Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on slaughterhouse five
An essay on slaughterhouse five
An essay on slaughterhouse five
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on slaughterhouse five
There should be no reason to ban Slaughterhouse five from high school seniors. The book does include violence, valgur language, comments on homosexualtity, filled with profanity and full of explicit sexual reference, makes references to religious matters but we as adults understand and learned what people went through when they were in war. Slaughterhouse five author Kurt Vonnegut shared experience of the main character in the book Billy Pilgrim who was “unstuck in time”. The author explained the experience of Billy Pilgrim during War in details and depth. The author used the phrase “so it goes” in the book 106 times throughout the novel. The author meant by this phrase that no one in the war can do anything to ignore the situation. In war there is no help. That's the way how Wars was. This phrase also teaches us the students that we should move on in life because time does not wait for anyone. The …show more content…
He comments on racism that it is easier to just ignore racism because everyone is equal. We as a high school seniors know about racism and the author makes it more clearly that we should ignore racism. This novel is a science fiction, also it switches the tone from first person to third or third person to first. On page 23 the author Kurt Vonnegut shift from first person to third person voice and On page 67 the author shifts from third person to first person because it makes the novel more real. This novel is not only about war this book is about how to write and how to make the novel more realistic. This novel is great example for people who wants to write books. This novel is a fine piece of literature and it should not be banned. Please read the book once before making any decisions about banning Slaughterhouse five. Thank you very much for reading this letter and we will wait for your
I enjoyed that the book challenged some of the biggest problems in our legal system, or even society as a whole. There is still a lot of racism going on, and this book was not afraid to exploit that. I enjoy those kinds of readings. They are the things that will eventually spark a change and shed some light on the problems that are happening right now.
The novel the outsiders should be banned because it has violence things that happens in the novel. “But dally, heaters kill people’’,kill em with switchblades to, dontcha?” This quote states that the characters in the book are really dangerous. All this violence should not be told to kids,teens.
...title “Great American Novel” has been the center of a heated debate for many years. While many of the novels that are debated may never be fully accepted as a Great American Novel, I believe that Kurt Vonnegut’s novel, Slaughterhouse-Five, can be an exception. Slaughterhouse-Five tells of the destruction and after-effects of war on an unlikely hero, Billy Pilgrim. Many veterans can relate to Billy Pilgrims experiences both during and after the war which makes the novel relevant to the American people. Billy Pilgrim can also be seen as a hero to veterans because of his ability to overcome his mental state and be able to go back to civilian life and be able to conform to society. Because Slaughterhouse-Five addresses topics that have occurred in the past, are currently occurring, and will occur in the future, the novel should be considered a Great American Novel.
This book teaches the importance of self-expression and independence. If we did not have these necessities, then life would be like those in this novel. Empty, redundant, and fearful of what is going on. The quotes above show how different life can be without our basic freedoms. This novel was very interesting and it shows, no matter how dismal a situation is, there is always a way out if you never give up, even if you have to do it alone.
The most meaningful part of the book for me, was the sit-ins, a form of protest in which demonstrators occupy a place, refusing to leave until their demands are met. The reason the sit-ins were so meaningful is that it really brought attention to how Americans were segregating the African Americas. Just as if you do nothing when a bully, whites, is picking on you, blacks, they will continue picking on you until you fight back. The sit-ins were a nonviolent way to show that they no longer will or have to take the abuse.
Someone breaks something? So it goes. Somebody dies? So it goes. Throughout Kurt Vonnegut’s novel “Slaughterhouse-five”, “so it goes” was stated 106 times expressing the general sense of acquiescence to the way things are. The author made that the catchphrase to show that bad things that occur should be accepted, because there is nothing that can be done to change it, bringing in the idea of fate. Vonnegut made very big examples of using “so it goes” with people that went through these types of events, the Tralfamadorians that the main character Billy Pilgrim encountered, and the story from the Gideon bible that was alluded to in the novel.
