Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical status of women in india
Role of women in traditional Hindu society and caste system
The caste system in hinduism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical status of women in india
In Hinduism, the main Hindu Trinity all have female counterparts who are as important as the male deities are. It is said that they would not be complete without the goddesses. Many Hindus worship goddesses actually, and there are even main sects that are devoted to goddess worship exclusively. However, hinduism is still a predominantly male religion. In society, women have only specific roles and very limited freedom compared to men. The roles of women in Hinduism are directly related to how they are treated. Specific roles give these women specific treatment from men, whether it's either respect or complete control. Although goddess worship and the feminine is the main principle of Hinduism, in reality they have very limited roles in almost …show more content…
Instead, in the ancient times, women actually had quite a bit more freedom and discrimination was based on castes, not by gender. Based on the scriptures, the Rigvedas is an ancient piece of scripture and it does say that historically, there were women philosophers who debated with men and were respected (Gale, 2005). The Manusmçti said that women were denied access to learning, and this was written after the Vedas. This shows that in the ancient times, women were able to get an education and have the same roles as men. In the Vedic age, which was about 3000 years ago, women had roles that were considered prestigious and held a high place in society, and were equal to men (Das, S.). This was also the time when the divine feminine, shanti, came to be (Das, S). Women also got the education that they needed for their caste. For example, people in the Kshatriya caste were typically warriors. The women that were in that caste received martial arts and arms training (Ibid). This would be very typical for that caste and would put them equal to men, both having some sort of martial arts and arms training. At home, women in the Vedic age were considered “samrajni”, a queen or mistress, and had equal religious rites and roles as the men (Ibid). The women could even pursue a path of Vedic studies or they could choose the path of marriage (Ibid). This goes to show that women had almost an equal amount of roles as men. It is quite extraordinary because in a culture, one would usually find that people were barbaric to women in the ancient times and they did not have many roles or choices but that would change in the modern society. However, based on some historical findings it seems to be a bit opposite in
The Han Dynasty and the Gupta Empire had intense social stratification and patriarchy during their reigns, which was similar to each other, but also having contrasting differences. During the Han Dynasty in China, the women were viewed as inferior to the men and had very little rights, since their only role in society was to stay in the household and take care of the children as well as to do the housework. This thus makes the Han Dynasty a very patriarchic society. Social stratification in the Han Dynasty had the scholar-gentry as the highest ranking of all the people, besides the emperor, farmers and peasants a rank lower than the scholar-gentry, and merchants being the lowest ranking in the society. In the Gupta Empire, the women were regarded as inferior to the men and had little rights, which made the Gupta Empire a very patriarchal society. Social stratification in the Gupta Empire had the Brahmin at the top, the
Gender roles have been a predominant factor in our world since the early emergence of human societies whether they are positive or negative. They are based on expectations that societies have over the people in them. The Epic of Sunjata, shows us how men and women are treated almost equally in different forms. Women are praised for their ability to birth leaders, which is similar to the early Greek Society. In most societies, women are treated less equal than men. This was prevalent in the early Indian society. No matter the gender role, it has been shown that any society cannot survive without both men and women.
Most classical society’s political and social organization revolved around the idea of patriarchy, a male dominated social system. This system exacerbated the inherit difference between men and woman and assigned gender roles based on these observations. Men were generally regarded as superior to woman therefore given greater religious and political roles as well as more legal rights. As the natural inverse, women were subordinated and seen as week; their main roles reproductive and domestic. Information about patriarchy in the classical era, though abundant, was, for the most part, written by men, therefore history does not give us an accurate depiction of women’s viewpoints. Four societies of the classical era, India, China, Greece, and Rome, adopted a patriarchal system, however, due to many factors, each developed identifiable characteristics.
A woman was not seen as being equal to a man. This is clear in the laws dealing with marriage. Women were contractually obligated to remain with their husbands only, while their husbands were permitted to have a mistress or second wife. If a woman was caught with another man, she would be drowned (“The Code of Hammurabi”). Another thing that shows that women were not equal to men is the fact that they could be sold into slavery by their husbands at any time. Women did, however, have some rights such as the right to own property and the right to inherit and pass down that property. They also played very important roles in society. Some of these roles included shop owners, bakers, or scribes (Judge and Langdon,
It can easily be seen that while men were considered to be the most powerful and wisest humans and gods, women had the power to significantly influence these men. From Uta-napishti's wife who convinced Uta-napishti to tell Gilgamesh about the plant that would make him young again to the examples mentioned above, several women were put in roles that had important effects on the men they encountered. Of course, this is not much different from the society we live in today. While many may believe that women have still not reached the point of true equality, it is hard to say that they are inferior and the significance of their roles in society is undeniable.
Throughout ancient civilizations, women were lower than men. In some civilizations like Mesopotamia society, women were below slaves. It is not shocking that they would still not be equal to men. In Roman society, women had more independence and people were more encouraging of women being educated in philosophy. In the Hans society, women did not have any freedom. They were required to follow what the men told them. By examining Gaius Musonius Rufus’ essay and Ban Zhao’s essay, the views of women were different. Woman in Roman society had more freedom and women in the Han’s society were required to fulfill her responsibilities.
