Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is government necessary
Why government is necessary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is government necessary
WHY WE NEED A GOVERNMENT 115W
We need a government because it keeps a country in order. In Canada, a government is necessary to avoid conflict and division between the people. It would keep the country organized while making sure that each citizen’s voice is heard through representatives in a governing body. In addition, a government is necessary to maintain unity and peace within Canada. Without a government, it would be more likely for individuals with ill intentions to take action. It may also make the country a “target”, because the lack of government might make Canada vulnerable to potential international threats. Furthermore, it would make the country weaker, because there would be lack of unity and order among the citizens.
WHY PEOPLE
…show more content…
SHOULD VOTE IN AN ELECTION? 125W People should vote in an election to fulfill the duties of a responsible citizen.
In Canada, voting is a right. Citizens have the right to vote for whoever they want without restrictions or intimidation from an outside party. However, voting is a responsibility as well. It is important for people to participate in voting, because whoever gets elected holds the decisions for Canada. People elected in the government lead the country. In order for Canada to thrive, Canadian citizens need to participate in voting. People need to be involved, because Canada’s situation is held in their own hands during elections. They have to elect the leader who they deem to be the best for the country, someone who’d lead and guide its people to success.
WHAT THE PRIME MINISTER’S JOB REQUIRES 231W
The Prime Minister is the head of the Canadian government, and the job itself holds many roles and responsibilities. An aspiring prime minister should understand what it takes to be a leader, and incorporate ideal characteristics for a good and effective governance.
The prime minister acts as a cabinet chair and decides on the size of cabinet and its ministers, - usually members of parliament and sometimes a senator - and assigns their department responsibilities and portfolios. A prime minister needs to consider the representation of different people in the cabinet in order for every citizen’s voice to be heard. For fair and effective delegation, the prime minister should select cabinet members that
…show more content…
would represent the French and the English, women and ethnic minorities appropriately. Furthermore, a prime minister should possess ideal characteristics of a leader. For example, being able to communicate effectively is necessary. A prime minister needs to communicate well with the members of his government. He also needs to reach out to the people, in order to create an understanding between him and citizens of the country. It is also ideal for a prime minister to be charismatic, honest and committed. The job of a prime minister may be rigorous, and it is not something anyone could just take on. Therefore, an aspiring leader should be able to commit to the job and persevere during times of difficulty and crisis. THREE ISSUES THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD TACKLE ISSUE #1 CANADA’S IMMIGRATION POLICY 143W Canada's letting in a number of refugees from Syria and other countries. However, with terrorist attacks and threats around the world, such as the ones in Paris and Brussels, many Canadians feel that the immigration policy should be stricter. It is important for the government to tackle this issue, especially since immigration is more likely to increase because of the refugee crisis that’s currently going on, where civilians’ lives are threatened by the conflict currently taking place in Syria.
I feel that it’s important to tighten security and review the immigration policy, so that possible terrorist attacks would be minimized. However, this should not hinder the chances of immigrants to successfully seek refuge in Canada. A stricter policy should not promote racism or discrimination against refugees and other people of color, but instead it should ensure their safety, and the public’s as
well. ISSUE #2 GUN CONTROL 136W With constant shootings happening in the United States, some Canadians feel that it's time to renew gun-control in Canada as well. Ron Davis, a Canadian citizen from Riverview, New Brunswick, whose daughter had been shot during a robbery, spoke up about gun control in the country. “I have nothing against hunting rifles, that’s fine,” Davis, 74, said in an interview. “It’s the weapons that are available and legal that have nothing to do with hunting that concerns me most. We’re just asking for another disaster to happen.” Gun control in Canada is another important issue that the government needs to discuss. Thorough background checks would be great to reduce danger in communities and ensure that citizens are safer. In addition, it’s important to check valid licenses of gun owners or purchasers to avoid illegal gun carriers. ISSUE #3 GLOBAL - MISSIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA 87W The government, mainly the Conservatives, are asking citizens to support deepening Canada’s involvement in the war in Iraq, and to expand that involvement into a combat mission in Syria. Discussions regarding Canada’s involvement is crucial, because the decision that the government would come to may influence the current situation in Syria. In my opinion, combat missions may be the least beneficial to Canada’s interests and its forces. Instead, the country should provide more help through a well-funded and well-planned humanitarian aid effort, as proposed by the Liberals.
