Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of the police officer
Role of the police officer
Role of law enforcement officers in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of the police officer
According to Karl N. Llewellyn and E. Adamson Hoebel, making new laws in our societies helps us to become more discipline and safe and it also prevents us from crimes such as rape, sexual assault or harassment, violent crime fraud, robbery, murder etc due to a larger society which Hoebel called “heterogeneous”. Many people in the modern society can not make their own decisions without hearing or listening to the people in power such as the government (legislatures), police, lawyers/ judges. Just like the “Cheyenne community”, the community they come to together to solve conflicts between individuals by involving individuals or the community as a whole for the protection of themselves.
In the case of the “Wolf Lies Down”, it illustrates a situation between him and his friend. A friend who left his bow and arrow as a sign that he has taken Wolf’s horse, however, a year later, Wolf expect the horse to be back to him, unfortunately, his friend did not show up. So Wolf decided to visit the Elk soldier chief to explain what happened. The Elk soldier chiefs in his society decided to send someone to fetch wolf’s friend. Although Wolf’s friend was aware of the course, he went to the fourth chiefs of the community and the situation between the two was solved. After the conflict was
…show more content…
By using these laws, individuals can be preserved from harms and
Native-American justice systems are very different than the traditional American criminal justice system in that the Native-American systems are “based on a holistic philosophy where law is a way of life and justice is part of the life process” (Melton, 1995). These systems have unwritten laws that are passed down and the process involves a circle of justice that connects everyone as they are focused on the center, which represents the issues that need to be fixed to maintain peace (Melton, 1995). The American system “is based on a retributive philosophy that is hierarchical, adversarial, punitive, and guided by codified laws and written rules, procedures, and guidelines” (Melton, 1995). Since the victim has suffered, it is believed
Policing any community will have many challenges, but policing alongside a Native American tribe can add additional challenges other areas may not experience. In the past Native Americans have had problems with the U.S. government seriously and repeatedly disregarded Indian rights that were guaranteed in the form of binding treaties. To Native American’s police officers have been a symbol of rigid and authoritarian governmental control. They view the justice system as not to be trusted because of the breaches of treaties and contracts. With such tarnished views of the justice system and those who work for it, policing alongside a Native American tribe can face additional problems and challenges.
... of sex crimes. Furthermore, granting tribes full authority to prosecute any crime may create injustice for accused non-native individuals as well as creating more complication between tribes (Gede, 2012).
In some case law we have within our country it has taken the outrage of the community to accomplish changes within certain laws. One of those changes created through victim activism is Megan’s Law, resulting from the rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl by her neighbor who was a known sex offender (Karmen, 2016). The suspect was known to the criminal justice system as being a sex offender, consequently, it was not known to the community where he resided (Waxman, 2017).
There are many people that speed on freeways and throughout the streets without thinking of the consequences that could possibly happen.There are many lives taken by car crashes every day either because the driver was not paying attention,was drunk,or was speeding so they couldn’t stop in time.I have seen many car crashes that have caused fatal injuries because one or both drivers weren’t careful enough and did not follow the law.These laws were put into effect for a reason,to protect the people of America and make them feel safe anywhere that they go.If there were no laws,the world would be full of pure chaos and anarchy and there would be no balance. Every decision that someone makes in life,including following the law,can have a drastic impact on their life and other people’s lives as
The next use of symbolism is the setting of the journey and meeting in the woods. Early Americans looked at the woods as a test of strength, bravery and endurance. It took a lot of courage for someone to enter the forest because it was unknown territory and they would not emerge the same. ?He had taken a dreary road, darkened by all gloomiest trees of the forest?that the traveler knows not who may be concealed by the innumerable trunks?he may be passing through an unseen multitude.? (197) Goodman Brown does not face the dangers of Indians but faces the danger of reality and truth.
Law and social order constitute important elements of social change and theories of criminology (Schmalleger, 2012). Understanding the interplay between them, law and social order, gives us important insights into how and why governments either work or fail. Three different perspectives outline the interplay between the two and help us understand what is happening behind the scenes in various forms of government. These three perspectives are the consensus, pluralist, and the conflict perspectives.
