Why Did Davis Win The Civil War Essay

1834 Words4 Pages

Military policy and tactics are a major contributing factor to what ultimately wins or loses a war. In a war in which two sides of a single country are fighting each other, one can only imagine the difficulties in conceiving the proper strategies to win a war of such nature. Both Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis found themselves facing this unfathomable situation at the infancy of the American Civil War. The role of Commander in Chief is undoubtedly an important one, but it is made paramount during wartime. Although both certainly performed admirably, the Northern Union ultimately beat the Southern Confederacy. There are many reasons for this victory, but having the competent and determined Lincoln at the helm had a tremendous …show more content…

Over the course of the war, the Confederacy teetered between offensive and defensive campaigns. Although Davis reportedly preferred a, “thoroughly defensive, survival-oriented grand strategy,” according to Steven E. Woodworth, his actions and orders didn’t always reflect this preference. Some notable campaigns that turned the tide of war were General Robert E. Lee and General Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson repelling McCllelan’s forces from the Rappahannock peninsula, and Lee’s later campaigns in Virginia and Kentucky. The term offensive-defensive came about as a result of these campaigns. It wasn’t clear if Davis was in full support of this strategy, but Lee most definitely was, and Lee was Davis’s champion similarly to Grant for Lincoln. Lee felt that, “There is nothing to be gained by this army remaining quietly on the defensive,” and when the Confederate situation grew more desperate, Lee told Jubal Early, “we must destroy this army of Grant’s before he gets to the James River. If he gets there, it will become a siege and then it will be a mere question of time.” Although Davis had a superior military background, his wishy-washy interactions with his generals, and support of different strategies was his

Show More
Related

  • Book Analysis of Stephen W. Sears’ Landscape Turned Red

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sears’ thesis is the Union could have won the war faster. McClellan was an incompetent commander and to take the initiative to attack an defeat the Confederate army. The Army of Northern Virginia, under...

    Read More

  • Summary: Why The North Won The Civil War

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, showed weaknesses within his leadership which may have contributed to the confederacy’s loss and the unions win . Davis failed in three vital ways. These ways were: his relations with other confederate authorities and with the people, as well as in his fundamental concept of his job as president and in his organization and specific handling of his role as commander in chief . Davis failed in maintaining communication with leaders and with his people, often unable to admit when he is wrong which led to lack organization in his role . In addition, Davis was a conservative leader, not a revolutionary one which meant that his strength was often in protocol and convention rather than in innovation . Studying each of these aspects that represented a weakness in Jefferson Davis’s leadership, Lincoln in comparison provided more admirable and outstanding qualities within his leadership which in many ways affected the outcome of the war

    Read More

  • The Killer Angels Analysis

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, neither of the generals exceeded the other when it comes to military strategies, which rather debunks Shaara’s depiction of Longstreet’s advanced knowledge of modern warfare. Despite of the importance of the Battle of Gettysburg, often marked as the turning point of the war, General Longstreet should not obey an order that results in a significant loss of men that would be extremely difficult to replace at this time. Already limited by the amount of men still able to fight, pushing additional forces in an open battle would just nearly deplete the confederate soldiers completely. Since this battle was one that went on until a majority of ones sided were depleted, the south should have played it safe against the Unions nearly surplus supply of

    Read More

  • Was Northern Victory in the Civil War Inevitable?

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    Several factors played in to the American Civil War that made it have the outcome that it did. Although the South had better trained officials due to their military school, the North was far more advanced than they. The North had the advantage over the South in several ways. However, the outcome of the Civil War was not inevitable: it was determined as much by human decisions and human willpower as by physical resources, although the North’s resources gave them an edge over the South.

    Read More

  • Did the North Win the Civil War before it Began?

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    The conservative stands Lincoln originally held were broken with the Emancipation Proclamation, causing a massive internal struggle in the South to bring them down. This is why the North had already won to the extent of Lincoln’s conservative political stands. “Having taken an oath to preserve and defend the Constitution, which protected slavery, “I did not consider that I had a right to touch the ‘State’ institution of ‘Slavery’ until all other measures for restoring the Union had failed….”” (Who Freed The Slaves, pg 203) The attrition strategy was halted with the mental conversion of the war being a moral war and the internal divisions in the South would finally clinch victory for the North. However all other advantages were possessed by the North and therefore the North had won the Civil War before it began to the extent of Lincoln’s conservative political stands.

