Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the holocaust
Rwanda genocide and the Holocaust
Rwanda genocide and the Holocaust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the holocaust
Genocide is the deliberate fixation on a group of people with the intent of causing their destruction. Those targeted by genocide are usually the ethnic minority of their society, or have been marginalized by their society. When genocide happens, the gender that is most commonly associated with the violence is men. Men are the first to be accused of genocidal violence and the first to be tried in a court of law. However, men are not the only perpetrators of genocide, women also have a role in genocidal violence. Although women take part in genocide, many go unnoticed by the international community and by the justice system. Even if these women are held accountable for their crimes, female perpetrators still receive light punishments when compared …show more content…
The Rwandan genocide began on April 7th and was aimed at the mass extermination of the Tutsi people. The Hutus viewed the Tutsi people as aliens and as enemies of the Hutu race. The Hutus believed that the Tutsi were just after power and wanted to enslave them. Rape and mass execution were used as weapons against the Tutsi people during the genocide. Over half a million Tutsi people lost their lives during this event. Pauline aided her state in the destruction of the Tutsi people during the Rwandan genocide. Pauline was accused of kidnapping, detaining, murdering, raping, and torturing the Tutsi people. When brought to trial for her crimes, Pauline was proved to be guilty of the accused crimes and was sentenced to life in prison. When these women’s crimes and convictions are compared, it is clear to see the lack of action from the international …show more content…
The response of the international community in the case of both female perpetrators was skewed and not adequate at all. I do not believe that the international community responded fairly to both situations. In the first case, Irma Grese was sentenced to death. I agree with that decision. She deserved to die, for all the pain and suffering she caused to the prisoners that were under her thumb. In the case of Pauline, the international community did not respond appropriately. I think that Pauline, as well as her daughter and son, should have been sentenced to death. Killing those three people will not erase the crimes that they have done, but it would at least give some closure to the survivors. These female perpetrators who knowingly helped further the ideologies and goals of their state shouldn’t be allowed to live. They didn’t care about all of the lives that they took, so their lives shouldn’t be held to the same level of importance. Furthermore, I think the international community's response was skewed because of socialized gender stereotypes and differences in publicity. I believe Irma Grese received the death sentence because the Holocaust was widely publicized due to the fact that it occurred during a monumental historical war. On the other hand, Pauline didn’t receive the death sentence because the Rwandan
The sentence of five other convicts of the genocide was reduced from 15-25 years to 12 years. The other defendants who did not appeal against their sentence or gave up their appeals. The genocide last four months. The Rwandans are fully responsible for the organization and execution of the genocide, governments and peoples elsewhere all share in the shames of the crime and have stopped the killing campaign. just ended not that long ago.
In the year of 1994 and estimated eight-hundred thousand Rwandans were killed between April and June. There was not a day were the Tutsis was not being killed by the Hutus. Imagine one-hundred days of straight killings of your friends and family. It would leave you in a never-ending nightmare and you would be scarred for the rest of your life. Imagine if you were stuck in a bathroom so small that it could barely fit two people in there but you had five or six more people in there. It would be hot, it would smell, and it would be uncomfortable. Immaculée Ilibagiza had to go through the entire Rwandan Genocide in this type of situation. She barely ate and barely went to the bathroom because if the Hutu heard Immaculée or any of the other girls
In the case of genocides, there are many factors that motivate the perpetrators to kill. In the Rwandan genocide there are many reasons why the Hutus would be motivated to kill the Tutsis. There were reasons, of long standing hatred toward Tutsis, fear of authority and repercussion, economic and many other motivating factors. In the book, Machete Season: The Killers in Rwanda Speak, Jean Hatzfeld explores these many reasons for genocide through interviews with killers. Even though were many motivating factors for the Rwandan genocide, the main motivation for the perpetrators were for economic reasons.
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
"Rwanda, Genocide, Hutu, Tutsi, Mass Execution, Ethnic Cleansing, Massacre, Human Rights, Victim Remembrance, Education, Africa." UN News Center. UN, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.
Russel-Brown, Sherrie. “Rape as an Act of Genocide.” Berkeley Journal of International Law. 21:2 (2003): 350-374. Google Scholar. Web. 28 April 2014.
Former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali once said, "We were not realizing that with just a machete, you can do a genocide." To be candid, nobody anticipated the Rwandan Genocide that occurred in 1994. The genocide in Rwanda was an infamous blood-red blur in modern history where almost a million innocent people were murdered in cold blood. Members of the Tutsi tribe were systematically hacked or beaten to death by members of the Interahamwe, a militia made up of Hutu tribe members. In just 100 days, from April 6, 1994 to mid-July, 20% of Rwanda's population was killed; about 10,000 people a day. Bodies literally were strewn over city streets. Genocide obviously violates almost all articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; however, the article I find most important is Article 3 - the right to life, liberty, and personal security. In just 100 days, one million people were denied the most basic privilege granted to every human – the right to live, simply because they were born to the wrong tribe.
Greenfield, Daniel M. "Crime of Complicity in Genocide: How the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia Got It Wrong, and Why It Matters." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98.3 (2008): 921-24. HeinOnline. Web. 18 Apr. 2011.
SAINATI, TATIANA E. "Toward A Comparative Approach To The Crime Of Genocide." Duke Law Journal 62.1 (2012): 161-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 25 Nov. 2013
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
In the years after the genocide, we as people had questioned our past decisions and our countries decision to stay out of the genocide until it was too late. I too have question my countries decision. Why didn’t the US interfere with the genocide and be the hero my favorite historical anime, Hetalia, made it out to be? I believe not helping the innocent people being murdered in Rwanda was wrong of all the countries of the world but now it is too late to change the past and we can only look to the future. We can look to the future and hope and pray that another genocide never occurs but it’s useless. As long as there are people, there will be hate and as long as there is hate there will be murder.
There are several ethical issues surrounding the decision by the Hutu politicians to start the genocide. It is unfair and unethical for the Hutus to blame the entire Tutsi tribe for the president’s death. The Hutu politicians are so much driven by hatred that they fail to consider the innocent lives to be lost in the planned genocide. Instead, they organiz...
Percival, Valerie, and Thomas Homer-Dixon. "Getting Rwanda wrong. (genocide in Rwanda)." Saturday Night. v110. n7 (Sept 1995): p47(3). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. K12 Trial Site. 12 Apr. 2010 .
Realism is one of the oldest and most popular theories in International Relations. It offers a perspective about competition and power, and can be used to explain the actions between states. An example of realism is the U.S. reaction – or lack thereof – during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Hymowitz, Sarah, and Amelia Parker. "Lessons - The Genocide Teaching Project - Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law." American University Washington College of Law. American UniversityWashington College of Law Center for Human Rights and Humanitaian Law, 2011. Web. 9 Mar. 2011. .