Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of monument
Importance of monument
The importance of monuments to society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of monument
Monuments are attesting to the bravery, sacrifice, honor, and achievement of everyday people. We erect these testaments of greatness to remember what was done for us and our country. The cause for one, the scale and stature, the location, and the design are all factors that can really make or break, a monument.
To make a monument, there must be a great reason. The task must be significant in order to be commemorated for it. In Source A, Savage states, "...and the existence of a nation is confirmed in a simple but powerful way...grounded in the connection of individual to the collective body." Any monument, large or small, needs to have real depth to its meaning. We can't, for example, give a monument to a student for being accepted to a prestigious college. While this is a great achievement for that person, it doesn't have the gusto, greatness, and dedication to the betterment of our country and humanity as a whole to acknowledge it in such a
…show more content…
Is something grandiose and humongous something really necessary or is it unwanted, unnecessary and unwanted embellishment? Take the destruction of the peak of a mountain in South Dakota in Sioux land for example. In Source C, Downes states, "The South Dakota peak is being carved into a mounted likeness of Crazy Horse, the great Sioux leader…” Many Native Americans say that this could be considered as disrespect to their leader as he fought hard to protect the very land that's being chipped away from to make this monument. Leatrice Big Crow said, "...the memorial is one of those things that could go on swallowing money and effort forever." In other words, this face carved into the mountain was not the best choice and that other Native American tribes would like help rather than something like that. A smaller, more nature based monument would have been more accepted and appreciated than carving the 'face' of that beautiful
Monuments and museums are arenas of public history and for the formation and articulation of identities and narratives.[1] Decisions taken as to the formation of museums and the selection, display and organisation of exhibits are influenced by criteria which are not necessarily politically neutral; these may especially involve devices of political elites to emphasise aspects of communal togetherness and thus exert control over communities.[2] Memory and commemoration of past events and generations is by its nature a political and contested act, especially in sharply divided societies.[3] It is no surprise that recently established governments and states should particularly concern themselves with the production of such forms of festivities, commemorations, and monuments.[4] As rulers of a sharply divided society, unionist elites in Northern Ireland in the aftermath of its eventful creation in 1920-1 had particular reasons to concern themselves, and did concern themselves, with such strategies of power.[5] The integration of the province's Catholic minority may have been, or may have been felt to be, beyond the rulers of Northern Ireland;[6] but this very fact heightened the importance of preserving the highest possible degree of political unity under unionist hegemony among the Protestant majority.[7]
America’s history-both good and bad-has much to teach us. Taking down, destroying these monuments is erasing, rewriting the physical symbols of the nation. This type of cultural whitewashing is inglorious. We can treat these monuments as a cautionary tool to remind ourselves what we are and what we are not. The cost forebears paid for the freedom of the nation should be remembered; therefore, people should retain these statues to remind of themselves what these monuments represent.
The monument to commemorate Admiral Horatio Nelson was designed by William Railton (1800–77) and located in London. Fluted Corinthian order column is made of granite, containing a staircase leading to the top while its capital is cast in bronze. The pedestal is decorated with four bronze reliefs depicting Admiral Nelson’s four major battles, including the Battle of Trafalgar in which he lost his life. The top of the column is adorned with 5.5 meters high, Craigleith sandstone sculpture of the Admiral done by Edward Hodges Baily. The sculpture shows the admiral in uniform with a firm stance and right foot in front with a sword in the left hand resting on the ground as a symbol for readiness to defend the kingdom. Sir Edwin Landseer designed four bronze lions which were added at the base in 1867. Competition for the design was held two
The need to memorialize events or people is complex; in some cases, monuments honor moments of great achievement, while in other cases, monuments pay homage to deep sacrifice. A monument's size, location, and materials are all considerations when planning and creating a memorial to the past. Examples of such feats are the Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, and even Mount Rushmore. For the latter of the memorials, an entire mountain was dedicated to the faces of four major presidents.
A memorable monument is a historical structure that represents a significant person or event. They are designed to show the importance of either the person or event. Monuments are intended to last forever so the subject will never be forgotten to society. The factors that should be considered when creating a memorable monument are that the subject must be powerful and meaningful to society and the design should resemble the significance of the subject. These factors help communicate the magnitude of the individual or group’s sacrifice, as well as honor moments of great achievement in history.
