Ken S. Ewert's "Moral Criticisms of the Market", analysis’ how leftist Christians are not supporters of the economic system of a “free market economy.” A free market economy is where citizens, partnerships or enterprises have the ability to freely trade with others based on supply and demand of products. This allows for free competition and choice within an economic system. One of the main themes that Ewert tries to state is that Christians should not oppose the free market system in its entirety. Ewert has many valid points that I would agree with. He believes that although the free market economy does oppose some Christian’s beliefs, it should not deter Christians from participating within this system.
One of the major points that I agree with is the statement made by Ewert stating “It is clear that not all self-directed action is necessarily selfish action” This is a strong statement that has great validity. An action that is self-directed does not mean that it is a selfish act. One example could be a person buying products for themselves within the free market economy. The person has to buy essential materials to survive such as food, clothing, and shelter. The supplier on the opposite end has to have this person to make a profit. In actuality the system is more co-dependent then selfish. To not cause confusion, there are those who abuse their power within the economic system where they either establish monopolies or allow for certain groups to be discriminated against in order to make a profit. Those are instances that do occur. One company that is known for this Wal-Mart, a multi-billion dollar enterprise that is known for causing small business’ to suffer because their prices are much lowers, having substandard health insur...
... middle of paper ...
...eceive products there has to be some type of personal interaction. One example would be charity. This is tied into the market economy it just does not involve monetary funds. Thus it does not mean that impersonal relationships will establish.
In conclusion, Ewert shows rationale to why leftist Christians should not be concerned with the free market economy being detrimental to a person’s morals and ethics and possibly their religion. The free market economy allows for choice within it. The environment is not an excuse that leftist Christians to use to state the free market economy is corrupting human’s morals. Scripturally it is up to the person to allow themselves to not be morally and spiritually corrupted, not an environment or in this case an economy. Leftist Christians have the right motives, however to omit an entire system just because it has some negatives.
John Stapleford’s book, Bulls, Bears, and Golden Calves, provides a thorough overview with a Christian perspective of economic and ethical analysis. He reviews the moral challenges of macro, micro, and international economic issues. Stapleford covers a variety of important public policy issues such as self-interest, economic efficiency, and private property rights. He begins the book by laying a foundation of ethical thought and an analytical framework. Stapleford provides a Biblical perspective on the practical issues facing our current society. For example, there are three billion people in the world who live on less than $2 a day (Stapleford, 2009). The wealthy Americans continue to get richer. The greed and lawlessness of America’s corporate boardrooms is increasing. Legalized gambling continues to increase every year. The expansion of pornography and its accessibility to America’s younger generations has become a rapidly growing epidemic (Stapleford, 2009). This text is grounded solidly in biblical principles. A number of the problems he discusses are not specifically addressed in the Bible, but one of the author's strengths is to develop a Christian rationale for contemporary issues, based on biblical principles. An example of this skill is found in his forceful chapter on "False Hope . . . The Boom in Legalized Gambling" (Stapleford, 2009).
“...this religion is saying that every person, man, woman, child, slave, barbarian, no matter who, is made in the image of God and is therefore of enormous value in the eyes of God…”(Document C). “Now the Christian community, as we have it particularly in the letters of Paul, … says in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, neither male or female, neither slave nor free… . Here is a community that invites you, which makes you an equal with all other members of that community,” (Document D). This was beneficial to a wide range of people, especially peasants because they could have a part in society and be equal to their Christian peers.
In the essay “Judaism and Economic Reform”, Norman Solomon, a Jewish-American journalist, presents a compelling argument on the basis of the need for economic reform while providing simple religious base solutions. While discussing two major economic problems that plague the world’s current economy, Solomon introduces the Jewish view of the global economy and their general view on economics as a whole. With this introduction to the Jewish worldview of economics we as readers are able to transition into understanding Solomon’s solutions of education & using Jewish law to improve the current state of the global economy. Although Solomon’s ideas of education and relying on Jewish law to improve the global economy seem logical, Sallie McFague, a Christian theologian, provides a different yet similar viewpoint of improving the global economy in her essay “New House Rules: Christianity, Economics, and Planetary Living”. Her discussion of ecological and neo-classical economics forces the reader to revert back to Solomon’s essay to analyze his methods of fixing the current global economy.
My second evidence to support this claim is when Elie wiesel said “I had but one thought not to have my number taken down and not to show my left arm” (Collections (310). In this quote he was only thinking about himself in order to survive, so in order to survive he needed to be a little selfish and think about what he needs to do to survive the selection. My last claim to support how survival is selfish when Elie wiesel was running he was using all his strength and power and didn't care about how anybody else was doing in order to survive. He said “I felt as though I had been running for years” (Collections(310). Elie wiesel is using all his strength and power in order for him to survive his not doing it for anybody else.
...s not been addressed. Another useful standpoint to have would be that of someone neither Muslim or Christian. Both religions may have a warped view of the state of affairs due to their conservative and biased views. Someone non-religious could objectively evaluate the points of views that Muslims and Christians each have regarding merchants and commerce.
