Trippett's Argument Analysis

In today's world law is above everything. Millions Americans would never think of themselves as lawbreakers. But when it comes to tax codes, or laws against littering or speeding or noise pollution, more citizens becoming scofflaws. Trippett in his argument asserts that law-and-order is threatened mainly by violent crime. Author supports his position, by first, providing reasons and examples from real life. He continues by demonstrating how americans reacts to different kinds of laws. His purpose is to persuade the reader, that people should obey all rules, doesn’t matter what they are about. The Author creates judgemental tone for citizens that does not want to follow some laws. Trippett argues that people need to stop saying that they will

never be law breakers and always will follow the rules, but in reality same people are showing by walking around with the poster, that they don’t want to follow them. However Trippett's argument is invalid, because there always something wrong about the law, so people wouldn’t like it.
Somebody can say, that law is unique, and was created by government for citizens and their safety. If street racers will go out and will say that they want to increase max. speed on highways and streets. That’s would be not safe for anyone else. But what if citizens are does not like this law? What if they want to change it? There are always can be mistakes in the law, and people might not like it. That’s why americans are trying to help government to make laws little more “perfect”.