Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
'Making The Memorial': Analysis of Maya Lin's approach
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many factors that should be considered when memorializing an event or person including, what the monument is portraying, and any historical significance behind the area it is being built in. Factors that should also be taken into consideration are the impact these monuments will have on the communities they are being built in. Lastly, when creating a monument the design is an important factor. The design needs to educate audiences on the subject of the monument, compliment the land surrounding it, and portray the individuals in an appropriate sense. What a monument is portraying is an important factor, the message that a monument displays is one of the reasons it may “stand” or get neglected and moved from one museum to another until it finds it’s way into a dumpster. Amongst the most important parts in the construction of monuments or …show more content…
As Lin stated in “Making The Memorial” A monuments’ design should “work with the land.” In order to make the monument stick out and give its true meaning you need to link the monument and its surroundings together. The design of a monument impacts the way people feel about it and the way it's perceived. Therefore, the design is a crucial aspect to the monument. The best way she thought to demonstrate this and elicit an emotional reaction was to place all the veterans' names. This gesture was so simple and subtle yet dramatic by the way it was demonstrated. When crafting a design for a memorial you want it to be dramatic but not too grandiose, it should be done tastefully and respectfully. Most importantly, it should strike people because you want it to commemorate these people and these events. Therefore, design is an important factor when creating a monument because it is the way you’re telling a story and you want to be able to tell the story in a powerful and sincere way, which is exactly what Maya Lin achieved. (Lin
Monuments and museums are arenas of public history and for the formation and articulation of identities and narratives.[1] Decisions taken as to the formation of museums and the selection, display and organisation of exhibits are influenced by criteria which are not necessarily politically neutral; these may especially involve devices of political elites to emphasise aspects of communal togetherness and thus exert control over communities.[2] Memory and commemoration of past events and generations is by its nature a political and contested act, especially in sharply divided societies.[3] It is no surprise that recently established governments and states should particularly concern themselves with the production of such forms of festivities, commemorations, and monuments.[4] As rulers of a sharply divided society, unionist elites in Northern Ireland in the aftermath of its eventful creation in 1920-1 had particular reasons to concern themselves, and did concern themselves, with such strategies of power.[5] The integration of the province's Catholic minority may have been, or may have been felt to be, beyond the rulers of Northern Ireland;[6] but this very fact heightened the importance of preserving the highest possible degree of political unity under unionist hegemony among the Protestant majority.[7]
Lin's work, unlike most previous military monuments, rejects the emphasis on heroics in favor of a poignant, contemplative, apolitical design which conveys an almost unbearable sense of loss. Simple, graceful, and abstract, the design specified two 246.75 foot long walls of polished black southern India granite, set below grade and connected at a 125 degree angle.2 Each segment of the wall is composed of 70 panels. At their intersection, the walls are 10.1 feet high and they taper down to a height of 8 inches at their extremities.3 The largest panels have 137 lines of names.4 The smallest panels have just one line. Each line consists of five names, which were sandblasted into the polished surface by hand, rather than cut into it with machine tools.5 Currently, the monument wall lists the names of 58,175 members of the armed forces who were confirmed killed or listed as missing in action during the Vietnam War.6
America’s history-both good and bad-has much to teach us. Taking down, destroying these monuments is erasing, rewriting the physical symbols of the nation. This type of cultural whitewashing is inglorious. We can treat these monuments as a cautionary tool to remind ourselves what we are and what we are not. The cost forebears paid for the freedom of the nation should be remembered; therefore, people should retain these statues to remind of themselves what these monuments represent.
History has a strange way of coming back around when it comes to human civilization. It has been said repeatedly that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. However, just because there is a potential for danger in the future, this does not mean that humanity must ignore what once was. History is normally remembered through what is known as a memorial. When a memorial is put into a physical representation, it is then known as a monument.The need to memorialize events or people is complex; in some cases, monuments honor moments of great achievement, while in other cases, monuments pay homage to deep sacrifice. A monument's size, location, and materials are all considerations in planning and creating a memorial to the past. Examples of such feats are the Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, and even Mount Rushmore. For the latter of the
A memorable monument is a historical structure that represents a significant person or event. They are designed to show the importance of either the person or event. Monuments are intended to last forever so the subject will never be forgotten to society. The factors that should be considered when creating a memorable monument are that the subject must be powerful and meaningful to society and the design should resemble the significance of the subject. These factors help communicate the magnitude of the individual or group’s sacrifice, as well as honor moments of great achievement in history.