Eye catching pieces like a giant reflective bean, or a woman holding a torch with a crown, or four men fighting to hoist our nation's flag. Each different place has it's own cultural viewpoints and personal taste. This shows the importance of history especially to Americans. We value our history and try to captivate it in a form that will be visible for ages. The different aspects going into the creation of buildings or monuments is simply put, monumental. To create a monument, the place, the theme and the response should be gauged beforehand to ensure it's building. Humans are inspired by their own doing just as much as they are by nature. Just who and why a statue is memorialized can be a very difficult topic to discuss, as will be discussed using varying sources.
Americans have often used art to symbolize the relationship between themselves and their history. Therefore, art is used to honor and remember someone or an event where people died, through a memorial. As an example, The National World War II Memorial is a memorial to honor and remember the people who served in World War II. The success or failure of a memorial depends on how well it represents the image that people have of a certain person or event. Especially in America because they find the construction of a national monument so controversial that no memorial has been erected in the National Mall without a discussion. The National World War II Memorial on the National Mall was a poor addition; its location diminishes the formerly open space between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, its design is vague, and it is a poor choice even when compared with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. A very good start.
The buildings that I chose to do were an advert for a powerful civilization. The emperors showed their power that they are the great leaders with a lot of money that could get many workers as they possibly could to erect their pattern of monument. The emperor Augustus used propaganda to ensure a vast base of support leading up to his renunciation in 27BC. The Roman emperors also built all these monuments in regard to public entertainment for their political advertising.
Our country faced a devastating change and the simplicity of the monument was the most ethical way to go about it. While many may disagree with me for whatever reasons my ethical perspective is situational meaning that my decisions or opinions vary given the situation. I have always made loved ones and love in general my top priority in life and I never had a word for my ethical stance until recently in the class. Johnson took into consideration what the family of the president wanted and what the citizens of the United States wanted and created a simple yet beautiful monument. I think that this is a good reflection on responsible use of persuasion because both parties; the viewers and the architect, were actively apart of the creation of the
The Jefferson Memorial is a testimonial to the past, present, and future of the United States. Its architecture, like most neo-Classical buildings, gives a sense of permanence. This permanence has a history far older than many would suspect. Centuries ago and thousands of miles away a building was erected that would later become the model for which many other buildings, including the Jefferson Memorial, are based upon. This building is the Roman Pantheon. Though the Jefferson Memorial borrows the basic form and elements from the Pantheon, the Memorial has distinctive differences from its predecessor.
and the importance of their history. It is the first monument to be added to the National Park
The building of this famous Roman structure is still a mystery to us today. However, the excavation of this site has helped archeologist better understand the structure itself and the way it was built. Along with this, it has helped us understand Roman culture and history more than we had before. The Colosseum is an extremely important part of Roman history and has shaped ancient Roman culture into what it is known as today.
Sources that address this topic are “The President Has No Power Unilaterally to Abolish a National Monument Under the Antiquities Act of 1906” by Robert Rosenbaum, “Antiquities Act: Scope of Authority for Modification of National Monuments” by Alexandra M. Wyatt, and “Presidential Authority to Revoke or Reduce National Monument Designations” by Yoo, John and Todd Gaziano. The article by Wyatt explains why Trump does not have the authority to reduce the size of existing national monuments, While Congress has the authority to reduce the size of national monuments, the president does not clearly have the authority to do so. Wyatt states in her article “legal analyses since at least the 1930s have concluded that the Antiquities Act, by its terms, does not authorize the President to repeal proclamations, and that the President also lacks implied authority to do so” (Wyatt). One article that supports Trump is by Yoo, John and Todd Gaziano and it states that Trump does in fact have the authority to reduce the size of national monuments. One quote from the article states “The Congress that enacted the Antiquities Act did not intend monuments of [such massive] size to be established by presidential designation” (Yoo and Gaziano 5).
I‘m not saying that this monument should be taken away and destroyed, I‘m saying that these people who want it on display should spend less time protesting and more time raising money to have a place built for their precious monument.
Monuments are a symbol of a significant time in history. Monuments represent life, death, success, and struggle just to name a few. They have become as important to society as the events they represent. They bring history alive to new generations and memories to those who experience them firsthand. Monuments create a bridge between generations. Many parents feel a certain indescribable joyfulness when they see the look in their child’s eyes they had went they viewed the same monument.