The Killer Angels Analysis

1164 Words3 Pages

The Killer Angels The novel The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara depicts the story behind one of the bloodiest, and highly significant, battles of the American Civil War, the battle of Gettysburg. The battle consisted of 51,000-casualties between the Union and Confederate army forces. Mainly focused on letters, journal entries, and memoirs, Shaara tells the story of Gettysburg by using characters from both sides of the war. The characters chosen grasp the divergent views regarding the impending days of the war, and countless numbers of those views develop throughout the novel. Such views come from the Confederates own General Lee and General Longstreet, and the Unions own Colonel Chamberlain and soldiers from both sides. From those depicted …show more content…

A numerous amount of generals and soldiers of the south had a predisposed idea regarding what every person was fighting for, and from the looks of it, they were more so on the same page. When referring to what the war was being fought over, Englishmen Pickett used an analogy that gives reference to a “gentlemen’s club”, and not being able to maneuver out of it (Shaara 88). The men believed that the war conceived out of the misinterpretation of the constitution in regards to what or what not they had the right to do. In all, a large number of those fighting believed that the confederate army fought to protect the southern society, and slavery as an integral part of …show more content…

Therefore, neither of the generals exceeded the other when it comes to military strategies, which rather debunks Shaara’s depiction of Longstreet’s advanced knowledge of modern warfare. Despite of the importance of the Battle of Gettysburg, often marked as the turning point of the war, General Longstreet should not obey an order that results in a significant loss of men that would be extremely difficult to replace at this time. Already limited by the amount of men still able to fight, pushing additional forces in an open battle would just nearly deplete the confederate soldiers completely. Since this battle was one that went on until a majority of ones sided were depleted, the south should have played it safe against the Unions nearly surplus supply of

Show More
Related

  • Why the Southern States Believed they Could Win the Civil War

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    Why did the southern states believe they could win the civil war? The southern states, known as the Confederacy were very confident going into this war that they could successfully defend their rights' and their way of life. They had many reasons for being so confident. First, the southern leaders were sure the north was not going to have a full-scale military conflict. They thought that a compromise and peace agreement could be reached after a short period of fighting. Second, the south was going to fight a defensive war. Third, the southern lifestyle made them familiar with firearms and horseback riding. Therefore they would be better soldiers than the northerners. Fourth, the south had a great source of wealth in its cotton exports and felt they would be able to fund the war. Last, the south thought that France and Britain would come to its aid. The south didn't want to defeat the north they wanted a compromise. Therefore, the north would not have the authority to govern them. The south did not have to win the war, it just had to keep the north from winning. On March 7, 1861 Jefferson Davis selected John Forsyth, A. B. Roman, and Martin J. Crawford to represent the Confederacy in a meeting with Lincoln's administration. Not trying two overpower anyone, the Confederate leaders said they simply wanted to be left alone. The Confederates thought to defend its region from being taken over and to keep its armies from destruction they would have to fight a very well planned out defensive war. The Confederate armies did not have to invade the north to win that kind of war. They need only to endure long enough to force the north to the decision that th...

    Read More

  • What They Fought For by James McPherson's

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    In James McPherson’s novel, What They Fought For, a variety of Civil War soldier documents are examined to show the diverse personal beliefs and motives for being involved in the war. McPherson’s sample, “is biased toward genuine fighting soldiers” (McPherson, 17) meaning he discusses what the ordinary soldier fought for. The Confederacy was often viewed as the favorable side because their life style relied on the war; Confederates surrounded their lives with practices like slavery and agriculture, and these practices were at stake during the war. On the other hand, Northerners fought to keep the country together. Although the Civil War was brutal, McPherson presents his research to show the dedication and patriotism of the soldiers that fought and died for a cause.

    Read More

  • Book Analysis: Killer Angels

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    Killer Angels, written by Michael Shaara, takes place in Gettysburg in the year of 1863. Prohibiting slavery in the states that did not yet become states triggered the start of the Civil War. Fort Sumter in Charleston Bay was where the war was triggered by the Confederate Army opening fire on the federal garrison and forced it to surrender. For three long years, Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia delayed attacks by the Union Army of the Potomac. All principal confederate armies surrendered by the spring of 1865.

