Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good versus evil struggle
Evil versus goodness
Good versus evil struggle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Grendel is first introduced to readers in the story of Beowulf which was created in 1000 A.D. It isn't until the 1970’s that Grendel is brought up again by author John Gardner. Gardner’s version of Grendel in a very different style compared to the epic poem Beowulf . Unlike the poem of Beowulf, in which Grendel is displayed as an evil monster, Gardner has a different intention when writing his story. Gardner’s true intention is to display Grendel as a human. Also, by conveying Grendel as a human, it proves his overall message; mankind is the one who is truly evil.
One technique that Gardner uses to display Grendel as a man is by writing from Grendel’s perspective. According to John Gardner's Grendel and the Interpretation of Modern Fables,
…show more content…
by Robert Merrill, “Gardner chose to retell the story of Beowulf because he wanted to champion Grendel's "modern" point of view” (Merrill 4). Throughout the story, the word “I” is used, which indicates that Grendel is talking about himself. For example, Grendel describes his encounter with a ram in which he says, “I stamp. I hammer the ground with my fist. I hurl a skull-size stone at him” (Gardner 5). Doing this gives Grendel a voice, which a monster would normally not have since creatures are thought less of by humans. As stated by Marie Nelson in her article, John Gardner's Grendel: A Story Retold and Transformed in the Process, “Grendel, having received the gift of language, which can perhaps in itself be considered evidence of Gardner's "humanizing" intention, uses his gift in ways that reflect not just the alliteration of Beowulf, but Gardner's concern with the effective use of rhythmic patterns as well” (Nelson 7). Similarly, Linda Tarte Holley, added to her piece, John Gardner’s Notes From Underground, that Gardner, “Like Grendel, knows the power of language gives shape to such ideas” like, human are the true monsters (Holley 6). Also, by writing the story from Grendel’s point of view, it shows the reader that Grendel has a side to him that is more childlike than adult. Merrill even says that, “There is a childlike pleasure in Grendel's spinning” and that by being separated from his mother caused him to whine and cry like a child. When Grendel is stuck in the tree, he shrieked, “Mama! Waa! Waaa!” (Gardner 18). Physically, he’s a man, yet he has the mentality of a child. Because of his childlike mentality, he does not realize that his actions of eating people are wrong which can possible demonstrate that he is not evil. To be considered evil, a person or thing, must know and realize that whatever they are doing is wrong and can cause harm to someone or something else.
In Grendel’s case, he does not know that his actions of eating people are wrong due to his childlike mentality. So can he really be considered evil? If Grendel is really a “monster” does it really matter whether he is evil or not, considering the fact that monsters are usually always considered evil since they are not like humans? For example, when he is approached by the men on the horses while he is stuck in the tree, they think he is an evil spirit because of what he looks and sounds like. They ask, “Could it be some type of oak tree spirit. Better not to mess with it… That’s it! King’s right! It’s a spirit!” (Gardner 25). As a result of this, the readers are forced to assume that Grendel is evil just because he looks and acts like he …show more content…
evil. Another technique that Gardner uses to convey Grendel as a human is by adding human characteristics to Grendel. One characteristic Gardner uses is making him the protagonist. By doing this, it allows the readers to get to know Grendel. Also, it helps the reader realize what he is going through since the story is told from his point of view. According to John Gardner’s Notes From Underground, by Linda Tarte Holley, “He becomes increasingly human because he fears, respects, reveres the power of language to give shape to past, present, and future” (Holley 8). Marie Nelson also agrees with this and wrote in her article, “I can readily acknowledge that Grendel's life story, as Gardner enables him to tell it, embodies varied aspects of human experience” (Nelson 3). Also, in Grendel’s story, the reader feels sympathy for Grendel due to the fact that he is lonely and his space is being invaded by men or humans. The reader is able to see that Grendel feels jealous and resentful towards mankind and God himself, since he does not receive the love, affection, and attention like humans do based upon the fact that he is a monster and God created him as the descendant of Cain. If this is the case, could it be argued that Grendel, in a way, is a man and is similar to Jesus? Just like the readers, Grendel “learned from the Shaper's songs that he is a descendant of Cain” as stated by Nelson in her article (Nelson 11).
