Why Are The Crusades Successful

1262 Words3 Pages

The Crusade became predominantly French, reflecting Urban's origins and France's chivalric ideals. French knights embraced the cause fervently, leading to significant achievements. After reclaiming Antioch in 1098, they marched triumphantly on Jerusalem in 1099. The city fell amidst brutal violence, with Muslims slaughtered and Jews burned alive in the main synagogue, actions seen as celebrating their conquest. Urban's leadership and the French knights' zeal were instrumental in the early successes of the Crusades. France's strong sense of chivalry and devotion to the Church fueled their commitment to the cause, driving them to reclaim holy sites from perceived desecration. The French Crusaders played a significant role in shaping the course …show more content…

After splitting from the main army of the First Crusade in 1098, he ventured east and founded a principality at Edessa. Within two years, he ascended to the throne of Jerusalem, succeeding his brother. Edessa, under his rule, remained a semi-independent Christian state until its fall to an Arab army in 1144, marking a significant setback for the Crusaders in the region. The fall of Edessa sent shockwaves through Christendom, challenging the assumptions of the First Crusade's success. The rapid loss of territory raised questions about God's favor and the moral standing of the Franks in the East. Reports of moral decline among the Crusaders had been circulating, leading some to question whether they were still worthy of defending the Holy Sites. The military inadequacy of the Crusaders became evident as the initial fervor of the Crusades waned. Western immigration slowed, and many pilgrims arrived unarmed, unprepared for battle. The Templars and Hospitallers, the only permanent military orders, were no match for Muslim commanders like Zengi. Recognizing the need for reinforcements, the Pope called for another Crusade, recognizing the urgent need to reclaim lost territory and protect the interests of Christendom in the East. Pope Eugenius III, in exile in France, approved the call for a new Crusade. Recognizing the need for strong secular leadership, he turned to Western princes to lead the effort. While Holy Roman Emperor Conrad of Hohenstaufen would have been a fitting choice, his focus on the civil war in Germany made him unavailable. King Roger of Sicily was also not considered. Ultimately, Royal French King Louis VII emerged as the sole viable candidate. Louis VII, in a gathering with his tenants-in-chief, expressed his intention to take up the cross and lead the Crusade. His fervor and contempt for earthly pleasures inspired those around him, yet many were hesitant to

Open Document