Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How shakespeare presents attitudes towards shylock in the merchant of venice
The theme of revenge in William Shakespeare's
Different attitudes towards shylock in merchant of Venice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shakespeare’s Intentions Toward His Audience Revenge is a natural emotion for humans when we feel betrayed or angry, but the question is; Does it benefit you? Many people don’t adopt revenge as their last resort and some use revenge like a belief, just like character Shylock in Shakespeare’s book “The Merchant Of Venice”. Shakespeare challenges our emotion and mocks us for our cruel desires through Shylock’s anger and tone. The tone given to the audience is filled with a large quantity of greed and hatred but resembles us when we experience annoyance and want to payback what is owed. Shakespeare mocks one of our flaws that we have the crave for on a daily basis and we Humans cease to see it. Humans can naturally be evil. Most were made like this from their past and that’s what shakespeare is trying to bring to our attention. Shylock plays as the victim who was once tortured and turned to the torturer. Since he was kicked, beaten, and taunted for what his religious beliefs were by character Antonio, he now seeks revenge. Shylock isn’t wrong for having the need for revenge but why is that the first thing that comes to mind? When someone (for example) takes the last cookie from the jar and then teases you because they got to it first, you feel like …show more content…
you’ve been mistreated. You feel humiliated and want to do harm to that person for your own personal reasons. Shakespeare brings this to our attention in the story and uses Shylock as a little angry pawn. Through Shylock, Shakespeare judges us for our flaws. Revenge feels good when you’re the one dealing the damage.
Is revenge even healthy? Psychologically no. In fact, Confucius once said “When anger rises, think of the consequences.”. What people tend to do is get angry and not think of the repercussions. Eventually this leads to many issues that can’t be solved or even someone could end up getting hurt. In the “Merchant Of Venice”, Shylock was owed a pound of flesh and expected that he could get his revenge on Antonio. His “repercussions” though were if he drew a single drop of blood, he could be sentenced to death and lose all of his valuables and owned properties. This shows an example we Humans make on a daily basis, we never think somethings, like revenge,
through. Shakespeare intentionally makes Shylock look bad, but as we see Shylock as an evil, greedy old man, we don’t understand how much hypocrisy we are making. We all have emotions, some revengeful, some forgiving. “ He hath disgraced me and hindered me half a million, laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies—and what’s his reason? I am a Jew.” -Shylock (Act 3, Scene 1, Line 47). We have no right to judge other people based on who they’re and for what their reason is. Shakespeare makes this statement in the story multiple time through Shylock's feelings and we can’t judge him for it. Anger is the source all pain cause to someone, Hate is the most disgusting emotion to have and must be rid of. We Humans cause lots of anger to others on a daily basis, luckily we aren’t the only ones that cause it. Shakespeare proves to us in “The Merchant Of Venice” that we are all equal in anger mentally but should we put our aggressive emotions to good use once it’s about to be used on someone. We shouldn’t use it no matter how satisfied (if it satisfies at all) we feel afterwards.
While revenge may feel sweet at times, in most cases it is destructive to yourself and those around you. The article “Revenge:Will You Feel Better?” makes one contemplate this, and draws the question “is revenge really worth it?” Well, in the article, Karyn Hall suggests that “Revenge can be a strong urge, but you may not feel better if you act on it.” In fact, in a study performed by Kevin Carlsmith showed that “...the students that got revenge reported feeling worse than those who didn't…” With this, one may see that revenge is pointless, and in most cases leaves you feeling worse than the people you performed it
Evil exists naturally in the world, and there are many acts that are considered evil. As a result, evil is often a theme in literature. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe each rely heavily on evil to portray a message. Out of all of the evil acts that exist, exacting revenge is the evilest act that a person can make, for a person’s rash decision to exact revenge will ruin their sense of morality. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes in “Hamlet” each commit terrible acts of revenge, as does Montresor in “The Cask of Amontillado.”
For the meek, vengeance pleasures the soul; however, it is only temporal. Like an addictive drug, revenge soothes anger and tension by sedating the mind with ephemeral comfort. Despite the initial relief, pain ensues and conditions seem worse than before. Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the non-violence movement in India, stated once that “an eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” There is no such thing as a sweet revenge.
Many people percieve revenge to be something that falls under justice, as they are driven by emotions, while others consider getting the police involved as serving justice. Moreover, some people find revenge to be pleasing and satisfying, but to argue the point that just because something is more satisfying does not mean it is
In the words of Harvey Fierstein, “What looks absolutely fabulous in rehearsal can fall flat in front of an audience. The audience dictates what you do or don't change”. Clearly, the success or failure of any work of art depends, almost entirely, on its ability to engage and connect with its audience. Shakespeare, one of the greatest playwrights in history, certainly understood this concept. He targeted his Elizabethan audience skillfully, drawing them in and manipulating the way they interpreted his works. This is evident in one of his renowned plays, Hamlet. Attempts to target the audience are evident throughout the play, but focusing on one speech can provide a greater appreciation for Shakespeare’s deliberate efforts. In act four, scene two, while explaining that Polonius is dead, Hamlet says:
Revenge is an emotion that corrupts the innermost parts of the soul. It is not an emotion that comes and goes, but is a sentiment that is unwavering and perpetual until successfully carried out. Revenge is the hunger that drives someone to inconceivable measures in order to inflict similar pain or suffering to a person who is the center of previous internal sufferings. Although revenge is focused on the original perpetrator, it affects the revenge seeker as well as the victim. The one who seeks revenge is further hurt by the consequences involved with their revenge. Even though revenge may seem to be rewarding, those seeking revenge inadvertently suffer due to their obsession that causes present separation, their insecurity
In the play, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare claims that an act of revenge leads to madness and insanity. Shakespeare’s claim holds true today because nowadays there are real life events cases that affected every adults and teenager and even little kids. These tragedies and nightmares are all caused by the single act of revenge. In today society, you are accountable for what you do and responsibility plays are a big role in our environment. In the play, Shakespeare proved his claim by using the character Hamlet, who is destined to take vengeance for his father’s death and eventually turns into an insane person. His actions lead to the insanity of others characters and affect them physically and mentally.
