Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise and fall of jim crow laws
Martin Luther King and Unjust Law
Racial relations from Reconstruction to the Jim Crow era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise and fall of jim crow laws
Colin Wright
February 19, 2016
Blue Humanities
Opposition of U.S. Law to Divine Law Divine law, as expressed by definition.org, can be defined as, “Any law (or rule) that in the opinion of believers, comes directly from the will of God (or a god).” Divine law is not man-made, and therefore cannot be put forth as an opportunity to perceive at will. Man-made law, on the other hand, is just the opposite. As it has been depicted through the United States’ history in dealing with racial controversy, man-made law has been construed and misinterpreted all for the sake of an excuse; it has been distorted in an attempt to protect the wants – not necessities – of whites and their social rank. Martin Luther King, Jr., in the “Letter from Birmingham Jail,”
…show more content…
law to that of divine law is this: divine law is considered just, as it comes from the word of God. U.S. law is unjust because it is out of harmony with the moral law (God’s law). (King, 3-4). To paraphrase King, unjust laws create a dual class of “I” and “it”, where the white man seems to look down on the black man as an object, or property. Unjust laws include not allowing a minority to vote and then enacting laws of which inflict harm on that minority. Unjust laws are any laws that are made to prevent a minority from taking part in an action without the intent for the white man to follow that same law. (King, 4). All of these examples from King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” provide a structure by which King outlines the opposition of U.S. law and divine law. In short, all divine laws are just, but the same cannot be said for the man-made U.S. law, as it has let harsh racism and acts of cruelty toward minority groups of all kinds slip through the cracks of the legal system rather than being acted upon …show more content…
(King, 3). Wells-Barnett also gave an excruciatingly detailed account of just how brutally blacks were treated by whites in “On Lynchings”. She recites the hanging, beating, stabbing, burning, and dragging of the body of Lee Walker, a black man who did nothing outside of asking two women for food. The aftermath? Walker was accused of rape and sentenced, not by authorities, but by a civilian mob, to death by nothing less than torture. What do both of these portrayals have in common? Both are accounts of whites showing severe and often fatal brutality toward black people, obviously breaking the law of the United States, and yet getting off of the hook. Racism ran (and still runs today, although not in a dominative fashion, but rather aversively) through the entire nation, including civilians, police, even church
Martin Luther King guilts the clergymen for the first time when he brings up their moral wrongness. King says that he has a “moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (4). He summarizes why laws are just or unjust by stating, “A just law is a man-made code that
are both set in a terrible time when the black community were slaves and treated like garbage. The only difference is one was successful and the other not so much.
In reading the first few paragraphs in the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King Jr shows commitment to all African Americans. He says, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. In the one sentence King declared that he would fight racial...
In the touching, influential letter, Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. responds to the white, Alabama clergymen who condemned his movement as “unwise and untimely” (1) and delineates his motives for traveling to Birmingham, where whites consider him an “outsider” (1). Hoping to express his ambition of nonviolent protest in a sympathetic, deferential manner, he implores the white clergy to join the struggle for Civil Rights. Throughout the letter, he addresses and disputes against each negative argument by the whites, testifying his position unpretentiously, yet confidently. With aptitude, poise, and humility, King establishes his motives for coming to such an unwelcoming environment. In his heart-rending letter, King’s coherent logos, stimulating rhetorical questions, and accentuating parallel structure express to the white moderates who criticized his actions that nonviolent, direct protest is not only essential, but also inevitable to contain agitated hostility and to assume relative peace.
The forceful subjugation of a people has been a common stain in history; Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail was written during the cusp of the civil rights movement in the US on finding a good life above oppressive racism. Birmingham “is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known,” and King’s overall goal is to find equality for all people under this brutality (King). King states “I cannot sit idly. and not be concerned about what happens,” when people object to his means to garner attention and focus on his cause; justifying his search for the good life with “a law that is just on its face and unjust in its application,” (King).