    Read More

  • Frederick Spooner's Victory In The Civil War

    1268 Words  | 3 Pages

    The civil war brought upon an enormous amount of excitement in the Northern states. Many believed that the war would be a quick and easy victory over the weaker Southern states. Frederick Spooner wrote to his brother saying that because of slavery the South had become weakened and that he had no doubt in his mind that the North would have a swift win in this war. Spooner made his stance on slavery quite clear. He was completely against everything about it. Frederick Douglass was a former slave and prominent figure in the black community for his stance against all practices of slavery. Both men were clear that they were disgusted by slavery in America. Spooner thought the war was being waged solely for the purpose of abolishing slavery. Douglass would agree, but he also saw this as a chance for black men to fight in this war and gain respect from

    Read More

  • The Battle of Cold Harbor

    1740 Words  | 4 Pages

    Grant viewed the Battle of Cold Harbor as a means to complete his Overland Campaign, and ultimately, be the driving force for Union victory of the Civil War. Grant chose the Army of the Potomac to be the decisive operation and General George G. Meade acted as the commander. Though both Generals were experienced leaders, they had different skills, abilities and opinions that not only led to a dysfunctional command climate, but also was a major reason for the Union loss of the Battle of Cold Harbor. Grant viewed his command position as a strategic role with subordinate Meade making the tactical decisions, but Meade did not view...

    Read More

  • Why the South Could Not Win the Civil War

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    The right military strategy is the key to a war. In order for the South to win the war, they would have needed to apply what is now called a blitzkrieg strategy. This would have been a quick decisive attack on the North to follow up its early victories of Manassas in the East and at Wilson's Creek and Lexington in the West.

    Read More

  • Robert E Lee

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lee is very quick; he organized scattered confederate troops into the famed Army of Northern Virginia in just three weeks. Lee’s wisdom urged him to keep the Union as far away as possible from the armament producing center of Richmond and far away from the northern part of the state where farmers were harvesting crops. Lee knows that defeats of such decisive sports will weaken our will to continue the war, and he prevented this at all costs.

    Read More

  • Key Factors That Led to Union Victory in the Civil War

    2114 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Civil War that took place in the United States from 1861 to 1865 could have easily swung either way at several points during the conflict. There is however several reasons that the North would emerge victorious from this bloody war that pit brother against brother. Some of the main contributing factors are superior industrial capabilities, more efficient logistical support, greater naval power, and a largely lopsided population in favor of the Union. Also one of the advantages the Union had was that of an experienced government, an advantage that very well might have been one of the greatest contributing factors to their success. There are many reasons factors that lead to the North's victory, and each of these elements in and amongst themselves was extremely vital to the effectiveness of the Northern military forces. Had any one of these factors not been in place the outcome of the war could have been significantly different, and the United States as we know it today could be quite a different place to live.

    Read More

  • Why The North Won the Civil War

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... yet they strongly believed that they could be victorious. Despite numerous disadvantages, the South entered the war with some important advantages. The South adopted a strategy like that of George Washington in the American Revolution. The plan, known as attrition, called for a strategy of winning the war by avoiding losing. That is, the South did not have to match the North's resources, they only needed to avoid full-scale battles and prolong the war making it too costly for their opponents.

    Read More

  • Civil War and The South's Loss

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Why did the North win the Civil War?” is only half of a question by itself, for the other half is “Why did the South lose the Civil War?” To this day historians have tried to put their finger on the exact reason for the South losing the war. Some historians blame the head of the confederacy Jefferson Davis; however others believe that it was the shear numbers of the Union (North). The advantages and disadvantages are abundant on either sides of the argument, but the most dominate arguments on why the South lost the war would be the fact that state’s rights prevented unification of the South, Jefferson Davis' poor leadership and his failure to work together with his generals, the South failed to gain the recognition of the European nations, North's superior resources made the outcome inevitable, and moral of the South towards the end of the war.

    Read More

  • The Battle of Gettysburg Analysis

    1961 Words  | 4 Pages

    After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville in May of 1863, General Robert E. Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia embarked on their 2nd invasion of the north. General Lee’s first campaign into the north resulted in the Confederate defeat at Antietam. The failure of Lee’s first northern campaign raises the question of his motives. The Confederate Army was...

    Read More

  • Failure of Mission Command by General McClellan

    2308 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Battle of Antietam could have been a devastating and fatal blow to the Confederate Army if Gen. McClellan acted decisively, took calculated risks, and veered away from his cautious approach to war. There are many instances leading up to the battle and during the battle in which he lacks the necessary offensive initiative to effectively cripple and ultimately win the war. This paper is intended to articulate the failure of Mission Command by GEN McClellan by pointing out how he failed to understand, visualize, describe and direct the battlefield to his benefit.

    Read More

  • Lincoln: The Struggle for the 13th Amendment

    1157 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Lincoln, knew how and when to use what strategy. He understood the importance the correct tactic at the correct time and was very pragmatic. Whether it was power, trading votes with federal jobs, persuasion skills, emotional appeal etc. for instance, he used ending the civil war as a result of passing the amendment to gain acceptance for abolition of slavery which otherwise was very difficult. He also used his being popular and respected by the masses to his favor and also understood the fact that it was his only chance is to get the bill passed into law before the impending end to the civil war and thus he stressed on the speed at which progress was being made. He along with Mr. William Seward who was the Secretary of State set about building a coalition to secure sufficient votes in the Congress. It wasn’t that getting the bill passed was a cake walk for Mr. President on the

    Read More

More about Why Did Davis Win The Civil War Essay

Open Document