created fourteen points that he wanted accomplished in full as a result of the peace treaties. His fourteen points were his plan for a world peace and included plans for the end of secret treaties, freedom of the seas, free trade, arms reduction, the just settlement of colonial claims, the establishment of a League of Nations, and the evacuation of occupied territories and national self-determination.

    Read More

  • Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt's Imperialistic America

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    American taking part in imperialism gained its motion from both economic and cultural justifications that stemmed from America's history of expansion; American imperialism only varied slightly in the first few generations of presidents as we will explore sampling from Theodore Roosevelt's presidency on into Woodrow Wilson's presidency. American's previous western expansion became the breeding grounds for American imperialistic justification. Though cultural justifications were used to keep the public interest in support of imperialism economic justifications were viewed as more important throughout the history of imperialism, even in uniting the similarities of Theodore Roosevelt's and Woodrow Wilson's imperial agendas.

    Read More

  • The Ideas Of Luce And Wilson Vs. Wilson's War

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    Based on Wilson’s war message to Congress, It was believe that the United States had a moral and humanitarian obligation to intervene in World War I and “make the world safe for democracy” (Wilson). Luce’s point in The American Century was not imperial, but idealistic. It was America’s time to shine, “to be the powerhouse from which the ideals spread throughout the world and do their mysterious work of lifting the life of mankind from the level of the beasts to what the Psalmist called a little lower than the angels” (Luce). Both sources demonstrate that the ideals of Woodrow and Luce inspired many Americans and shaped much of the foreign policy for the remainder of the twentieth century and on. The more significant viewpoints are the differences.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of President Woodrow Wilson And Franklin D. Roosevelt

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    The issue both Presidents faced was whether or not to enter any of the world wars. Both president Woodrow Wilson and Roosevelt felt remaining neutral and not involving themselves in European affairs was the best solution. Wilson himself stated that “the United States must be neutral in fact as well as in name …” for entering the war was not something he or the American

    Read More

  • Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act (Amendment) of 1918

    1469 Words  | 3 Pages

    On April 2nd 1917, President Woodrow Wilson of the United States of America, ??went before Congress and called for a declaration of war. Both the House and the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of going to war with Germany.?# This was an act that led to much resistance among the American people. Not four months earlier the American people re-elected President Wilson, partly because of his success in keeping the United States out of this European war. However, a series of events, such as the Germans continuing submarine warfare and the attacks on five American ships, led President Wilson to sever diplomatic relations with Germany and send the United States into what would be labeled as World War I. As a result of the war the

    Read More

  • U.S. Neutrality in World War I

    488 Words  | 1 Pages

    When World War I broke out in Europe, Woodrow Wilson announced that the United States would stay out of European affairs and remain neutral. Wilson was aware that the United States had no interest in the matters that did not directly affect the interests of American citizens. He hoped that the United States would remain neutral and continue to trade with warring nations. The American view of neutrality meant we were entitled to safely and freely trade with either side at war as long as it was out in the open seas. The United States hoped to stay out of the way because war was viewed as wasteful, irrational, and immoral.

    Read More

  • Security Against Democracy The Legacy Of The Cold War Analysis

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Elaine Tyler May in her article Security against Democracy: The Legacy of the Cod War at Home, the cold war made an impact on Americans state of mind. During the nuclear arms race, many Americans became paranoid about their own country as well as foreigners . Instead of trying to get rid of this situation and mediating it , America decides to join this race, which only fuels the fire. At the same, American citizens were living their lives in fear everyday. Citizens were preparing themselves in case of an attack, as a result of the government doing nothing to try to protect America. Elaine Tyler May also states that the media back then was only fueling this phobia to grow. For example, the Los Angeles Times showing hypothetical bomb targets if the Soviets were to attack in Los Angeles. Some Americans, who were considering the possibility of a nuclear war, modified their homes into concrete to resist an atomic blast, created backyard bunkers, or even sheltered in their basements. In addition, whether you were for or against the buildup of nuclear weapons, fear would be present.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Arthur Link's Book, Woodrow Wilson Revolution, War, and Peace

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his book, “Woodrow Wilson Revolution, War, and Peace” by Arthur Link, Link walks step by step through President Woodrow Wilson’s career beginning from the time he was born and focuses on his role during and after World War I. Through his entire book, Link acts as an apologist for the actions of Wilson as well as argues against the opinions of other historians. Link speaks about Wilson almost as if he idolizes him; as if despite what other historians and public opinion might say that he can do no wrong.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Wilson's Fourteen Points, By Woodrow Wilson

