Reasons For The Failure Of The Third Crusade

567 Words2 Pages

Beginning not too long after the failure of the Second Crusade, the Third Crusade (also known as the Kings' Crusade) spanned from 1189 to 1192. It's purpose was to reclaim the Holy Land from Saladin, and was largely successful, and the European leaders managed to capture the cities Acre and Jaffa, as well undo the majority of Saladin's previous conquests. However, it was unable to capture Jerusalem, the key motivation to the Crusades. The key figures in this Crusade were Richard I of England (also known as Richard the Lionhearted), King Philip II of France, and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa. The Crusade began when the new Pope, Gregory VIII, declared that the capture of Jerusalem was punishment for sins committed Christians across Europe. A new Crusade to reclaim the Holy Land for the Christians was called for, and Henry II of England and Philip II of France ended the conflict between them to raise money to finance the campaign. The first to depart for the Holy Land was the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa, with an army of …show more content…

This was not the only way that the Third Crusade affected history, for example, the island of Cyprus remained in Latin hands, and was used as an ideal starting off point for future crusades, and Saladin and Richard signed a treaty to reestablish the Kingdom of Jerusalem, allowing Christians to visit Jerusalem as pilgrims. The Third Crusade also affected society, as it gave the coast from Jaffa to Christians, handed Ascalon back to Saladin after Richard’s men demolished the fortifications that they had painstakingly built, and allowed pilgrims to have access to the Holy Land. Saladin and Richard also signed a three-year peace treaty. On his return trip, Richard shipwrecked and was held for ransom by Leopold of

Open Document