With this being said, all men, like Grendel, are created by God as a descendant of someone else who has passed, whether they were good or evil. Could Grendel be the doppelganger of Jesus? Jesus, like Grendel, had no father figure in his life Jesus also sacrifices his life for the better of mankind and to ask for forgiveness for the sins that they committed. Similarly, Grendel sacrifices his life to show that men are truly the evil ones. As stated by Holley, “Grendel is heroic, rises above the human, sings for us” that humans are truly the evil ones. Unfortunately, just like Jesus, Grendel’s message is still not realized by
men. Gardner depicts Grendel as a hero to demonstrate how man is truly human. During the 1970’s the Vietnam War was occurring, During this war, men from the United States were traveling across the ocean to fight the communist that were located in North Korea. Similarly, Beowulf traveled across an ocean to defeat and kill Grendel. According to the Beowulf story, “...The ocean swayed, Winter went wild in the waves, but you vied For seven nights; and then he outswam you, Came ashore the stronger contender…” (515-518). During the Vietnam war, in between 219,000 and 313,000 men lost their lives to other men. These men brutally killed each other due to their differences, just like all the men that Grendel ate and as stated by Holley, Beowulf is as much beast as Grendel is human” since he killed any monster that he came across. Yet, Beowulf and those soldiers who fought and won Vietnam are crowned heroes while Grendel and the people of North Korea are referred to as the enemy. How could that be? How is it that Beowulf and the American soldiers who killed other “men” just like the Koreans and Grendel, be “heroes”? According to society, anyone who kills another person in the act of protecting themselves and the ones closest to them is a hero. Therefore, wouldn’t everyone be considered a hero since Beowulf defeated Grendel, the Americans won the war, the Koreans fought a strong battle and risked their lives for the ones they love and their country and Grendel sacrificed his life to show that men are the evils ones. This is another reason why Gardner wrote the story of Grendel; to show that depending on how you view the story and the situations surrounding it, it can change your perception on the true message and thoughts on Grendel and Beowulf as characters or even men. Like Nelson wrote in her piece and Gardner demonstrated in his story, “The true hero, as we suspected all along, is Grendel himself”, although in the story of Beowulf, Beowulf is the true hero. Gardner wrote the story of Grendel to help readers understand the true message of the story. He did not write it to cause arguments or to bash Beowulf. He did not write it for fun or to add his own imagination to it. He wrote to show a bigger picture. A bigger message. He wrote it to show readers that, “ he is primarily interested in the creature's human side” (Nelson 5).
For ages, humanity has always told stories of the classic struggle between man and monster. The battle between Beowulf and Grendel is a prime example of this archetype, but is Grendel only purely a monster? In his article “Gardner’s Grendel and Beowulf: Humanizing the Monster”, Jay Ruud makes a point that Grendel is a hybridization of both monster and man, particularly in John Gardner’s novel Grendel. In the poem Beowulf, Grendel is depicted as a purely evil monster who terrorizes Hrothgar and his people, but the novel provides a more humanistic backstory to the fiend. Throughout the novel, Grendel tells of his internal struggle between his thoughts of filling the role of the monster versus attempting to make amends with the humans. This conflict
Good vs. Evil in John Gardner's Grendel? & nbsp; John Gardner's novel Grendel gives the reader a new perspective on the classic "good vs. Evil" plot. From the start of the book the reader can tell that there is something very unique about the narrator. It is evident that the narrator is a very observant being that can express himself in a very poetic manner. The story is one the reader has most likely seen before, the battle between the glorious thanes and the "evil" beast. In this case, however, the "beast" is the eyes and ears of the. reader. This, of course, forces the reader to analyze situations in the book in the same way that Grendel does. By using this viewpoint, author allows his readers to see the other side of the coin. Therefore, Throughout the course of the novel the reader is able to understand how important to Grendel in defining the human. & nbsp; Grendel's first encounter with the human beings that he literally defines is not a pleasant one. After accidentally trapping himself in a tree he is discovered by a group of thanes out on patrol. Grendel expresses absolutely no hostile intentions towards these "ridiculous" (ch. 2). pp.24) creatures that "moved by clicks." (ch.2, pp.24) The thanes do not understand what Grendel is and are very uneasy about the whole situation.
He doesn’t believe that he has done anything wrong, therefore he doesn’t believe that he is a bad person. In the novel Grendel, Grendel states that, “I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly—as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back. I create the whole universe blink by blink… (Gardner, 22)”. This internal thought from Grendel at the beginning of his story shows his belief that he holds the power to choose his future and that he creates his own reality. He truly does believe that despite his killing nature and that he is not technically human, he can still live among them and rise above his original reputation. In his encounter with the dragon in chapter 5, Grendel is told that, "My knowledge of the future does not cause the future. It merely sees it” (Gardner 63). What the dragon says in this instance sticks with Grendel in the sense that even though he is drawing away from his existentialist views, he still knows that he controls himself. Him accepting this strikes as somewhat half existentialism and half nihilism due to the character arc taking place. In addition to the evidence of existentialism in the novel itself, there is also many instances within literary criticism that suggest Grendel’s
John Gardener’s Grendel is another version of the epic Beowulf, except in a differing perspective. This story is retold from the viewpoint of Grendel. Gardener wants us to empathize with Grendel through his own thoughts and emotions. The way one sees the monster in Beowulf is completely different than how one would think of him in Grendel. One is forced to view someone else’s opinion versus getting to form an opinion for oneself.
A being cursed for evil goes through life looking for meaning. How can a monster of biblically banished descent be challenged with ideas of morality. In John Gardner’s postmodern novel Grendel, Grendel, explores and speculates on the meaning of life, humanity, and existence while being cursed to life as a monster. Due to his own bleak existence and the observations he has made of mean, Grendel views life as meaningless. Even though he is a descendent of Cain, the distinction between good and evil is blurred in Grendel’s perspective. How can a monster view morality when he is the wicked one yet he watches humans kill each other for bloodshed? Grendel is trying to make sense of an absurd world while the different theories shape his own identity.