    Read More

  • Gettysburg Address versus Letter to His Son

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thousands of men died in November 1863. Within in a couple of days bodies laid scattered across the battle fields while tens of thousands men sat in a hospital. All of these men participated in one thing, the Civil War. Fighting for the rights of the people and what our constitution stood for. Families and friends had to pick a side, South or the North. Each had their reasoning for why they stood to fight, but surprisingly their reasoning was similar. Each state was proud they live in a country that had broken away from British. They marveled at the idea that all men are created and equal and have certain rights. Americans were proud. Proud to the point that they never stopped pay attention to all that they did. Proud because they put laws on humans and threw them into bondage. In 1861 people started to take sides. In some ways it was unconstitutional, but in others they were fighting for the people. The Civil War had begun. The fate of our country was in the hands of the people. On opposite sides of the war, Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee wrote The Gettysburg Address and Letter to His Son there were three astonishingly similarities and differences in the two works: the people are one, acts were unconstitutional and the nation is on shaky ground.

    Read More

  • Turning Point in the American Civil War

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the American civil war, Gettysburg is perhaps the turning point of the war, and it is also the last invasion on North American soil. Gettysburg, at the time, was just a small-time town before and during the civil war any, yet forever changed after the battle. A lot of people may remember the battle of Gettysburg by Pickett’s charge or Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, but anyone would not think about what actually happened during the battle. People may not realize that there were over 50,000 casualties over the three day battle, or how the North had the high ground, which would be a military advantage, most of the time. (Battle of Gettysburg. Summary and facts, July1-3, 1863). Gettysburg will always be a battle that will be held with much controversy with today’s historians and a battle that helped the North secure a victory.

    Read More

  • Pickett's Charge

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the American Civil War, there were many major battles that contributed to the Union army proving victorious and the Confederacy suffering defeat. One of which that could be considered the most significant was the Battle of Gettysburg. A three day scuffle that essentially led to the dismantling of the entire southern war effort, Gettysburg is highly remembered as the biggest and bloodiest battle of the war. However, the final assault by the Confederate army on the third day of warfare was detrimental to the overall outcome of the battle. This brutal strike is also a perfect testament to the Confederate soldier’s courage and passion for their respective cause and ideals. In other words, it takes sincere discipline to march across open grasslands in clear sight, and rush headlong into a heavily fortified position held by the enemy. This attack is most widely known as Pickett’s Charge, an all-out Confederate offensive resulting in immense casualties for both sides involved.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Michael Shaara's Killer Angels

    659 Words  | 2 Pages

    Killer Angels was written by Michael Shaara, it was published in 1974. The book Killer Angels tells about the story of the battle of Gettysburg. The battle of Gettysburg was the biggest battle of the American Civil War. The battle started on July 1, 1863. The major points in this battle is the Union Army(North) and the Confederate Army(South). They novel talks about certain characters that relate to the commanders during the Civil War. Robert E. Lee was the commander of the Confederate Army and James Longstreet is Lee second in command. Another name is also brought up during the novel is Colonel Joshua Lawrence, he is on the side of the union. Why Lawrence is brought up a lot is because he took major part in the the fighting of the little Round Top.

    Read More

  • Killer Angels Chapter Summary

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Longstreet is smart and very strategic, and he isn’t afraid to voice his opinion. But he is a solider to the core he will obey order to the letter and he isn’t afraid to be in front of the battle lines. His plan might have won the battle of Gettysburg if Lee would have been more open to ideas. Longstreet is a very good leader but he is also a follower too. Lee sent his up the hill time after time till the wasn’t hardly and men to fight. Longstreet wanted to let the fight come to them and get the out in the open and/or go up the right side to flank them. But Lee shot down those

    Read More

  • The Killer Angels Summary

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Killer Angels is a historical novel that was written by a man named Michael Shaara. He received the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1975. This book tells the story of what happened before and during the Battle of Gettysburg. On the 1st of July 1863 the Union army, and the Confederate army fought in the largest battle of the Civil War. When the war/ battle was finished, both sides combined together lost about 51,000 men; these men were either killed, wounded, missing. The characters that are told in the story are based on real life people such as, General Robert E. Lee who was the leader of the Confederate army, General James Longstreet who was the 2nd leader after Lee, and Joshua Chamberlain who was one of the famous men that fought on Little Round Top in the Battle of Gettysburg.

