Women's March Rhetorical Analysis

887 Words2 Pages

Hi everybody! I’m Edie Berg and this is #SWC. It’s a quick five-minute story about an amazing Jewish woman in history. Thank you so much for joining me today. So, this week has been a historic week for woman and all of women’s movements. As you might know, this podcast is nonpolitical, so I won’t talk about the new President, Mr. Trump. I won’t talk about the inauguration either. But it is impossible to ignore the millions of women who marched as a protestor even more, as a response to President Trump’s words, actions and his derogatory innuendos towards women and their rights. I believe that the women’s march was a lot more than a protest. It was a beginning. A strong powerful action, that regardless of your political belief, women came together. That we are not going backwards in time. We are not going to put up with the rubbish we put up with for the last decades and centuries or forever. We are not going ignored. We are not going to be groped. We are not …show more content…

She is credited with being one of the first people to have this vision well before Zionism was even a word and well before Hertzel came along. She really was a pioneer in those thoughts. She wrote “The New Colossus” in 1883 but that was placed at the base of the Statue of Liberty in 1903 well after she died, 16 years later. I want to thank the Jewish Women’s Archive, as usual, for most of this information. To end today’s short tribute to this Jewish women’s activist. I’d like to read a short excerpt from her book “Epistle to the Hebrews” where she emphasizes that it doesn’t matter if you, yourself, are doing well, if others in the world are suffering. If you don’t’ know, like me, I didn’t know what the word epistle means, epistle means a letter. That’s good to know, so if you ever need to write and epistle instead of a text message, you’ll know what that means. This is an excerpt of Emma Lazarus’ book “Epistle to the

Open Document