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    World War I, or the Great War, lasted from 1914 to 1918. In harsh battles between some of the world’s strongest economic powers, millions of people were killed and wounded. Woodrow Wilson was the President of the United States during these years, and he yearned for peace. Towards the end of the conflict, Wilson delivered a speech called “Fourteen Points” on January 8, 1918. His goal in doing so was to create some stability in a time of crisis. Even though the leaders of some countries did not jump on board right away, they eventually agreed to signing the Treaty of Versailles, officially ending the war. Through emphasizing peace, security, and freedom, President Woodrow Wilson’s “Fourteen Points” paid off overall, ultimately revealing that

    Read More

  • The Role of National Interest in World War I

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    National interest was a key factor in the explosive beginning of World War One. By looking at the Naval Arms Race, the People’s Revolt in Austria-Hungary and European alliances, it can be shown that national interest was a significant factor in contributing to World War One. The ultra nationalistic views of many countries overruled their ability to act in a just and logical manner. It was in the years following the formation of the Triple Alliance in which the desire and craving for power grew, and created insincere relationships and unrealistic portrayals of other countries intentions.

    Read More

  • Woodrow Wilson and World War I

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson, our 23rd president, became involved in a war that he did not want any part of. Wilson wanted to remain neutral and have peace as in his first term of office. During World War I Wilson’s roles in the war became well known in all countries. Wilson wanted peace more than anything else. In seeking for peace Wilson asked Congress for the U.S. to enter World War I. which may not sound like a peace strategy but Wilson felt it was the only way to stop Germany and gain peace. Wilson wrote his speech for world peace, Fourteen Points, that he was probably most famous for. He attended and played an integral part in The Treaty of Versailles. He was the founder of the League of Nations, which he talked about in his Fourteen Points speech. .

    Read More

  • The Espionage Act and The Sedition Act

    2058 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...Wilson took on the persona of the leader of a “righteous war”, and with much support from the people approached Congress asking for a declaration of war (James and Wells, 26). While not everyone was supportive of the war, the vast majority was extremely pro-war. Congress passed the declaration of war against Germany primarily based on its unrestricted usage of U-boats against American ships. Thus through actions taken by the Germans, the United States would begin its involvement in the Great War.

    Read More

  • Woodrow Wilson War Speech Analysis

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    The speech “War Message” by former president Woodrow Wilson is one of the most memorable speeches of all time. He is able to capture the audience’s attention and really make them listen with the help of many rhetorical elements. Woodrow Wilson is by far one of the best presidents this nation has ever seen and also one of the best speakers of all time. The magnitude of this speech and what it is about gives it such an appeal without even trying. The rhetorical elements of this text such as ethos, pathos, and logos are what gives this speech its credibility, its powerfulness, and its persuasiveness.

    Read More

  • The Treaty of Versailles

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles was a violation of Wilson’s ideals. The Treaty is one of the most important agreements (or disagreements) that shaped 20th century Europe socially and physically. Woodrow Wilson on January 22, 1917 in an address to the United States Senate called for a peace without victors, but the Treaty signed by the participating nations was everything but that. The blame for the war was placed on Germany and justified the reparations that were outlined by the treaty for the war. The terms of the treaty were very harsh to the Germans and they took on great resentment. It was a fragile peace agreement that would be used as fuel to keep hostilities going 20 years later.

    Read More

  • Differences Of Wilson And Woodrow Wilson's Decree On Peace

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    These two outsiders in the First World War have strikingly similar peace documents from their leaders. Lenin’s “Decree on Peace” seems to be a rough draft for Woodrow Wilson’s “Fourteen Points”. The Fourteen Points seem to be an answer to the Decree of Peace statement of, “At the same time… ambiguity or secrecy” in paragraph seven. In this statement, Lenin clearly infers that his decree of peace is not an ultimatum; however, he is open to consider alterations to this decree. Wilson agrees with this statement with the introduction before the Fourteen Points in paragraph five, by stating “The Russian Representatives… as was desired.” The ending of that sentence is key in understanding that this was a dialogue between Wilson and Lenin by the usage

    Read More

More about Woodrow Wilson's Lie In World War I

Open Document