Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Western civilization's influence
Western civilization's influence
Western civilization's influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Western civilization's influence
The West won the Cold War. Discuss.
The Cold War dominated International Relations for nearly 50 years with the biggest power struggle seen in international politics between the USA and the Soviet Union “as liberalism contended…with an updated Marxism that threatened to lead to the ultimate apocalypse of nuclear war” (Fukuyama, 1989 p.3) With the Cold war dominating international relations for nearly 50 years; the importance of understanding what led to its unpredictable demise remains a relevant topic for debate. The emergence of the USA as the central defining democratic power in the early 20th century aided to its inclusion to the pre-categorized idea of the West that purely consisted of European nations (Bonnett, 2004).Thus categorization
…show more content…
Consequently, the Soviet Union’s economic disadvantage pressured Gorbachev to pursue a policy of negotiation with the US which culminated in the INF treaty in December 1987 compromising of a virtual surrender by the Soviets and marked their exit from the Cold War (Malia, 1994 p.414). SDI highlighted the economic and technical backwardness of the USSR’s central economic system and was therefore a principle factor in triggering negotiations as Gorbachev believed that he could not afford to engage in a new space arms race. SDI heightened Gorbachev’s need for reforming the Soviet Union by presenting his country with a threat they could not match unless the economy was overhauled. The general secretary wanted a reprieve from the expensive and increasingly unstable Cold War so he could focus on revitalizing the USSR’s domestic economy. They were technologically too backward and increase the economic burden on the population anymore could be catastrophic for the regime. Reagans’ stubbornness over SDI at Geneva and Reykjavik brought Gorbachev to the point where he was willing to unilaterally withdraw from the Cold War. In short SDI heightened Gorbachev’s perceived need for reforming the Soviet Union by presenting his country with a threat they could not match unless the economy was overhauled. If he did not the …show more content…
The democratic principles introduced through Gorbachev’s policy of Perestroika paved the way for a pro-capitalist party to gain control of Russia and replace the communist regime with a Western Capitalist model, thus eliminating the biggest ideological threat to the West. Glasnost introduced the liberal ideals of freedom of thought and individual expression to soviet society which placed critics of the communist regime in charge of much of the Soviet mass media. Economic reform began to create serious dislocations in 1988-89 and when leading soviet economists were asked to propose solutions they recommended capitalist solutions of rapid marketization and privatization of the economy (Kotz and Weir, 1997 p.131). A major part of the party-state elite of the soviet system itself began to abandon its allegiance to soviet socialism gravitating toward western style capitalism (Kotz and Weir 1997 p.131). Out of this process there emerged a movement the pro-capitalist coalition, drawing support from the intelligentsia, economists, private business owners and a growing section of the party state elite (Kotz and Weir, 1997 p.131). Boettke (1993, pp.5-6) makes the point that mature Soviet-style socialism did not conform to the textbook model of socialism. Based on this it could be
The alliance formed between the US and USSR during the second world war was not strong enough to overcome the decades of uneasiness which existed between the two ideologically polar opposite countries. With their German enemy defeated, the two emerging nuclear superpowers no longer had any common ground on which to base a political, economical, or any other type of relationship. Tensions ran high as the USSR sought to expand Soviet influence throughout Europe while the US and other Western European nations made their opposition to such actions well known. The Eastern countries already under Soviet rule yearned for their independence, while the Western countries were willing to go to great lengths to limit Soviet expansion. "Containment of 'world revolution' became the watchword of American foreign policy throughout the 1950s a...
The major factor that led to the true end of the Cold War was the ongoing personal and diplomatic relationship between Presidents George H. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. This resulted in the reduction of the Russian military and favorable arms agreements. Key indicators of the substance behind this relationship were the Soviet troop withdrawals from Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, and Hungary (lifting the Hungarian/Austrian “Iron Curtain” along the border). Subsequently the opening of the Berl...
Mau, Vladimir. " The road to 'perestrokia': economics in the USSR and the problem of
With the pressure of the Cold War and the rise of tension between the World War II allies, President Ronald Reagan proposed a new defense system, a new missile that was called the (SDI) Strategic Defense Initiative. This made the Soviets more alert and alarmed. President Ronald Reagan was able to meet with the new leadership of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, to come to an agreement.... ... middle of paper ...
Discussions of the causes of the Cold War are often divisive, creating disparate ideological camps that focus the blame in different directions depending on the academic’s political disposition. One popular argument places the blame largely on the American people, whose emphasis on “strength over compromise” and their deployment of the atomic bomb in the Second World War’s Pacific theatre apparently functioned as two key catalysts to the conflict between US and Soviet powers. This revisionist approach minimizes Stalin’s forceful approach and history of violent leadership throughout World War 2, and focuses instead on President Harry Truman’s apparent insensitivity to “reasonable Soviet security anxieties” in his quest to impose “American interests on the world.” Revisionist historians depict President Truman as a “Cold War monger,” whose unjustified political use of the atomic bomb and ornery diplomatic style forced Russia into the Cold War to oppose the spread of a looming capitalist democratic monopoly. In reality, Truman’s responsibility for the Cold War and the atomic bomb drop should be minimized.
