Little or no people know about hacking. People don’t know about what can be hacked and can’t. Our daily use tools such as computers, laptops, tablets, digital machines, and phones are hackable. With a single attack hack, bad hackers can search our information through the digital tools we use. For us, there is nothing we can do. But we can be protect by some people who have certain skills. Those people are call hackers or people prefer calling good hackers who are hired by government or private sectors and have less, same, or more knowledges about hacking like bad hackers. In the article “The U.S. Army is teaching kids how to hack at DEF CON,” Selena Larson successfully claims one of the solution to prevent cyber-hack attacks is to raise youngster …show more content…
According to Selena Larson in the news article “The U.S. Army is teaching kids how to hack at DEF CON,” the main idea is to educate kids about hacking and raise them as future good hackers to secure our cyber system. Larson says, “It’s is expected that there will be a job shortage of 2 million cybersecurity professional by 2022.” Youngsters are important source for the future to fill up the jobs for the future cybersecurity. Kids are learning the way of hacking from the hack experts. They might grow up as good hackers who are able to hack the government webs to help find the weakness of the system. Government needs more hackers to protect the cyber system. Larson also reports, “One thing everyone can agree on is that teaching kids to hack is one of the most important things the security community can do.” Since there are many bad hackers out there; government need to recruit many good hackers to protect from hack attacks. The event such as DEF CON is very important in raising future good hackers because the kids learn to differentiate between good hacking and bad hacking (Roose). Security will fail if there are not enough hackers to defend against the cyber hackers’ …show more content…
In an article “A Solution to Hackers? Add More Hackers,” Roose mentions, “He said that hackers could be enormously valuable, if they were properly enlisted in the fight against attacks.” Roose explains many hackers are prevented from working, practicing, or researching their hacking because of the Computer Fraud Laws and Abuse Act. Some talented hackers with little bad backgrounds, which include violated the copyright, cannot get the jobs at the government agency. He states many big companies already discovered the benefits of the hackers because these spend less money for hiring the expert hackers to protect their webs, accounts and exchange system than paying for the lost after the online hacker’s attacks. In the article, Roose tells, “We should take the advantage of their willingness to help secure our national infrastructure.” He also claims many hackers want to protect the national security system because their security, credits, and life depend on it. Lately, the government gives hackers the opportunity to legally hack government websites to check the weaknesses of the websites such as Pentagon. The result from the legally hack event show there are as many as 138 ways bad hackers can attack the Pentagon website(Roose). The main idea is to let the hackers be active in their work with little restrictions by the government laws. For example, the government
The use of hacking to identify weaknesses in computer security has become an increasingly controversial issue in recent years. Awareness of this issue is important, because our ever increasing reliance on technology means that breaches in computer security have the potential to have wide-ranging and devastating consequences to society, worldwide. This essay will begin by clearly defining the term ‘hacking’ and will examine the type of people who hack and for what reasons. There will then follow a discussion of the moral argument on hacking before examining a few brief examples. The essay will then conclude by arguing against the use of hacking as a means of identifying weaknesses in computer security.
Although an act of cyberterrorism has yet to occur, officials and scholars continuously study the possibilities of such an attack. As our physical and virtual worlds continue to intertwine the risk of such an event rapidly increases. Everything from our transportation systems to pharmaceutical manufacturing are computer controlled. The closest the world has come to an act of cyberterrorism was in 2000. Known as the Maroochy Shire case in Queensland, Australia was committed by Vitek Boden. Boden was an engineer for Pacific Paradise, a sewage pumping in Australia. He was able to successful hack into a control system modifying the operations and dumping millions of litres of raw sewage into the local waterways. Boden’s motivation was the only reason the act was not classified as cyberterrorism was his motivation. It was personal rather than political or religious in nature (Sharp Parker, 2009). The only reason this wasn’t the first act of cyberterrorism was motivation. As companies invest in upgrading their technological capabilities, they too need to invest in security structure to protect their systems and the public from threats of terrorism. Our government must also decide how to address public safety in regards to cyberterrorism. On September 11th, 2001 America was reminded how vulnerable we are when it comes to acts of terrorism. The sheer complexity and varying design of attacks often makes it very difficult to create a catch-all defense in fighting terrorism. To improve the disruption of terrorist activities by government agencies in the United States many laws needed to be updated to include the latest areas of electronic communications.