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
It is difficult to say if Shylock is a complete villain or a victim, as his character is complex and ambiguous. However, it is difficult to view Shylock as anything other than a devious, bloodthirsty and heartless villain in the majority of the play. There are a few points in the story where he can be viewed as victimised, as most Jews were at that time, but Shakespeare has purposely portrayed Shylock as a stereotypical Jew, greedy, and obsessed with money. Shylock has been written to be very inflated and exaggerated. Even when Shylock makes his first appearance in the play, his first words are “Three thousand ducats,” Act 1, Scene 3.
Revenge almost always has the makings of an intriguing and tragic story. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a perfect example of how revenge unfolds and what it unveils. The play tells the story of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle, marries his mother soon after his father’s death. Hamlet greatly disapproves of the hasty marriage and suspects foul play. His suspicions are confirmed when the ghost of his father appears and tells him that Claudius murdered him. Hamlet’s father asks him to take revenge upon Claudius, and soon everything takes a drastic change. The courses of revenge throughout Hamlet surround each character with corruption, obsession, and fatality.
This is where Shakespeare evokes our sympathy, by making us realise how Shylock has suffered because of the prejudices of the Christians around him. He explains his motives for revenge in a rational way, showing how his actions are no different from the Christians'. Look carefully at the language he uses, as well as the insulting and mocking language used by the other two. At the end of the scene, Shylock mourns the loss of his daughter, although our feelings towards him are a bit mixed, for he seems to care more about the money. He does give evidence, however, of his love for his wife, which again, creates sympathy.
Through the contrasting fates of Shylock and Antonio, Shakespeare reveals that hatred and revenge can lead to one’s downfall. The mutual hatred of Shylock and Antonio encourages them to desire revenge. However, while Shylock blindly pursues revenge until his defeat, Antonio reaffirms his moral superiority by giving Shylock an opportunity for redemption. Antonio’s acts of mercy allow him to break away from the destructive cycles of hatred and revenge that once held him captive.
One of the darkest segment of human nature is that we are willing to be led by this natural urge, even if it introduces disastrous implications. Hamlet, initially claims himself to be “very proud, revengeful, ambitious”, which show how he clearly defines revenge as an honourable and spirited act, making him keen to punish Claudius immediately. Hamlet chooses to put on an “antic disposition” as he plans the revenge, but for a long time he finds himself being stuck in “a kind of yeasty collection”. This metaphorical comparison reflects the bubbling, frothing process of fermentation that anticipates results but never happens because the “bubbles are out”. This demonstrates the struggle between Hamlet’s Id, that seeks immediate activity, and his Ego that is concerned about the potential repercussions of his actions and it eventually results in him descending into madness. Shakespeare draws our attention to the idea that vengeance is a subject that must be treated with utmost care and sensitivity because those who act on the unquenchable urges for revenge are defensive, sick and will not be far from their own downfall. Hamlet’s build up of internal frustration and psychological tension causes him to inconsiderately project these negative emotions outwards. For instance, Hamlet bursts in rage to Ophelia, “you make your wantonness your ignorance” accusing her as a frivolous being, and also tells
Shylock is a wealthy Jew who invests money into shipments and trades. When Shylock’s enemy, Antonio, requests a loan of 3000 ducats, “Shylock adopts this Christian model of "kind" lending in his bond with Antonio as a means for lawful revenge.” Shylock’s agreement is that if the ducats are not returned, Antonio must repay his loan in human flesh. This is a way for Shylock to either make money or kill a Christian, either will satisfy him. Lee describes Shylock’s feelings towards Christians, “Indeed, although Shylock will neither "eat," "drink," nor "pray" with the Christians, he is willing to "buy" and "sell" with them.” This is where Shakespeare first introduces the devil inside Shylock. Had Antonio been a Jew, there would not have been a payment of flesh. Shylock’s hatred propels the story from start to finish. His hatred causes him to lose his daughter, drives Portia to use her money and wit to save Antonio, and why he ends up losing
People can be motivated to take revenge on others for various reasons. While these reasons may be considered as very serious or rather trivial, they are all motives for revenge. Revenge occurs when a person has been offended or angered by an individual and in result they have the desire to pay them back. People’s opinions on revenge differ from each other, some may believe it is justified and some don’t. Mahatma Ghandi believed that revenge is not the answer and he stated that “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This quote portrays the opinion that if everyone gets even then there will be no one else; if we all take an eye for an eye everyone would be blind. Revenge can be learnt through real life experiences as well as fiction and can be shown as justice or unacceptable. It becomes difficult to determine when revenge can be justified but is revenge always worth it?