There are criminals that have committed 1st degree murder against innocent lives and yet still have the chance to live life. The consequences they face should be equal to the crime they committed. If someone takes someone else’s life, the same should be done to them; either through life in prison or the death penalty. People who commit 1st degree murder should automatically be given the death penalty, because if they are one day set free they are placing a risk on the lives of other citizens. The same is true for those who commit 2nd degree murder. They have the intention of harming someone, even if they don’t, so these offenders should not be back out into the community. There have been many states that have done away with capital punishment thinking they will see a decrease in crimes. “Supporters of capital punishment rewrote sentencing statutes to make certain that the death penalty was utilized in a fair and equal manner” (Issitt 1). Although, that has been true for some states, but for others the crime rate has just increased. Yes, life imprisonment and the death penalty may seem a bit too exaggerated for some offenses, but when someone takes another humans life, or has the intentions too, they become a danger to families everywhere. Capital punishment should be reinforced for all crimes involving rape, 1st and 2nd degree murder; let the punishment fit the crime done so we can see a decrease in these horrendous crimes. Rape is a very serious crime and offenders have been given a slap on the wrist punishment for that kind of crime. They should be …show more content…
Offenders who commit this crime should not be given life imprisonment, but the death penalty. When someone commits 1st degree murder, the consequence should be equal to the crime they committed. They should be executed, the same way they took another person’s life. 1st degree murder is very common nowadays and most suspects don’t get the punishment that they
If you are in a rush to attend a very important meeting and you can not find a parking spot, would you risk parking your car in a restricted zone if you knew the fee would only be 25 dollars? Would you reconsider taking the risk of parking your car there if the ticket would be 500 dollars? If the consequences of an action are severe, how many people would take the risk of taking that action? If the penalty to pay for taking other people’s lives was death, would fewer people take the risk of committing such a crime? Life is the most precious possession one holds. When another human brutally robs another of this gift, it is the most heinous of all crimes. It is only justice if the punishment fits the crime committed, and for murder, the only punishment fit is the death penalty, therefore, the capital punishment should be retained in all the States as a means of justice and a clear message for potential criminals out there not to follow.
If a person is so uncompassionate about human life and does not care what happens, is sick enough to harm someone else, they should also pay the price of their lives. Violent criminals will always exist in society and the death penalty will only decrease these numbers gradually, however every violent criminal that does not exist in society makes society a safer place. Placing these criminals in prison with a life sentence does not deter them from committing another crime. This just enables them to plan, plot and proceed with the next murder, escape or worse. The majority of people that commit heinous crimes that call for the death penalty cannot be reformed....
Imagine, a good friend of yours. Better yet, imagine a loved one, perhaps a little brother or sister or son or daughter. Now try to imagine life without them, simply because the murderer thought that he was above the law. Who knows, maybe he or she was just bored and decided to take a life. What if someone took the life of your child or loved one? What are we to do about the person(s), such as these murderers who decide that they can take a loved one's life. Obviously, anyone who takes one's life, other than self defense, should not ever be let out into everyday society to function in everyday life, because such as this are from normal. Those that prey on the weak will always prey on them. A majority of those convicted and sentenced to capital punishment were "repeat offenders that continually prey on the weak and
I believe that capital punishment is necessary to ensure justice. Certain criminals commit crimes so great that they warrant death. The emotional tolls of the people around the victim can be alleviated by the death of the perpetrator. Prisons are inherently difficult to run, and capital punishment reduces the efforts that must be expended to successfully manage a prison. Capital punishment reduces crime in the way that it offers an incentive great enough to prevent offenses such as mass murder. Capital punishment holds much support in its favor, and I believe that it should remain.
