Who Was Responsible For Macbeth's Downfall

661 Words2 Pages

In the Shakespearean mystery novel, Macbeth, Macbeth is shown as a man of courage, valor and ingenuity to lead as a soldier of the royal kingdom, yet later he is easily influenced and enamored to do the unspeakable. Kill king Duncan. The ruler of Scotland. By deeming the king an obstacle; in the way of the crown, Macbeth sees it as a worthy price to pay for power. He has the dangerous ideology that he must become king through harsh measures, at the end of the story causes him to go insane with guilt. Macbeth takes full responsibility, and took the most essential role in the murder of Duncan, committing the assassination. At the starting point of the play, Macbeth demonstrates the ability to decide his own fate; be a loyal soldier to the king, defend the kingdom selflessly, yet subsequently is easily persuaded by others. The Weïrd Sisters give Macbeth a supposed prophecy of the future, where the king …show more content…

Lady Macbeth described Macbeth's desire perfectly, “And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full
Of direst cruelty! make thick my blood;” (Act I Scene 5). The bloodshed of king Duncan is punishable by treason, by the obvious sign of betrayal towards the kingdom. Macbeth shall be sent to a public execution in front of the public. Similarly to the Thane of Cawdor’s execution, (Act I Scene 3) where a point had to be made that no one could betray the king. Much less kill him, and for that reason Macbeth should be executed. Macbeth should pay the ultimate price for the atrocious crime of the assassination, and be executed; as the monster he is, to be made a mockery of, as he did. Macbeth is fully responsible for the killing of Duncan, by his inability to stop outside influences coercing him, and later showing how he grow insane with knowing he committed the murder. At the end of the play, Macbeth should be executed, to never be able to harm anyone else again, for his own selfish

Open Document