After the horrors of the Vietnam War a national monument honoring the brave soldiers was asked to be developed. In 1981, Maya Lin, an undergraduate at Yale University entered her design in the nationwide competition that was sponsored by the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund. From more than 1,400 submissions Maya Lin’s design was picked (Vietnam Veterans Memorial). The memorial was a black granite V-shaped sunken wall, which was composed of seventy-four panels that increased its height from eight inches to more than ten feet. On the wall the names are listed in chronological order according to the date of death or the day a soldier went missing during each day, these names are alphabetized (Roberts 909). Maya Lin’s main goal was to describe a journey which “would make you experience death and where you’d have to be an observer, where you could never fully be with the dead.” (Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial). Lin’s purpose of the memorial was not to forget about the war, but in fact it was to remember the truth of what happened and be able to look back and see the horrors that occurred during the Vietnam War. Unfortunately, Maya Lin’s design of the memorial caused a lot of
I saw that soldier’s faces were lit eerily in the dim light. The sculptures apparel seemed fitting due to the light rain that was falling at the memorial site. I noticed the wall glimmering as the raindrops slid down the glassy surface and fall into the wilting flowers while the images illuminated from the glare of rain and light. I felt this morbid and realistic presence of the soldiers and for a mere second felt the gloom and menace of the war they were in. I walked around the site to gather more information on what the memorial was dedicated to. I walked past the mural wall and as I did I paid particular attention to the various images of people and equipment on the wall. All of the facial expressions of the people on the wall gave the memorial a very real presence to it. I continued walking down the granite walk and I read it was the Korean War Veterans Memorial and immediately got the message the artists were trying to convey. It was very clear that they were showing the public that freedom is not free. The memorial symbolizes the soldiers that have fought for the freedom of others and it recognizes the importance of these actions and
Americans have often used art to symbolize the relationship between themselves and their history. Therefore, art is used to honor and remember someone or an event where people died, through a memorial. As an example, The National World War II Memorial is a memorial to honor and remember the people who served in World War II. The success or failure of a memorial depends on how well it represents the image that people have of a certain person or event. Especially in America because they find the construction of a national monument so controversial that no memorial has been erected in the National Mall without a discussion. The National World War II Memorial on the National Mall was a poor addition; its location diminishes the formerly open space between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, its design is vague, and it is a poor choice even when compared with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. A very good start.
The buildings that I chose to do were an advert for a powerful civilization. The emperors showed their power that they are the great leaders with a lot of money that could get many workers as they possibly could to erect their pattern of monument. The emperor Augustus used propaganda to ensure a vast base of support leading up to his renunciation in 27BC. The Roman emperors also built all these monuments in regard to public entertainment for their political advertising.
In the article of “Exhibiting Intention: Some Preconditions of the Visual Display of Culturally Purposeful Objects”, the author, Michael Baxandall mainly discussed interrelationship within the group of three agents upon their influence and reflect of the artifacts in the museum, and the understanding of culture elements behind the display. In the first part of this paper, I will identify the points of view of the author. In the second part, I will analyze the layout of the gallery, “Imagining the Underground” in Earth Matters in Fowler Museum in UCLA. Several discussion related to the settings of the museum and the article will be discussed interactively. In general, this paper tries to show the robustness and the weakness of Baxandall’s model, which will specified.
RuthAnne Shellabarger, Comm. 320 Green Jan. 26, 2016 JFK Memorial and Symbolism When deciding on what paper to write, this option of analyzing symbols in memorials really caught my attention I personally have always been intrigued by the history and life of John F. Kennedy so of course I chose to analyze the symbolism behind his memorial. I believe I got this passion of learning about JFK’s life directly from my father; he has always been interested in the story of John F. Kennedy and was in fact born the day the beloved president was assassinated. The John Fitzgerald Kennedy Memorial is a monument in honor of the late U.S. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in the West End Historic District of downtown Dallas, Texas created in 1970 by noted architect Philip Johnson. Kennedy’s requested that the memorial be something simple and Johnson created just that.
Washington, DC is a spectacular place. This being my first time in DC, I was in awe of everything and all the historical places I encountered. The presence of the monuments and history is what made the capitol so magnificent. Having only read about the Lincoln memorial, I never had the chance to experience the sensation of being inside such an honorable place of importance. The imposing white marble walls of the memorial and the many people surrounding it could be seen from afar. Arriving at the location, an unknown feeling came over me. I was experiencing history in a whole different level. When I think about a memorial, the term remembrance comes to mind. Seeing the statue of Abraham Lincoln brought pieces of memories from history class and evoked thoughts of what it might have felt like to be in his shoes. I was astonished by the statue’s enormousness and how grand Abraham Lincoln looked in his chair. The size of the statue compared to pictures from books and elsewhere was surreal. Abraham Lincoln was a very “powerful and prominent individual” in the history of our nation, the statue’s design and size reflected upon that. Looking around me, I wanted to know what the others thoughts were on seeing his statue and how they felt in that building. I finally had the courage to ask one or two people what they thought; they all had the same appreciation as me. Hearing about an important person or learning about them in a history book gives you vast knowledge but it doesn’t evoke the feeling of utter appreciation as the memorial does. When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, many people wanted to build a memorial in honor of him. They wanted to be able to show how important he was to shaping our nation and to “honor his existence”. Ce...
Creating a monument or memorial by no means is a simple task. To create a monument is to create some sort of representation for the person or event and that can not be taken lightly. It is incredibly important for every single detail to be carefully analyzed and perfected because an incorrect representation can tell a completely different story about the person or event. When memorializing an event or person by creating a monument, a group or agency should consider factors such as the location of the monument, its portrayal, what controversies it may create, and its symbolism.
People from all around the world have seen or at least heard of public monuments. Public monuments do an amazing job at displaying history and also showing us how important some places/things are. After reading through the articles we were given there were a few that stood out to me. Those were: Source B “Waiting for Crazy Horse”, Source D “ Preserving Memory: National Holocaust Memorial Museum Controversy”, and Source E “Obscure Monument to Lobsterdom: Washington, DC”. Public monuments should be built because of how they commemorate people and places.
Monuments are a symbol of a significant time in history. Monuments represent life, death, success, and struggle just to name a few. They have become as important to society as the events they represent. They bring history alive to new generations and memories to those who experience them firsthand. Monuments create a bridge between generations. Many parents feel a certain indescribable joyfulness when they see the look in their child’s eyes they had went they viewed the same monument.