Even though many people believe that justice is carried out when someone who has hurt many people is killed, the fact is that it is creating even more injustice because it involves taking another life. The truth is that the death penalty is not a form of justice but rather a form of revenge (Don’t give Tsarnaev death penalty). The fact is that the right form of justice is when people who have committed the crime are put in jail and are prevented from killing anyone ever again. The problem is that many people believe that sometimes the criminal is let off easy by being allowed to live but really it is the one thing keeping us from becoming criminals ourselves. If we start to kill everybody that was involved in the death of others then we
Capital punishment is the execution of a perpetrator for committing a heinous crime (homicide), and it is a hotly debated topic in our society. The basic issue is whether capital punishment should be allowed as it is today, or abolished in part or in whole. My argument is that:
When a person inquires about death, they never expect that it will arrive early to meet them. A part of these innocent people never see it coming, but they are reconciled with death early as a result of another person’s malicious behavior. These people need to be punished by paying an equal price for what they stole from someone else: their life. Once a person is deemed a killer they are no longer a use to a society, they are a threat. Keeping them alive costs money that could be put to better use. Insurance is granted to them, even though they do not have a job and there are other hard working people who deserve it. They are given a decent home with accommodations that homeless people are forced to live without. There is an abundant amount of gray area in making a decision of this magnitude. The argument of being falsely accused often arises because once a mistake like this is made it obviously can not be undone. However, the Death Penalty is essential to keep the innocent citizens of the country safe.
It is unnerving to think that everyday some of the most unspeakable murders and killings take place just under the noses of the authorities and normal people. The killers responsible for these crimes are threats to society and deserve capital punishment. The death penalty is an acceptable and fair method of punishment because it serves justice, provides victim’s families with closure, and increases safety.
If the death penalty has been declared legal, then the federal and state governments must employ it to its fullest as a means of stopping previous murderers from recommitting their crimes. Since most of the prisoners on death row are there for murder, executing them would ensure that they would never kill again. Obsessive murderers, who know no alternative to killing, need to be executed to protect both prison guards and society. This view is perhaps best illustrated through the words of Judge Alfred J. Talley of New York who explained “If I as an individual have the right to kill in self defense, why has not the state, which is nothing more than an aggregation of individuals, the same right to defend itself against unjust aggression and unjust attack?” (Kaplan 28) About two and a half years ago, my dear cousin, Jaime, became the first victim of a serial killer named Brian Duffy.
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If so, what would you want from the government if the person had killed someone you know? Should they receive the death penalty? Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they commit and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims who had to go through an event such as murder.
Therefore, people do not have to worry too much about whether they will be killed or thieved by those criminals. Also, people especially who are victims want the death penalty because of the retribution for criminals. The Michigan State University (2000) mentioned that “only the taking of the murderer's life restores the balance and allows society to show convincingly that murder is an intolerable crime which will be punished in kind”(p.5). Due to the fact that the civil liberties of all people are fair, there are no valid reasons that people deprive others of lives. The murders must get sternly penalized if they kills other people.
... system is overflowing with many cases involving violent crime, but it doesn't seem rational to have a system in place where there are cases where first degree murder has occurred and the sentence doesn't match the violation. I believe that if you take a life, you deserve a life sentence in prison. Allowing criminals to get away with murder is something that will hurt all of us. If we live in a world where this continues to happen, the system will fail to do its job to protect our city's from the worst kind of criminal.
People should get the death penalty because if there is a bigger consequence for their actions, there wouldn't be as many people in jail. The death penalty should be adopted as a more common consequence of crime as soon as possible. Bibliography:.. Works Cited Bender and Leone. The Death Penalty.
Murder should be punished in a manner similar to the way it was committed. A man convicted of a cold-blooded shooting murder such as a drive-by shooting should go before a firing squad. Each man in that firing squad would fire one at a time so the convicted would not know when the angel of death would come for him. A man convicted of strangulation murder should be hung at high noon. A man convicted of a beating death should be slowly beaten until death comes. A Jeffery Dahmer style murderer should suffer dismemberment and decapitation.
Too many people get to live a full functioning life in prison even after committing heinous crimes. Meanwhile, the families of the victims are left with grievance and despair. If the criminal was callous and malicious enough to carry out the plan to murder someone then they should be ready to face their consequences. If the death penalty were used more frequently, it would deter most criminals from committing these crimes. If life in prison was no longer and option for premeditated murder, but only the death penalty was used, there would be a steady decrease in the amount of murders nationwide. Harsher punishments will set an example to other