...n of their cabinet, while others may choose to create a new political path without consulting the views of their party. Mellon thinks that the Canadian government is under dictatorial scrutiny, whereas Barker contradicts this belief. The idea of a prime-ministerial government is certainly an over exaggeration of the current state of Canada. There are too many outside and inside forces that can control the powers the Prime Minister of Canada. Furthermore, there are several outside sources that indicate a good government in Canada. The United Nations annually places Canada at the top, or near the top of the list of the world’s best countries in which to live. These outcomes are not consistent with the idea of a one ruler power. Canada is not ruled by one person’s ideas, suggestions, and decisions, but by government approved and provincially manipulated decisions.
If I were the prime minister of Canada, I would strive to accomplish and strengthen three major things. First, I would make sure that our educational system maintains strong and will make others succeed in life, second, I would make sure that everyone has equal and fair treatment in our society, and lastly, I would make sure every Canadian family can live happily by reducing tax.
Canada is a society built on the promise of democracy; democracy being defined as “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.” In order to operate at full potential, the people of Canada must voice their opinions and participate fully in the political system. This is why it’s shocking to see that people are becoming less engaged in politics and the voter turnout has steadily been declining over the last 20 years. This lack of participation by Canadians is creating a government that is influenced by fewer people, which is detrimental to the democratic system Canada is built on.
The electoral system in Canada has been utilized for over a century, and although it has various strengths which have helped preserve the current system, it also has glaringly obvious weaknesses. In recent years, citizens and experts alike have questioned whether Canada’s current electoral system, known as First Past the Post (FPTP) or plurality, is the most effective system. Although FPTP is a relatively simple and easy to understand electoral system, it has been criticized for not representing the popular vote and favouring regions which are supportive of a particular party. FPTP does have many strengths such as simplicity and easy formation of majority governments, however, its biggest drawback is that it does not proportionally represent
One may be surprised to learn that the turnout rate of individuals voting in Canada's federal elections has never reached 80% (Elections Canada). In fact, it has been decreasing since the middle of the twentieth century, as shown by an increase in voter apathy. An electoral system is designed to provide those who live in democratic governments with the opportunity to vote – in an election – for the candidate whose platform coincides with their political beliefs. This can be achieved through a direct democracy, where citizens are directly involved in the decision-making process, or through an indirect democracy, where citizens elect a delegate to act on their behalf. In a direct democracy, all citizens would be present during governmental meetings and have the opportunity to give verbal input. As one may expect, this would be extremely difficult to coordinate with Canada's population of 34.88 billion (Statistics Canada). Canada uses an indirect democracy, which allows for two basic forms of electoral systems in which representatives are elected. In the simple plurality electoral system, the candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is elected, regardless of a majority or not. It is commonly known as the “first-past-the-post” system, which alludes to a horse race; the winner passes the post with the highest number of votes, and only need to garner more votes than their opponents. The successful candidate wins all the seats in their riding or constituency while the candidates who places second or third will receive no seats, regardless of how many votes they lose by. Proportional representation is the second form of electoral system used in Canada; the percentage of the votes received by a party is proportionate to the numb...
Should Canadians turn to compulsory voting for answers? Many democracies throughout the globe, including Australia, Belgium, Greece, and Luxembourg, employ mandatory voting and report an average turnout rate of 90 percent ("Canadian Parliamentary Review - Article"). In light of this, establishing electoral participation as a civic duty seems pretty reasonable. Particularly considering the guaranteed increase in voter participation, it seems like the perfect solution. When examined father in-depth, however, one will discover the issue poses some
The young as well as the older people of Canada seem to be in a deadlock. The question of if the federal government should or should not lower the voting age is a question debated surely around the dinner tables of families in Canada, as well as in the ranks of the government. Some people even suggest that the age needs to be raised. What would make people want the voting age to be lowered to an even lower age than the young adult age of 18? On the other hand how can the youth of Canada who have their own individual views be able to make a difference without being able to vote? Both sides provide for an intriguing look into the facts and resolutions for an appropriate way to either change the voting age or keep it the same. Throughout this paper I will look at and analyze the arguments of the youth who claim to be 'disenfranchised', as well as others who see the lowering of the voting age to be detrimental rather than an improvement to the Government of Canada's political process. In 1854, before Canada became a responsible government the only people allowed to vote were people who had a high value of land which they owned, and had a high income. Women and people with other ethnic backgrounds and religious beliefs were also denied the right to vote. This did not mean that these people did not have their views and beliefs on who and what they wanted in their government but rather they were denied the right. These laws have changed since then drastically and Canada has become a democratic country (rule by the people). However, the frustration of not being able to vote and support their ideals and politicians does live on in the hearts and minds of thousands of young Canadians under the age of eighteen. The...