The political ideologies of the USA and of the Soviet Union were of profound significance in the development of the Cold War. Problems between the two power nations arose when America refused to accept the Soviet Union in the international community. The relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union was filled with mutual distrust and hostility. Many historians believe the cold war was “inevitable” between a democratic, capitalist nation and a communist Union. Winston Churchill called the cold war “The balance of terror” (1). Cold war anxieties began to build up with America and the Soviet Union advancing in the arms race for world dominance and supremacy. America feared the spread of Communism
During the late 1940's and the 1950's, the Cold War became increasingly tense. Each side accused the other of wanting to rule the world (Walker 388). Each side believed its political and economic systems were better than the other's. Each strengthened its armed forces. Both sides viewed the Cold War as a dispute between right and wron...
Odd Arne Westad, Director of the Cold War Studies Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, explains how the Cold War “shaped the world we live in today — its politics, economics, and military affairs“ (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). Furthermore, Westad continues, “ the globalization of the Cold War during the last century created foundations” for most of the historic conflicts we see today. The Cold War, asserts Westad, centers on how the Third World policies of the two twentieth-century superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — escalates to antipathy and conflict that in the end helped oust one world power while challenging the other. This supplies a universal understanding on the Cold War (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other over the expansion of their power.
There have been many attempts to explain the origins of the Cold War that developed between the capitalist West and the communist East after the Second World War. Indeed, there is great disagreement in explaining the source for the Cold War; some explanations draw on events pre-1945; some draw only on issues of ideology; others look to economics; security concerns dominate some arguments; personalities are seen as the root cause for some historians. So wide is the range of the historiography of the origins of the Cold War that is has been said "the Cold War has also spawned a war among historians, a controversy over how the Cold War got started, whether or not it was inevitable, and (above all) who bears the main responsibility for starting it" (Hammond 4). There are three main schools of thought in the historiography: the traditional view, known alternatively as the orthodox or liberal view, which finds fault lying mostly with the Russians and deems security concerns to be the root cause of the Cold War; the revisionist view, which argues that it is, in fact, the United States and the West to blame for the Cold War and not the Russians, and cites economic open-door interests for spawning the Cold War; finally, the post-revisionist view which finds fault with both sides in the conflict and points to issues raised both by the traditionalists as well as the revisionists for combining to cause the Cold War. While strong arguments are made by historians writing from the traditionalist school, as well as those writing from the revisionist school, I claim that the viewpoint of the post-revisionists is the most accurate in describing the origins of the Cold War.
Despite this disagreement, Gorbachev and Reagan reached many agreements on issues regarding disarmament and sent a message to the world that the two biggest conflicting powers had ended their near-40 year dispute. Although at the outset of his presidency, Reagan sought to resolve the Cold War primarily through the use of money, it was his mouth that got the job done. The policy of containment had successfully stifled the Soviet empire and provided an opportune time for Reagan to end the war, and Gorbachev's willingness to comply provided him with the means to do so. Ultimately it was their special relationship, the inevitable implosion of the Russian economy, and President Reagan's fearlessness in demanding progress that brought an end to the Cold War.
The significance of the Moscow summit was bolstered by the fact that it went ahead despite the Communist spring offensive (which was partly carried out to disrupt or even force the cancellat... ... middle of paper ... ... y détente left at all by 1979 stalled following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, were suspended. The ‘Carter Doctrine’ which followed showed the U.S. reverting back to a confrontational stance in the Cold War and in effect, with both sides now not showing any commitment to a relaxation in tensions, this was the confirmation of détente’s failure. Bibliography · Cohen, W.I. ed.
The purpose of this investigation is to assess how significant Mikhail Gorbachev’s Glasnost, and Perestroika polices contribute to the collapse of the USSR. In order to understand how significant of a factor Gorbachev policies were to the collapse of the USSR, we will investigate from how significant were the reforms emplaced by Gorbachev, to how the USSR was doing economically from the time Gorbachev came into power. The main sources for this investigation range from an Excerpt from The cold war: The United States and the Soviet union by Ronald Powaski who states facts about both the economic and political issues of the time. Excerpts from “New political thinking” from perestroika by Gorbachev which states how he believes new political ideas are for the good for the USSR. Finally in The Dissolution of the Soviet Union by Myra Immell who goes over many of the factors of the USSR’s collapse.
With the shock of two destructive world wars and then the creation of the United Nations, whose aim is to preserve peace, it is unconceivable for these two nations to fight directly in order to promote their own ideology. But the US and the USSR end up to be in competition in numerous ways, particularly in technological and industrial fields. In the same time they start to spread their influence over their former allies. This phenomenon have led to the creation of a bipolar world, divided in two powerful blocs surrounded by buffer zones, and to the beginning of what we call the Cold War because of the absence of direct conflicts between the two nations.
The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.
The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid a 2Gaddis, John Lewis, The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941-1947, New York, 2000, pp. 113-117. 32-62, 282 - 315. 3Hobsbawm E.J, The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991, New York, 1996, pp. 113-117.