    Read More

  • The Battle of Gettysburg Analysis

    1961 Words  | 4 Pages

    While many variables are vital to a successful army on the battlefield, none should be neglected. Each variable discussed in this examination will prove to be important, but the information battle will be paramount in the battle of Gettysburg. Gettysburg After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville in May of 1863, General Robert E. Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia embarked on their 2nd invasion of the north. General Lee’s first campaign into the north resulted in the Confederate defeat at Antietam. The failure of Lee’s first northern campaign raises the question of his motives.

    Read More

  • Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    The book I chose for my report is The Killer Angels, a civil war novel by Michael Shaara. Shaara graduated from Rutgers University in 1951 and published many fictional short stories along with a few other novels. He won the Pulitzer Prize For Fiction for this book in 1975. At the start of The Killer Angels Shaara includes an intro titled “To the Reader”. In it he explains that there are many versions told about what happened at Gettysburg and so in writing his book he stayed away from sources with opinions and went all the way back to the letters and documents of the men who fought there. He also includes that he condensed some action for clarity and at times had to choose between conflicting sources. I believe that overall Shaara is credible and that the facts are genuine.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of James Mcpherson's What They Fought For

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    James McPherson, in his short What they Fought For, makes the argument that American and Confederate soldiers had numerous reasons for fighting in the Civil War. According to McPherson, soldiers were acutely aware of the complex political, moral, and economic reasons for the American conflict, and these reasons factored into their decision to fight for one side or the other. To come to this conclusion McPherson uses the letters from numerous soldiers on both sides of the conflict, most of which are written to their family members or significant others back at home. This is where the fault lays in McPherson’s idea that the soldiers had some type of high minded political or ethical reasons for fighting in the Civil War. The idea that soldiers would be willing to march into ferocious battle, where the possibility of death or disfigurement is appallingly high for political reasons is nonsensical. It is much more likely that they fought due to the fact that they knew that they had fellow soldiers depending on them, and they didn’t want to let them down.

    Read More

  • Angels In America Analysis

    1811 Words  | 4 Pages

    Tragic Analysis of Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes Tony Kushner’s Angels in America, is an illustrative analysis of the AIDS epidemic in the United States during the 1980s. The play is split into two separate pieces entitled Millennium Approaches and Perestroika, which initially focus on the gay couple of Prior Walter and Louis Ironson before panning out into several complex storylines that often intersect. Due to the nature of its plot, Angels in America does not focus on a single tragic protagonist, but rather shadows the separate individual relationships between people in the community through their destruction and eventual renaissance, similar to Elizabethan drama. Over the course of the work, the plot of Angels in America parallels the characteristics of modern tragedy, propelled by the drama of ordinary people’s day-to-day lives. As such, Angels in America would best be analyzed through the utilization of Arthur Miller’s essay, “Tragedy and the Common Man” based on its outline of the definition of tragedy.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gettysburg Address

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War – a bloody, ruthless American war – was fought over the course of five years. To worsen the affair, rather than fighting some far off, foreign enemy, they were fighting their fellow countrymen- their brothers. Across that five year span, over six hundred thousand Americans were killed (American Civil War). One of the deadliest, unforgettable battles of the war was the Battle of Gettysburg. This memorable battle surprisingly lasted a mere three days, and after the battle the president, Abraham Lincoln, delivered a speech that reflected the battle. His speech, just like the battle, was immensely memorable and carried with it a massive impact, yet it only lasted two minutes and consists of three short paragraphs. Addressing his fellow Americans with the speech, Lincoln calls for them to keep pushing forward.

    Read More

  • Women In The Unvanquished

    1558 Words  | 4 Pages

    The documentary on the Battle of Gettysburg, directed by Adrian Moat, grants its watchers a visible depiction of the stories of soldiers, and horrors of battle during the Civil War. However, one aspect that might be overlooked is the civilian participation in this battle. Had I done the documentary on Gettysburg, I would have dramatized the story of the civilian, Daniel Skelly, a teenager in the town of Gettysburg at the time. He worked as a store clerk in a “Dry Goods” store at the time of the battle and witnessed the chaos that ensued first hand. He was tasked with taking care of his mother, while tending to wounded Union soldiers at the same time. After the battle, he published the book, “A Boy’s Experience During the Battle of Gettysburg,”

    Read More

More about The Killer Angels Analysis

Open Document