The right to vote for non-citizens has become an increasingly controversial topic due to the strong and often divisive opinions of permanent Canadian residents. The capacity to vote is one of the most important and valued freedoms granted to individuals. Although the acceptance of non-citizen resident voting is frequently encouraged in order to propel self-governing justice and immigrant inclusion, opponents claim that it is in a nation’s best interest to delay voting rights to non-citizens. According to this claim, by preserving voting rights to citizens, non-citizens would have the social responsibility to actively learn the essential community services and self-ruled obligations necessary to earn their citizenship. In spite of this claim, non-citizens should be allowed to vote because the right to vote offers immigrants a more welcomed chance to contribute in the decision-making processes that take place in Canadian legislature. Seeing that this legislature administrates the rights and freedoms of the immigrant populations, it would only be just if immigrants had the right to elect candidates who spoke on behalf of their best interests.
Trying to apply new reforms to the Canadian constitution has been no easy task. The mixture of the parliamentary/monarchy powers denies the citizens’ direct participation in the government’s decision-making process and does not allow the existence of a complete, free democratic system. A true democracy simply cannot fully exist with a restricted monarch selecting type of government and any reforms must be applied to make Canadian constitutions’ laws based on democratic principles. The deficiency of the Canadian electoral system decreases the level of democracy in the Canadian constitution. Canadian citizens are known for being active in political matters whether it relates to them specifically or not.
This essay has argued that there are many limitations that the Prime Minister is subjected too. The three most important are federalism in Canadian society, the role of the Governor General, and the charter of rights and freedoms. I used two different views of federalism and illustrated how both of them put boundaries on the Prime Minister’s power. Next I explain the powers of the governor general, and explained the ability to dissolve parliament in greater detail. Last I analyzed how the charter of rights of freedoms has limited the Prime Minister’s power with respect to policy-making, interests groups and the courts. The Prime Minister does not have absolute power in Canadian society, there are many infringements on the power that they have to respect.
Nakhaie, M. R. (2006). Electoral participation in municipal, provincial and federal elections in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 363-390.
To avoid the corruption of this role, the Governor General powers should be limited to that which aids the fulfillment of their duty to ensure that Canada has a Prime Minister. Even though their power is theoretical and rarely exercised, the Governor General holds to much power for an unelected member of parliament:
Every year, over 250,000 people make Canada their new home. Attracted by its education system, economy and universal healthcare system, there are few other places in the world like it. All Canadians are guaranteed equality before the law and equality of opportunity, regardless of where they are from. However, some might argue that Canadian policy has not been put into practice as well as it should be. Is the concept of true equality a far-fetched idea? It seems that Canada has taken great measures to promote the integration of immigrants socially, but can the same be said for their integration economically? Politically? To judge whether or not Canada has been successful at promoting the integration of immigrants in these realms, a deeper understanding of Canadian policy must be considered.
In Canada, the cabinet is made up of the prime minister and members of the parliament, chosen by the prime minister. The members of the cabinet are all responsible for leading the nation and deciding on important decisions that will impact the country. With Justin Trudeau introducing his cabinet that is made up of 50% women and 50% men it will be the first time Canada has had an equal gender-balanced cabinet. Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau’s, decision to plan a gender-balanced cabinet is a decision that will ultimately improve Canada’s perspective on women’s rights and help the country gain true equality;additionally, his decision will allow many people to see what a diverse country Canada is, as Justin Trudeau has also stated that on the day
Canada has a central government designed to deal with the country as a whole. Things like national defense, banking, currency, and commerce are controlled by the central government. All other matters are left to the provinces to deal with. Such as education, hospitals, and civil rights are responsibilities of the states. The Canadian Parliament consists of two houses. Their Senate is made up of 104 members who serve until the age of seventy-five.