The Ted Talk presented by Catherine Bracy took the word hacking to another level. A new way of looking at a hacker. A hacker meaning much more than a teen behind a computer trying to steal information. The points she brought out is that reaching out to the people can get things done and strengthen relationships between people and an organization and through that relationship both parties are more stable and content. Bracy expressed her experiences with hackers in a government and citizen view, but this can also be applied to personal and
In reality, most hackers are ordinary people with a great deal of curiosity, above-average skills with a computer, a good understanding of human nature, and plenty of time to kill. Hackers have no distinguishing characteristics. Your next-door neighbor could be a hacker, as could your niece or nephew, one of your co-workers, or even the kid who serves you coffee in the morning. Not all hackers are dangerous and out to destroy business or damage lives. The view of the general public toward hackers is mixed. A recent CNN-poll shows 33% of respondents labeling hackers as "useful," 17% seeing them "as a menace," and the majority (45%) seeing hackers as "both" useful and a menace (CNN, 1999).
Computer crime has been an issue since the beginning of computers. Wherever there is something good, there is always someone who takes advantage of it. This can be seen in cyber crime, which has been on the rise in recent years. According to the Los Angeles Times, the median cost of computer crime to a company per year has risen from $3.8 million dollars in 2010 to $5.9 million. (Rodriguez, 2011) This suggests that computer crime is becoming an even bigger hazard to companies. A recent example of this was the data breach committed against Target in 2013.
despair because of our smart phones, TV’s and computers. Any of these devices can be hacked
In recent years, many possible plans to enact government regulation to improve cybersecurity have been suggested. Most recently, in 2017, then U.S. president Barack Obama implemented the Cybersecurity National Action Plan (CNAP). The plan would have invested $19 billion in cybersecurity by gathering experts to make recommendations in regards to cyber security, help secure the government IT group, and encourage more advanced security measures (Daniel 1). However, while CNAP does present a way to solve the problem, it just adds another program that attempts to enhance cybersecurity: “It is the multiplicity of programs and division of responsibility that diminishes their effectiveness. At least eleven federal agencies bear significant responsibility for cybersecurity” (Cohen 1). Every so often, another cybersecurity program will be established, but former plans are seldom removed. This leads to a large amount of departments to share responsibility, which creates general confusion and limits each department’s power. Furthermore, widespread government regulation may weaken cybersecurity. Many fear that any regulation would not be flexible enough and would instead allow easier hacking (Ridge 3). If every system in the entire nation had the same security measures, it would be much easier to break into as by breaking into one system, a hacker a could break into everything.
Hacking is strongly unjustified by individuals due to it being illegal activity. Laws relating to computer hacking vary depending on every region. However, there is a predominance of hacking being illegal in a majority of countries. Broadly speaking, it is illegal to hack into computer systems and networks since it involves accessing information with authorisation. This is a form of invasion of privacy and data breach, automatically making the activity unlawful. From ‘Computer Crime: American Hacking, federal police’, it is stated that computer intrusion, unauthorised modification and destruction of data comes with penalties under the state law. These range from class B misdemeanour (a fine) to class B felony (five years in prison). This validates that in most cases, due to the trespassing of computers and networks and data rupture, hacking is strongly considered as unvirtuous due to it being illegal
In doing so, resilience in learning instructions and technology methods must be taught to learners, and an intervention program had to be designed in this organization to facilitate interest as the cybersecurity field continued to grow. The belief was that academia needed to apply new ways of thinking, new understanding, and new strategies to our nation's response to cyber-attacks according to (Kessler, 2012). Reason being, cybersecurity is about process rather than technology, is not a monolithic area of study, it is a complex topic. Therefore, the answer to cyber-related security challenges in the past was not exclusively about technical resolutions but should have involved a myriad of associated subjects such as science (political and social), national defense strategies, economics, engineering, mathematics, and diplomacy to name a few.