Selfishness is a disease of the soul that every person experiences several times throughout their life. To say that it has never been experienced would be hypocrisy. To say that it is a “good thing”, would be erroneous. Although as humans we like to lie to ourselves, it is no question that selfishness can make any person act like a fool. It consumes us and makes us into someone we are not. Whether it leads to getting people killed, falling in love, or buying alcohol, selfishness always leads to destruction.
Henry Hazlitt states, “The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups” (Hazlitt, 1979, p. 17). Leviticus 19:35-37 compels, “You shall do no wrong in judgment, in measurement of weight, or capacity. You shall have just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin: I am the Lord your God, who brought you out from the land of Egypt. You shall thus observe all My statutes, and all My ordinances, and do them: I am the Lord.” According to Proverbs 22:7, people will always be slaves to the lender as demonstrated by the Federal Reserve System violating Biblical values in economic
Being selfish can get you somewhere in the moment, but in the end, it will hunt you down. People have always been selfish, and that will continue throughout the ages, but Frankenstein shows just how much being selfish can affect your life as a whole. Let us all remember we can work each and everyday to better ourselves and fix what we can in our lives. If each of us changed one selfish thought a day, think about how far we would be in a
...ne; it is welded into my personality that I need to have some power and authority in order to be content. I would, therefore, resent being regarded as economically equal to others in all situations, because that would mean that regardless of how hard I worked and how successful I became at my job, I would be, in the eyes of the government, equal to all others, even those who worked at the least of their capacities and showed no resolve whatsoever to make something greater of themselves. Therefore, after studying what it means to live in a command economy, I have decided that life spent as a citizen in a centrally planned economy would be predominantly disadvantageous, with the sparse sprinkling of advantages few and distant and clouded from being fully beneficial by the supremacy of a government that exercises control even into the personal lives of each individual.
Bastiat writes, “Each of us has a natural right - from God – to defend his person, his liberty, and his property.” He makes the point that that this individual right can be used collectively; a common force as a substitution of individual forces, to protect persons, liberties, and properties, and therefore cannot conversely be used for the purpose of destroying persons, liberties, and properties. Bastiat, when describing his ideal “simple, easy to accept, economical, limited, non-oppressive, just and enduring government” summarizes his economic principles simply as “the non-intervention of the state in private affairs”. For he believes that “a science of economics must be developed before a science of a science of politics can be logically formulated.” He summarizes that science simply; “if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime…then abolish this law without delay.” The [Catholic] Church, and its followers, share the same ideals. For the Church teaches us that, “the free market is the most efficient instrument for utilizing resources and effectively responding to needs” and that “to safeguard…a free economy…the State must adopt suitable legislation…in such a way that it does not become abusively involved in the various market activities, the carrying out of which is and must
If one is a Christian looking to establish a business in a third world country, instead of just falling into the secular worldview of thinking that it is okay to dump waste into their water because there is no law against it; one might look at from a Christian worldview.
Psychological egoism, a descriptive claim about human nature, states that humans by nature are motivated only by self-interest. To act in one's self-interest is to act mainly for one's own good and loving what is one's own (i.e. ego, body, family, house, belongings in general). It means to give one's own interests higher priority then others'. "It (psychological egoism) claims that we cannot do other than act from self-interest motivation, so that altruism-the theory that we can and should sometimes act in favor of others' interests-is simply invalid because it's impossible" (Pojman 85). According to psychological egoists, any act no matter how altruistic it might seem, is actually motivated by some selfish desire of the agent (i.e., desire for reward, avoidance of guilt, personal happiness).
Fundamentalist Christians believed that God created man in His own image, and that claiming mankind was simply an evolved animal was a direct assault on the Bible (Numbers, 1992). Furthermore, Fundamentalist Christians opposed Social Darwinism, and they established the Social Gospel movement, which attempted to create societal reform and alleviate some of the problems stemming from the Industrial Revolution (Schultz, 2016). This stood in direct contrast with Social Darwinism, as the Social Gospel movement tried to help those who were in need, as well as reduce poverty and prostitution (Schultz, 2016). Additionally, the Fundamentalist Christians opposed eugenics, as they believed that only God should determine who is and who is not fit to
The first type of interaction occurs in markets for resources. What dictates how much money one can spend depends on the resource price, i.e. wages, interest, rent and profit. The second type of interaction occurs in markets for products. Households give money to businesses in exchange for goods and services. In return the households want the finished goods and services which were produced by the firms through product markets. Therefore, money flows from household to firms. In addition to the demand of the product, households provide labor, capital, and natural resources to the
Much of scripture speaks to the issues of money and taking up cause for the poor, who are among the most vulnerable in society. The Old Testament has a key theme of protecting the powerless. The powerless in biblical times were often the most financially vulnerable within society, yet God cares for them. Kyle Fedler explains that God’s favoritism seems to rest with the poor and oppressed, and to reject those members of the community, is to reject the God that so deeply loves them. Within our society we often show our favoritism not to the poor, but to the wealthy. Our society runs off of individualism. That individualism blinds us to the needs of