Women are considered the goddesses of the world; but it is also true that they are not treated as it. It is human nature to try and separate and sort ourselves out into groups or is it a human characteristics. Women have been being ill-treated for many years and used just as things to fulfil the wishes of men. Considering women as goddesses is not enough to give them full women empowerment in the world. In previous time in history women held no value compared to men; their only purpose was to stay home, take care of the children and fulfill their husband wishes. In the 19th century women were expected to have certain roles to fit into and create a “normal” society.
Prior to the use of agriculture, life was extremely different for women. The information that historians have obtained is limited, but there are certain aspects of Paleolithic society that have been discovered and point towards a more liberal lifestyle for women. Generally, a woman’s job was to gather food and tend to her children while her male counterpart hunted. These simple divisions allowed both men and women to play significant roles in hunter-gatherer society, which further allowed women to be held in equal if not greater esteem then men. According to Elisabeth Gaynor Ellis and Anthony Elser, authors of World History: Connections to Today, women also held...
“In Tantric Buddhism, we are dealing with a misogynist, destructive, masculine philosophy and religion which is hostile to life – i.e. the precise opposite of that for which it is trustingly and magnanimously welcomed in the figure of the Dalai Lama.”[1] Within Tibetan Buddhism, there is an inherent contradiction regarding the status of women. Although in many aspects women are seen and treated as inferior to men, several of the ancient and fundamental values of Tibetan Buddhism, and more specifically Tantric Buddhism, emphasize equality of the sexes, universal compassion, and most importantly the significant and essential role of the woman. Tibetan Buddhist nuns have been trying to correct this contradiction for years to remove the inferior and degrading stereotype that defines them and to be seen as equal to men. Beginning with the emergence of Tibetan Buddhism from India until today, the status of women, both physically and symbolically has declined due to the patriarchal system adopted by Tibet. “The mystery of Tantric Buddhism consists in the sacrifice of the feminine principle and the manipulation of erotic love in order to attain universal androcentric power.”[2] In their patriarchal society, the symbol of the woman is used by men now as an instrument; manipulated by men in order to acquire control and power.
The Torah, in general, does not exactly alleviate the situation of women. Many Jewish feminists argue that a big chunk of the misogynistic views of men stem from the exclusivity of God as male. Judith Plaskow says, “There is the fact that we address God as he. And it is not just that we use the masculine pronoun in the absence of neuter ones – we image him in male terms. Thus he is King, Lord, Shepard, Father, etc.” She goes on to mention the incredulous arguments against the ordainment of women. Arguments that stated things like because a Rabbi or Minister is in effect a Godly figure, and since God is used in exclusively male terms, it is not fitting that a woman should take a role in the clergy.
In examining the Buddhist religion, particularly the role of women in Buddhism, it was. quite clear that the religion of Buddhism is practiced very differently from country to country. The sand is Buddhism is a philosophy of life expounded by Gautama Buddha ("Buddha" means "enlightened"). one"), who lived and taught in northern India in the 6th Century B.C. The Buddha was not a god and the philosophy of Buddhism does not entail any theistic world-view.
...ng their own property, they were encouraged to join athletics such as gymnastics, and some rose to be estate managers. They were even capable of participating in religion and could leave the house during holy days. During the Hellenistic age the treatment of women started to lighten up. Many started to realize that they have a greater value including their intelligence (Sacks 264). Chinese women didn’t start to rise up until the 20th century when communism began. Communists believed that women were equal to men; they felt that it would help the population of china to thrive (Dillion 346). The women of Egypt were treated well and did have a say in many of the things that involved them so they didn’t rise up too much more. Unfortunately for the women in India they have never truly risen up. They are still victims of being very subservient to men.
Women’s role in ancient civilization was poor because they had fewer rights than men. Women were seen as weak people by cause of relying too much on their husbands and fathers support. Women were less superior to men back then because their only role was to stay at home and take care of the children’s while their husband had to hunt and protect the village. Back then they thought women were useless because they didn’t have an education, even though they were really smart and they could do impressive things that men couldn’t even do. This is very bad for society and it won’t make it better because if they deny the education and working skills to the women then they are going to have less intelligent people that can help them in the agriculture, architecture etc. If they just gave the same opportunity to women as they gave it to
Looking back in history, it seems like most societies become less conservative and more accepting of their ways as time goes on. While this is true for a vast majority of societies, it isn’t always the case. In fact, comparing ancient Indian society to itself a few centuries later, it appears that instead of becoming more accepting and understanding, they got even more conservative than before. Rather than slowly eliminating gender roles and becoming more accepting of individuality, the Indian society progressed alternatively to what is expected. This transformation of society can be seen in the differences between the Mahabharata and Kalidasa’s play. In the Mahabharata, Sakuntala, the mother of Bharata, is a powerful woman and uses her voice to stand up for herself while in the play, she becomes more subservient and complicit to Duhsunta and the requests of men. Society between the two plays seems like it becomes more focused on the gender roles and
The Role of Women in Society Women are important in our society. Every woman has her own job or duty in this modern society in which men are still the strongest gender. We can t forget that women s life is a lot more complicated than a man s life. A woman has to take care of her own personal life and if she is a mother, she has to take care also about her children s life, too. Marriaged women have lots of worries and believe it or not, they carry out a more stressful life than married men.