“The rabbits accept their role in the ritual and recognize the wolf as the strong. In defense, the rabbit becomes sly and frightened and elusive and he digs holes and hides when the wolf is about. And he endures, he goes
The warmth of the campfire tickles on their skin. The cricket’s songs echo into their ears from behind the bushes. The Native Americans, hand-in-hand, sit and listen to the stories of their people. Within these fascinating tales are symbols some may not even notice. A Symbol relays a meaning that digs below the surface meaning of something that has a literal meaning of something else. In the short story, When Grizzlies Walked Upright (Source A), the symbol of staying within one’s cultural beliefs is symbolized by the grizzly bears. If the grizzlies had stuck to their beliefs and not taken the spirt chiefs daughter into their keeping, the outcome would have been one with very different consequences. In The Earth on Turtle’s Back (Source C)
Fiction stories are those stories not true or factual and are created by the author. These stories are imagined by the author and narrated to the reader. The reader has the opportunity to add their own imagination to the story to make the reading even more enjoyable. Fiction relies on the imagination of the author and the imagination of the reader along with the elements of fiction. Fiction readings are in the form of realistic and non-realistic. When discussing these two types of fiction readings two stories come to mind. The realistic story that comes to mind is the story of “A & P” by John Updike. John Updike is “…considered one of the best of American writers of fiction and poetry” and his story of “A & P” proves to be an ideal example of fiction (V., and Zweig 370). The non-realistic story is “The Fox and the Grapes”, which is found in Aesop’s Fables. Both of these narratives contain elements of fiction easily identified and therefore entertaining to discuss. Characters and point of view are two of the elements of fiction found in these two short stories. Discussion of these two elements, expand on the knowledge of fiction stories through examples and definitions.
Everywhere in society, it’s simple to find a person speeding down a freeway, see a gum wrapper rolling through the wind, or see someone jaywalking when there are stop lights close by. Frank Trippett, in his excerpt, argues that more and more citizens are breaking small laws such as speeding, littering, and taxes. He continues by claiming social order is disrupted when these laws are broken. He supports his position by explaining how people think violent crime is the only way to disrupt social order. The author’s purpose is to promote the idea that breaking laws like littering and speed limits, are more harmful to society than the people that do it may think, The author adopts a serious tone for ordinary people that are observing people breaking these laws, or the people breaking them. Breaking small laws do disrupt the social order of a society like the author promotes, because the laws are designed to protect the people and the community, and there’s no benefit
In the context of our reading this week regarding cultural diversity within our criminal justice system, I found it very interesting in how the indigenous justice paradigm conflicts with the present day system. In many aspects, there are two dual justice systems in operation here: indigenous paradigm and the criminal justice system. We will examine the two systems differences, as well as, determine if there are any principles of the Native American paradigm that compliments the mainstream correctional initiative.
In today's world law is above everything. Millions Americans would never think of themselves as lawbreakers. But when it comes to tax codes, or laws against littering or speeding or noise pollution, more citizens becoming scofflaws. Trippett in his argument asserts that law-and-order is threatened mainly by violent crime. Author supports his position, by first, providing reasons and examples from real life. He continues by demonstrating how americans reacts to different kinds of laws. His purpose is to persuade the reader, that people should obey all rules, doesn’t matter what they are about. The Author creates judgemental tone for citizens that does not want to follow some laws. Trippett argues that people need to stop saying that they will
It is not expected that everyone will choose to live by the same standards, but if there is a mutual respect for everyone’s beliefs it would be easier to work towards change. Orr talks about the maltreatment that everyone in the civil rights movement received due to the policemen’s opposing beliefs. “If they had actually wanted to protect us, the FBI could have easily arrived any time the preceding day. Many in the movement already knew what was inconceivable to me at the time- that events like this were stage-managed and that the FBI wasn’t a friend or even a neutral ally of the civil rights movement.” (Orr 223) This is a problem because with the lack of enforcement citizens are free to do what they want without receiving any consequences. This of course is only applicable to scenarios that policemen and citizens have the same view on. Regardless if a law seems unjust or disagreeable, it must be followed by everyone. By letting personal civility override the legal system, the opportunity for an altercation is being presented. Oppression is a prevalent issue that is more than often eluded in the legal system. For example, police brutality may be prevailing in a manner that is not agreeable to the public. The reason this may be possible is because policemen may have the same morals as each other, blinding them to their wrongdoings. And while they may consider themselves civilized, citizens may consider them uncivilized. This is why it is difficult to make changes because with everyone’s personal interpretation of civility, it is difficult to come to an agreement. Flammang may agree that, everyone’s view on civility is different also because it is not taught the same. “We are not naturally polite- we teach and learn the rules that grease the wheels of civilizations. Of course, if
A long-term issue in America has recently made a comeback in the news since the Parkland shooting in Florida. This has caused reactions from people with all kinds of viewpoints. Some people lobby for gun control, while others claim they have the right to have guns. Some people dream up conspiracy theories, some go to protests. But the majority of people do nothing. That is the reason that nothing has changed to prevent this sort of thing. it is because the people with the most power to change laws are the least likely to do so. Laws must change in order for massacres to stop.