...ves to be on the banned books list because of its level of violence. One that wants this book off the banned books list could say that violence is everywhere, why should one book be banned for showing something that is everywhere in todays society. I think this book shows a good concept of war. It could open ones mind to the idea of war and how one is forced to fight for themself and even their country. In the book they fight for themself and their district but relating it to the readers life he or she can think of it as fighting for themselves and their country. Which I believe is a good concept for young teenagers to be exposed to. I think this book should be off the banned books list because there are many reasons The Hunger Games can be considered a “good” book, it portrays many good themes throughout the novel and it can be translated into modern day war.
The Catcher in the Rye Should Not be Banned. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Since its publication in 1951, The Catcher In the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger has served as a conflagration for debate and extreme controversy. Although the novel has been the target of scornful criticism, it has also been the topic of wide discussion. The novel portrays the life of sixteen year old, Holden Caufield. Currently in psychiatric care, Holden recalls what happened to him last Christmas.
"Slaughterhouse-Five Book Notes Summary by Kurt Vonnegut: Major Characters Book Notes Summary." BookRags.com: Book Summaries, Study Guides. Bookrags Inc., 2000. Web. 06 Jan. 2010. .
“Slaughterhouse-Five” is an anti-war novel. It describes a flesh-and-blood world. Main character is Billy Pilgrim, he is a time traveler in this book, his first name Billy is from the greatest novelist in the USA in 19 century’s novel “Billy Budd” ; and his last name is from “The Pilgrim’s Progress” by John Bunyan. Differently, the main character in “The Pilgrim’s Progress” ’s traveling has meaning and discovering, Billy Pilgrim’s traveling just has violence and escape. In the novel “Slaughterhouse-Five” by Kurt Vonnegut ’s main character, Billy Pilgrim is sane and his time travel is half in his mind half is real. He is looked so innocent and weakness, there is a sentence which is spoken by Billy Pilgrim “So it goes.” (2) This quotation shows that a poignant sense of helplessness.
In conclusion, Slaughterhouse-Five is an anti-war novel because Vonnegut, the character, says it is in the first chapter, the terrible damage it left on Billy, and how it exposes war's horrifying practices. Knowing these elements, one might wonder why people still have wars. Although these anti-war novels cannot completely stop wars, they are important. The role that such novels play is one of raising awareness of war's actions and wrongdoings. Since the role of the novels is important, authors should continue to write them to keep people informed and educated about a problem of such a huge magnitude.
The novel is opened with a chapter about the making of novel, with scattered thoughts from Vonnegut. The novel is closed with a chapter written mainly from the perspective of the author. Vonnegut uses this time to blatantly state his own opinions about different matters in the novel and to provide commentary. He emphasizes through these chapters, in his own subtle way, the importance a belief in free will has in stopping war and in being human. He says at the beginning of the book that he believes what many believe: that stopping a war is like stopping a glacier. However, despite this, he uses his free will to do everything in his power to stop war. In a conversation with his friend’s wife in the first chapter, he states
...is story, Hemingway brings the readers back the war and see what it caused to human as well as shows that how the war can change a man's life forever. We think that just people who have been exposed to the war can deeply understand the unfortunates, tolls, and devastates of the war. He also shared and deeply sympathized sorrows of who took part in the war; the soldiers because they were not only put aside the combat, the war also keeps them away from community; people hated them as known they are officers and often shouted " down with officers" as they passing. We have found any blue and mournful tone in this story but we feel something bitter, a bitter sarcasm. As the war passing, the soldiers would not themselves any more, they became another ones; hunting hawks, emotionless. They lost everything that a normal man can have in the life. the war rob all they have.
Jones, Peter G. "The End of the Road: Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children's Crusade" Modern Critical Interpretations Slaughterhouse-Five Ed. Harold Bloom.
The novel critiques concepts of history by challenging traditional conventions. Rushdie uses unreliable events to subvert official notions of history. For example, in his description of the Amrister Massacre he describes the troops that fire on the crowd as being white, when they were not. He does this perhaps to illustrate how much history is based on interpretation and ideology. It also illustrates how fact (written down as history), fails to take into account different notions of space and time. For example, in the pas...