Mr. King explains the hypocrisy that the clergymen are partaking in by referring to church ideology. Most of the common people are Christians and by their common teachings, it specifically states the principles that they abide by in their creed. However, the unjust laws that the majority are forming against the minority goes against their biblical practices of the Christian faith. Mr. King impudently states:
Dr. Martin Luther King addressed many topics in, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. He answered all the issues that were aimed towards him in a very skillful and well thought out manner. These issues came from, “A Call For Unity”, which was a letter published by eight local clergymen expressing their feelings about what Dr. King was doing. One concern in particular that King did an outstanding job of confronting was that of the clergymen’s anxiety about him breaking the law. King addresses the question of, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” by clarifying that there are just and unjust laws. He also goes on to explain the difference between the two, the effect of unjust laws on the people that they are aimed towards, as
King's main thesis in writing the Birmingham letter is that, racial segregation, or injustice to the black American society, is due to the continuous encouragement of the white American society, particularly the powerful communities in politics and religions. King defends his primary thesis all throughout the length of his letter, and the arguments that he has made to prove that his thesis is true and valid will be the focus of this rhetorical analysis.
A statement from eight white clergymen from Alabama prompted Martin Luther King’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail”. This statement criticized Kings actions of non-violent protests against racial segregation and the injustice of unequal civil rights in America (Carpenter elt al.). The eight clergymen considered Birmingham to be “their” town and King was disrupting the “Law and Order and Common Sense” established in coping with racial issues in Alabama during this time (Carpenter elt al. par 1). These clergymen considered King an “outsider” and describe his actions as “unwise and untimely” (Carpenter elt al. par 3). This statement suggests that there is an appropriate time to create equality among all Americans. To analyze the power strategizes of Martin Luther King’s Letter we must understand this letter was written from a jail cell, where King a black man, was held for protesting for racial equality. Furthermore, King began writing his letter among the margins of the newspaper’s article that contained the clergymen’s statement (King Institute).
Few things have impacted the United States throughout its history like the fight for racial equality. It has caused divisions between the American people, and many name it as the root of the Civil War. This issue also sparked the Civil Rights Movement, leading to advancements towards true equality among all Americans. When speaking of racial inequality and America’s struggle against it, people forget some of the key turning points in it’s history. Some of the more obvious ones are the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves in the North, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s march on Washington D.C. in 1963. However, people fail to recount a prominent legal matter that paved the way for further strides towards equality.
Despite this, King’s views are not compatible with the cultural relativist approach to ethics. The ethical approach by cultural relativism indicates that every culture has different moral standards and leads to the perception that there is no ultimate standard for good or evil. This approach to ethics is based on how each individual society conducts themselves, and in turn each society creates ideas of good and evil. With this in mind, King’s ideas of how society should be do not line up with this definition of cultural relativism. Based off of his feelings towards the treatment of African Americans, it can be determined that he believes that there is a general standard for good and evil while also thinking that the societal standards of cultural moral standards shouldn’t differ from every other culture. Kings feelings towards African American treatment can be seen through his discussion of the white moderate of page 296, where he states “Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding of ill will.” By stating this, King is showing a distaste for the white people who believe there are no problems with the law or society, mainly due to the fact that they aren 't facing adversity or paying attention to what protesters are saying, by which Kings beliefs then go against cultural relativism. Therefore, by King going against societal
Racial inequality is once again on the forefront of Americans ' minds, and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement has become a topic of contentious debate. However, this tension is by no means a new phenomenon, this is the same anger that inspired civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr to rally against the status quo and fight for racial equality. The essay "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by King addresses the same issues of racial inequality, prejudice, and police violence that has given rise to the Black Lives Matter movement. In the 1960 's, the Jim Crow laws that mandated segregation and prevented black Americans from voting were brutally, and blatantly racist policies. Additionally, the penalties for breaking these laws
The injustice of segregation laws is leading to a violent impact throughout the African American community, as they strive to have equal rights. In the essay, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. describes many struggles the African American community is going through. Dr. King effectively uses rhetorical appeals to persuade the clergymen that segregation laws are unjust and must end.
Additionally, it is important to understand Luther’s distinction between the Law and the Gospel in order to further explore Luther’s understanding of human freedom. The Law is God’s commands; it allows humans to coexist, limits chaos and condemns sinfulness, though it is not God’s road...
Unfortunately for Christians, there is actually very little law in the Bible -- either Old Testament or New -- that is original. Consider the Torah of the ancient Jews. The laws of the Babylonians, Assyrians, Sumerians, Hammurapi, Eshnunna, Hittites, Mishnah, and Israelites all bear a striking resemblance to each other, due to widespread copying of laws. Shared social norms produced identical laws against sorcery, kidnapping, sale of an abducted person, false witness, business dishonesty, bribing judges, property right violations, shutting off irrigation canals used by others, etc. The complete list of identical laws and customs is quite extensive. & nbsp; Nor is the New Testament's approach to the law unique.