Peoples actions should be held accountable in life or death situations. Do you think people should or shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Many situations can determine if you should or shouldn't be held accountable. Everything revolves around choice, so I believe if you have the choice to be in a better situation, you should be held accountable. If you know or do put yourself through a situation knowing it's dangerous, it's your fault if something happens. You should have to pay the price. Many individuals have different opinions, but this is what I regard as true. Have you ever been in a situation where a person should be punished for something they did wrong? Drunk drivers choose to put themselves behind the wheel. This has …show more content…
We need to treat these two groups differently.” Your decision should cost you what you deserve. Dangerous situations happen every day and many would agree you should be held accountable for your actions. Another topic shows the choice of people spending money on drugs and becoming financially ruined. “Drug and alcohol addiction is by far the most costly for the poor. A pack of cigarettes can consume 10% of your family’s monthly income” (Forbes). Addiction in a life-or-death situation is a decision made by a person. if you have control over making that bad choice, you should have to bear the cost. Moral Logic of Survivors Guilt states, “Blameworthiness, here, depends on the idea that a person could have done something other than he did. And so he is held accountable, by himself or others.” Most choices a human makes are all in your power, but some people get put in stressful situations. Although most situations come by choice, some may catch you by surprise. Some people are put in threatening situations that cost them everything. According to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, “roughly one and three people develop PTSD due to abuse/a weapon threat.” In a situation like
In my opinion, people should take the blame for our own mistakes. Our parents raised us but we make our own choices. Our parents may have raised us but it’s our responsibility to make the right choice. As we come into adulthood, we must learn to take responsibility for our actions and accept the consequences that follow. We must deal with our consequences and avoid putting the blame on others. In the book, The Other Wes Moore, Inmate Wes’s mother tried several different things to keep him away from drugs and drug dealing. She worked and moved her residence several times in order to keep him out of the drug path. Unfortunately, he always found his way toward drug involvement.
Even though I believe that we are responsible for our actions and the resultant rewards or punishment, there is a need to “treat” the offender looking at other domains
In this essay I will be discussing my opinion of who is to blame for
The survivor takes the responsibility for the death of their loved one is caused by survivor's guilt. “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami is a short story about a boy losing his best friend during a storm and he goes through a tragic time. The text states “ I stayed away from my home town for over forty years.”(Murakami pg.141) This shows that he had to stay away for many years to get over his guilt. This proves survivors should not feel survivor's guilt.
It is enough accountability as it is, and any other form is simply even more mentally painful to the survivor. Another instance where this accountability appears is in “The Seventh” by Haruki Murakami. This story portrays the seventh man's life after witnessing the death of his very close friend. His friend’s death sticks with him throughout most of his life, and he constantly feels guilt as if he could have done something to prevent it. “That is probably why I never married.
Scapegoating is a better way to experience success. Margaret Atwood speaks the truth when she states “When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody to blame.” In “Half- Hanged Mary” by ……. they used Mary as a scapegoat by blaming everything on her which lead to her hanging. Therefore I defend Margaret Atwood that a world under stress will eventually lead to people being demolished so they can feel better about themselves.
When someone finds themself in a life-or-death situation, their judgement becomes clouded. People can make a decision that they may regret in the long run, but it has saved their life. Most of the time, these people do things that they don’t know enough about- leading to clouded judgement in life-or-death situations. They do not inform themselves as much as they should, and they decide to do something that would put them in threat of danger. People take risks every day, they know what these risks are- but they still choose to go through with their actions. People in life-or-death situations should be held accountable for their actions because they have control over putting themselves in these types of situations that have any risk.
For a new substance abuse counselor it can be difficult to recognize an ethical dilemma. Not that substance abuse counselor’s are ignorant, but most counselors are oblivious to the fact that everything an individual does, has an ethical dimension. Discovering if the dimension is ethical or unethical is a dilemma the substance abuse counselor may have. To help counselors make a decision when faced with an ethical or legal situation, and determine if there is an ethical dilemma the counselor should follow the guidelines that have been put into place for ethical decision-making. For a counselor to recognizes there is an ethical dilemma they should first take the current situation and consider all ethical and legal issues involved and be sensitive to the ethical dilemma at hand. A counselor is not born with sensitivity therefore; it takes time for the mind to develop ethical sensitivity. If a counselor is unable to develop ethical sensitivity, they run the risk of coming to an unethical conclusion in as much, risking their client’s welfare.
This case is a very difficult one because it’s not just involving you but it is involving the people you love dearest. You are basically being given only two choices and that is to save your family or to watch them die. This essay will discuss the different take utilitarian’s have on the decision and the outlook deontologists have
others' lives. This is a tough case no matter how you look at it. The
The film Requiem for a Dream conveys to its viewers the destruction to an individual’s life if they fall victim to addiction. Sara was placed in a mental hospital, Harry lost his arm, Marion partook in explicit sexual endeavors, ripping her of her morals, and Tyrone was arrested and jailed, where he experienced critical withdrawal symptoms. These are all situations that could have been avoided. It is important for someone to think before they intake any drug even the mildest of forms because, who knows? They may be next to fall victim to
Kohlberg’s three levels of moral thinking provide different responses to what is considered morally right or wrong in this circumstance. The first level Kohlberg discusses is preconventional morality, where a person would respond to the dilemma by stating that performing the necessary action to save the life in danger would be a heroic deed, however it would entail breaking the rules to do so, so it would be morally wrong to steal the drug. The second level is conventional morality, where an individual would come to the conclusion that stealing the drug would be a criminal act and put the individual’s social
Provide the justifications for punishment in modern society. Punishment functions as a form of social control and is geared towards “imposing some unwanted burden such as fines, probations, imprisonment, or even death” on a convicted person in return for the crimes they committed (Stohr, Walsh, & Hemmens, 2013, p.6). There are four main justifications for punishment and they are: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. There is also said to be a fifth justification of reintegration as well.
... for taking the drug even though the willing addict has no control over his will.
Punishment has been in existence since the early colonial period and has continued throughout history as a method used to deter criminals from committing criminal acts. Philosophers believe that punishment is a necessity in today’s modern society as it is a worldwide response to crime and violence. Friedrich Nietzche’s book “Punishment and Rehabilitation” reiterates that “punishment makes us into who we are; it creates in us a sense of responsibility and the ability to take and release our social obligations” (Blue, Naden, 2001). Immanuel Kant believes that if an individual commits a crime then punishment should be inflicted upon that individual for the crime committed. Cesare Beccaria, also believes that if there is a breach of the law by individuals then that individual should be punished accordingly.