On the other hand, it is obvious that "evil" Grendel could not survive without the "good" humans.
No one knows who wrote Beowulf but we do know who wrote Grendel. John Gardner took the epic Beowulf and added more to the brilliant story. Grendel takes on the same story as Beowulf but from the perspective of Grendel, the beast in Beowulf. The story of Grendel is very interesting because from reading Beowulf it is completely uninspected. In Beowulf Grendel is said to be a disgusting monster that’s only job is to kill. In Grendel we really see him as very nice but turns to be evil because he is pushed into that direction.
As a result of not receiving help when the bull was attacking him, Grendel develops a new theory: “I alone exist. All the rest, I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly—as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back. I create the universe, blink by blink” (Gardner 21-22). Grendel’s questioning of his way of living marks a transformation of Grendel into a mature character who gains knowledge from his experience with the bull, concluding that the world revolves only around him. The utilization of ‘I’ portrays that his growing isolation from the absence of his mother during the bull attack is what permits him to believe that he is superior to everyone else and the only worthy creature to exist. This foreshadows his ultimate purpose in life which is to kill mankind. Grendel, as the creator of the world, holds the ultimate power to decide who will live, lacking the perspective that there is a higher force other than himself. In other words, the experience Grendel acquires from the bull attack enables him to mature and obtain insight on the truth of his
... by murdering Grendel, this action is expressed as moral. This idea is reconfirmed when the Dragon explains to Grendel how he is “the brute existent by which they learn to define themselves” in reference to men (Gardner 73). This further suggests that society requires evil to present them an explanation for their life and actions.
In Chapter 8, Grendel exclaims, “I’m a machine. Like all of you. Blood-lust and rage are my character,” (Gardner 123). This profound statement establishes a connection between Grendel and the ambiguous “you,” the reader. The monster, though he confesses to his wrongdoing, asserts that readers are no better than he. Countless bible verses reiterate this concept: “For all have sinned,” (Romans 3:23) “[Humans] are all. .impure with sin,” (Isaiah 64:6). Gardner’s reminder to readers of mankind’s predisposition to sin earns pity for the monster. He expands on these sympathies by describing the nature of Grendel’s lonely existence. “But there was one thing worse,” Grendel states after discovering the dragon’s charm, “no weapon could cut me,” (Gardner 75). In this moment, nihilism overcomes Grendel; if fighting poses no danger, it has no purpose, and neither does he. Any reader who has had an experience which challenged his or her values cannot help but feel empathetic towards the purposeless creature. Perhaps more piteous, however, is the suggestion that Grendel has no choice in being “the dark side. . the terrible race God cursed,” (Gardner 51). The dragon condemns Grendel as “the brute existent by which [humans] learn to define themselves,” telling him that it is worthless to better his character (Gardner 72). It is not until after
John Gardner’s Grendel portrays a monster searching for his purpose in life. The characters know the meaning of their lives, but Grendel tries to discover his role and what life has to offer him. Grendel discovers his identity through other characters’ actions and beliefs. In Grendel, John Gardner illustrates the contrasting views of each character to show their view of society and the influence they have on Grendel.
Grendel is born a neutral being, perhaps even good, but nevertheless, without hate. The transition which he undergoes to become evil is due to misunderstandings between himself and humans and also meeting with a dragon who is questionably evil. As a young “monster”, Grendel knew nothing other than the cave he lived in and his mother who could not speak any distinguishable language. He was a playful creature who seemed to be like a “bla...
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.
...cannot be called a monster. The translator of the version of Beowulf that was read was not very accurate because it failed to show that Grendel’s mother was a ‘Lady.’ Also, as stated before, translated versions of original texts are always recreated, which means that Grendel’s mother could actually be a queen-like figure instead of being depicted as a monster. Lastly, the intentions of Grendel’s mother were not used to harm anyone but because of her maternal role. She was in a situation similar to Hildeburh’s. Also, she did what she felt was right as a mother, just like Welthow did. The only reason Grendel’s mother can be identified as a monster is because she has a relation with the monstrous Cain, which she cannot be blamed for. All in all, Grendel’s mother had every right as a mother kill a Dane, which is not monstrous. Therefore, she cannot be called a monster.
Through Grendel's own hatred and anger, he brings his own downfall. The "sin-stained demon" has his roots in the vile creature Cain. Since Grendel is spawned from Cain, he can never feel the love of God or of people: ". . . God, / Whose love Grendel could not know." (84-85). It is because of this, that Grendel hates every mortal being he lays his eyes upon. Hatred leads to anger, constant anger, ". . . bearing God's hatred, / Grendel came, hoping to kill" (393-394). Fear is Grendel's other major flaw, "His mind was flooded with fear . . ." (435). Through his hatred and fear, Grendel seals his own fate.