Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of natural disaster
The effects of natural disaster
Natural disasters and their effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of natural disaster
5 Reasons Why People Share Fake Photos During Natural Disasters There are many reasons why people would share fake pictures especially during these tragic events. Natural disasters like hurricanes, tornados, tsunamis, or anything are horrifying. People go through a lot with the destruction that these disasters make. So why would people want to deal with more distractions? There are three reasons why people would want to cause these types of distractions towards people; 1) They just want attention to make it seem as if they are “cool”. 2) People could just want to stress out others in the community, and think something bad is going to occur. And lastly, 3) disrupt the news, and what they already need to let citizens know about what is happening in everyday life. The first reason people would post these types of immature, and unneeded things is because they just want attention for themselves. As it states in paragraph 4, “They want to be a part of the conversation,” millions of people received, and looked at false information. The pictures, and videos posted by careless people not knowing that what they are sharing, is false information that spreads bad news about a completely different topic. These types of irrelevant things disrupt the media and drags …show more content…
When people post this dumb content, it can make everyone wonder if anything that is coming their way will harm them. To them, this is completely unfair especially to the people who work every day to protect themselves and their families. These days, it seems like any topic someone creates, either real or false, everyone believes it. They believe it because the source was on the “internet” , and everything on the internet is “true.” In society this is disrespectful to the people who are constantly looking after everyone, and our safety especially during a natural
People use mass media for many different reasons, such as enjoyment, companionship, surveillance, and interpretation. In order for a person to interpret what mass media puts out, media literacy is applied. Media literacy allows the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and communicate messages in a variety of forms while focusing on being able to interpret media messages and its effects in many different ways. This is done through audiences whom actively receive and process the medias messages. In Adrian Chen’s article, “Unfollow” the effects media technology has on people is brought to light through the story of a previous Westboro Baptist Church member, Megan Phelps-Roper, who became acclimated with Twitter. The unfiltered and controversial
This is the essay for any person with open-minded views who has been begging to write for the sake of their sanity, on the subject. This is due to the fact that incivility in the media is always present. These, are described in the book, In Your Face Politics, by Diana Mutz. She explains the problems put forth with having views yelled, ranted, and crammed into the face of the public. She, postulates the idea, that these overt opinions cause confrontation, with people that have opposing viewpoints.
...ause it could give children wrong stereotypical information, which could lead to development of a wrong idea about their culture and society later in their adulthood. These effects could be reduced by making strict laws that prevents hateful articles from publication, or at least a law that requires editors of blogs and magazine to carefully approve only accurate and appropriate information for the general public.
Seemingly inoffensive posts can easily become the center for a huge uproar in a matter of minutes. Jon Ronson explores this topic in his article “How One Stupid Tweet Ruined Justine Sacco’s Life.” His paper is yet another example of the hypersensitivity of the nation. What was meant to be a simple joke sparked a huge protest for white privilege over social media. His article lists several other examples of such posts that sparked similar disputes, all over seemingly innocent comments. Both Ronson and Friedersdorf illustrate the downward trend on acceptance and forgiveness in America today.
Vasterman, P., Yzermans, C. J., & Dirkzwager, A. J. (2005). The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiologic reviews, 27(1), 107-114.
If this becomes as serious of a problem as it has the potential to become, then our lives will fundamentally change. Not only will the landscape of public health policy change, but the idea of safety and security in our health and lives will be forever warped. We must work together to solve this problem—and if not for ourselves, then for those people that I spend my nights dreaming about.
ComEd appears to have thoroughly analyzed social media best practices before it embarked on its own social media program. However, it decided to place the responsibility for social media within its own customer operations rather than in its communications or marketing department. Was this is a good decision- why or why not?
is very dangerous to their health. As well, they have no idea that it is also threatening to the
threatened and when this happens local news and internet makes it look as if police are the
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
safe would you feel knowing that natural disasters such as this may not only increase in
In extreme situations, journalists choose the angle they can find, tick the boxes to the news worthiness, but never having a stand. According to Kempf, journalists fulfill certain criteria of newsworthiness and fake empirical evidence, which implements propaganda and in the journalists’ defense “that it did not matter the pictures were faked since they only showed what people already ‘knew’ and since they served the goal of opening the eyes of the public” (Kempf 2002, p. 60). Various examples from the War on Terror, where journalists and reporters would fake evidence just to gain more audiences but examples like this could elevate the issues, and it is as if this responsibility of Journalism of Attachment only adds fuel to the fire and this is done in the name of peace (Kempf 2002).
Social media has become both popular and crucial in crisis and emergency communications. Responders are not only communicating to their public through social media outlets, the public is communicating with each other, and with responders. Individuals are able to provide important information on disaster impacts, including location and imagery, using nothing more than a smartphone equipped with a camera and GPS locator. One particular technology from Ushahidi offers an interesting way for responders and affected individuals to communicate with one another in the course of a disaster response. The Ushahidi BRCK offers an application of technology that, while not originally designed for use in the emergency management field, has an application in the response to a disaster. This and other technologies contribute to the ever changing way responders and individuals communicate.
Educating the public and getting them to take preparatory actions to better protect themselves in the face of natural hazards has led to extensive study of risk communication by social scientists and disaster researchers over the past half-century (Quarantelli, 1991). Lindell et al (2006) describe the reason for risk communication as “to initiate and direct protective action” relative to a hazardous threat (Lindell et al, 2006, p. 84). Better understanding of why people take protective actions has led to better risk communication directed at preparedness measures. Research has identified key ingredients regarding the effectiveness of risk communication messages as well as conditions conducive to adoption of improved preparedness practices.
The increase in unpredictable natural disaster events for a decade has led to the need for disaster preparedness as a central issue in disaster management. Disaster preparedness reduces the risk of loss of lives and injuries and increases a capacity for coping when a hazard occurs. Considering the value of the preparatory behavior, governments, local, national and international institutions and non-government organizations made some efforts in promoting disaster preparedness. However, although a number of resources have been expended in an effort to promote behavioural preparedness, a common finding in research on natural disasters is that people fail to take preparation for such disaster events (Paton, 2005; Shaw 2004; Spittal, et al, 2005; Tierney, 1993; Kenny, 2009; Kapucu, 2008; Coppola and Maloney, 2009). For example, the fact that nearly 91% of Americans live at a moderate to high risk of natural disasters, only 16% are prepared for a natural disaster (Ripley, 2006).