The term “hacker” has been in use since the early 1980’s due to mass media usage to describe computer criminals. The use of this term is vastly used by the general population and most are not aware that there are different meanings to the word. People within the computing community especially within the programming subculture emphasize the use of the term “crackers” for computer security intruders (cyber criminals). Early hackers rarely used their skills for financial gain as a motivation for their criminal behavior in that time cybercrime was infantile and largely seen as a practical joke or game by those who committed it. Bob Thomas created the first credited computer worm n...
The issue with tackling the ethical hacker scenario is that the event is almost entirely action based. There is no end to give meaning to the action and there is no finalized result or indication that it impacted happiness, which many ethical theories depend on. Namely consequentialism, utilitarianism and ethical egotism require an end result in one form or another. There is also no purpose in committing the hackings which makes applying moral theories that deal with motivation and intent, ethical egotism and aspects of virtue ethics, increasingly more difficult to do effectively. Therefore moral theories that apply almost exclusively to the action itself will be utilized in this argument.
The Art of exploring various security breaches is termed as Hacking.Computer Hackers have been around for so many years. Since the Internet became widely used in the World, We have started to hear more and more about hacking. Only a few Hackers, such as Kevin Mitnick, are well known.In a world of Black and White, it’s easy to describe the typical Hacker. A general outline of a typical Hacker is an Antisocial, Pimple-faced Teenage boy. But the Digital world has many types of Hackers.Hackers are human like the rest of us and are, therefore, unique individuals, so an exact profile is hard to outline.The best broad description of Hackers is that all Hackers aren’t equal. Each Hacker has Motives, Methods and Skills. But some general characteristics can help you understand them. Not all Hackers are Antisocial, PimplefacedTeenagers. Regardless, Hackers are curious about Knowing new things, Brave to take steps and they areoften very Sharp Minded..
The main reason hackers hack because they have ability to hack. The casual hobby for some hackers is hacking. They test their own system just to test and see what they can hack and what they cannot hack. The guys who get kicked out of corporate and government IT and security organizations are mostly the hackers. By attacking and stealing information, they try to bring down the status of the organization. The addiction for hackers is the knowledge they gain after the malicious hacking and the ego comes along with that knowledge.
The knowledge of an ethical hacker is much comparable to one of the real hacker. Inorder to hack a system in an ethical way, it is known that some of the black hats have been converted to white hats and now they are using their knowledge for security. It is controversial to hire ex-hackers as an ethical hacker. After all, ethical hacker must be a trustworthy person which will see sensitive information. The work of an ethical hacker is to discover the customer’s weak point by accessing the sensitive and confidential customer information. Even though hackers, which may know the craft and have connections to the underground for getting the newest tools and exploits will be not employed by many companies. As the uncertainty and risk is too high formers hackers will not be employed for doing ethical hacking. As it is stated that, an ethical hacker is a person on whom you can trust. There should be 100% certainty that the information found by the ethical hacker won’t be abused. Patience is another very important ability. Professional hackers are very patient and persistent. To find a piece of information which could help them for hacking a system, they will just listen to network traffic or scan through newsgroups for days. As most contractors don’t want to pay for such an extensive listening phase, most hackers won’t do it. Therefore the important thing for an ethical hacker is to keep up
demolish and immoral witless has plagued the underground too long, let’s bring back the old school ways of formation and system penetrating for the education that it is holding, not for the unethical of that knowledge nor the owner of it.” 3 www.hackers.com. A fix that is adventitious applied to a hacker, is that they are geeks, doffs and dolt. They have few or no friends and spend the plurality of their time in front of their computers.in fact a hacker cold be a CEO of a international, or the person sitting next to you on the subway. Distinctly there are some things all hackers have in ordinary. All able to do higher calculations in math, are well informed in computer languages, and have a good embrace of their native language. They must have a state of the art computer that they know inside and out. They also have approach to, or knowledge of secret codes and computer