Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius caesars ambition
Julius caesars ambition
Different perspectives on julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius caesars ambition
While Caesar acts as a powerful, responsible, and encouraging leader, many people are not aware of his inner soul. The brain only aims for two things: gaining glory and power for himself. The conspirators were the pioneers to recognize and stand up against him just for our sake, before Caesar put Rome into ruins. When they did so much for us, then what’s so wrong in supporting and hailing these heroes? Caesar tends to hide his callous character when he acts like a compassionate creature in front of us, but secretly has cunning plans for himself. Being egotistical, superior, cunning, arrogant, and feeble in terms of health, ultimately lead to his downfall. He deserved to live shorter than his original fate and die in a dreadful way. A great, …show more content…
Compassionate however, is not something for which Caesar is known. Some might argue that many people love and obey Caesar since he didn’t have the intention of becoming a leader when they tried to crown him king. While this may be true, he did that only to impress the crowd and build his reputation. It was Caesar’s master plan; He wanted to act this way hoping the people might think he is a respectable person since he is not interested in gaining power. It was a success because the people thought the same way he wanted them to. Unlike other good leaders, Caesar is very arrogant, and thinks of himself as a very superior, courageous, and a powerful man. His stubbornness is highlighted when he ignores calpurnia’s dream until she begged him worse than a beggar. Good leaders are strong on their words and are not susceptible to flattering, however, Caesar easily falls for compliments. He is very deceptive to flattering when Decius Brutus flatters Caesar to attend the senate for his assassination. Also, Caesar ignoring his fate expands upon the same idea. It was not one time, nor one person who warned him, but the Soothsayer twice, Artemidorus with the letter, and finally the dream. In spite of all this, Caesar refused all the portents and welcomed the death faster than the original fate in a haunting
Julius Caesar was very heroic to the Roman people. He did a wonderful job in conquering
The Fall of the Republic was more than a single man, but Julius Caesar was definitely to blame for being a large part of the destruction of the Roman Republic. Caesar was responsible for the fall of the Republic for several reasons, the the civil war from which the Republic never really recovered in January of 49 BC, Caesar 's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and bringing into power the many of the men who would be important in the next set of civil wars.
Julius Caesar, even though he is considered great, turns out to contain many flaws. He believes himself to be untouchable, and has a confidence that he cannot be harmed, even though that is not the case. He says so when he says, “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on ...
He was making needed reforms and did good things for Rome. When they assassinated Caesar they opened a door to corruption and less order. While Caesar wasn’t in the Plebian class because of all his wealth and power, he made changes that many of them liked. Caesar was true to his people and that’s why he was well liked. He treated them all with respect. With such a well-liked leader assassination or murder of him will make many angry and without such reasoning the Conspirators are left in a troubled
Even though Julius Caesar portrayed positive qualities while performing negative actions, they were still positive in that as a leader, he was seen as strong and reliable. Keeping promises, though brutally, and obsessing over the image of himself and his empire did make Rome one of the greatest Empires of all times. Therefore, Caesar may have been harsh, but he was honest and committed to being a powerful leader and establishing a powerful
First of all, Caesar always felt entitled to himself and always had the audacity to see everyone as beneath him. A great example of Caesar’s bravery and fearlessness is when he was eighteen and was escape the punishment from the dictator Sulla, so in the process he was captured by pirates, who decided to be help for ransom. “When they demanded twenty talents for his ransom, he laughed at them for not knowing who he was, and spontaneously promised to give them fifty talents instead, Next after he had dispatched friends to various cites to gather the money…he felt so superior to them that whenever he wanted to sleep, he would order them to be quiet” . Even being surrounded by murderous pirates clearly out numbered, he refused to let them think that they were in charge while he was in their captivity for thirty-eight days.
How ruthless was Julius Caesar? Well, first, who was Julius Caesar? Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman general, statesmen, Consul, and Emperor born in 100 B.C. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. He did many appalling things for power, and many would consider him to be very ruthless, while others would say that he was not ruthless. Well, what does it mean to be ruthless? To be ruthless means having or showing no pity or compassion for others. If a person is ruthless they are very harsh, merciless, and cruel, and will do anything necessary to achieve what they want; they do not care about how their acts affect other people. So, was Julius Caesar ruthless or not? Did he sincerely care about other people, show compassion and pity, or did he do whatever necessary to get what he wanted? Although some of
“Caesar was a brilliant general, a clever engineer, and administrator of genius, and a leader who demanded and commanded loyalty. He also was a corrupt politician” (Dando-Collins 4). Caesar would go on to be a dictator and his gain in power would corrupt him. He often bypassed the Senate, taking their power away. With Caesar’s growing power the Senate feared that they would soon lose their political relevance.
Each of the two characters gained some kind of wisdom before they came to an unhappy end. Caesar found out that one of his best friends, Brutus, had betrayed him just seconds before he died from the daggers of the conspirators. Brutus also learns something before he dies. When he knows that Cassius had committed suicide, he too commits suicide. He knew that be doing that, Caesar’s ghost was truly avenged.
In Shakespeare’s play the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar’s personal flaws lead him to his own destruction. There are three major flaws that shape Julius Caesar complete obliteration his pride, arrogance and determination. For instance, Caesar’s pride is one of his most seen flaws from the start of the play to the end of the play. In Act 2 Scene 2 line 65-107, “Caesars wife, Calpurnia begs Caesar not to go to the capitol because of a dream that she had which she fears that something bad will happen to Caesar if he goes. Calpurnia tells Caser to tell Decius that he is sick and that’s why he cannot go to the capitol. Although, Caesar takes what Calpurnia said into thought but that is quick lived and lastly he says the following “How foolish
Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar is presented to be very arrogant, indomitable and of course, prideful. These egotistical traits that Julius Caesar possessed were the leading cause of his murder, mainly his pride, which made this his tragic flaw. There were many warnings Julius Caesar received about his death and he would have still been alive if he had acknowledged them. Instead he chose to continue to protect his status of being a fearless, audacious ruler, which in the end, cost him his life.
With all that cockiness, it is no surprise that he has an enormous ego. This is projected many times in the play and it is no secret that he thinks highly of himself. For instance, when Calpurnia talks to him about him not going out for his own safety, he proudly answers her with “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me, Ne'er looked but on my back.
When Caesar is contemplating heading his wife's advice and staying home he suddenly remembers who he is and how indestructible he is: “Caesar should be a beast without a heart, If he should stay at home today for fear. No, Caesar shall not. Danger knows full well That Caesar is more dangerous than he. (Act 2 Scene 2 Page 2). Caesar clearly shows the opinion he has of himself as well as the the idea of the opinions the rest of the Roman empire has of him to, which is that he is almost a God among men.
The Ghost of Caesar appeared before Brutus saying, “To tell thee thou shalt see me at Philippi,” (Shakespeare.4.3.290). Even though Caesar forsook the superstitious things that he believed, he still came back as a supernatural phantom to warn the friend who betrayed him about his death. Shakespeare tried to portray that this superstitious event was caused by Caesar’s will, belief in the supernatural and his faith that even after killing him his friend would still heed his advice. His belief in superstitions caused him to have a little bit of extra life, and allowed him to warn Brutus of the coming danger to him. In some ways this was Caesar’s way of trying to atone for not listening to the signs he had seen.
Shakespeare shows Caesar to be, what you could say, a contradiction. The audience see how Caesar respects Antony's soldier-ship yet still fights him; they see how he clearly loves his sister, but uses her unscrupulously as a political device; and they are shown how he is very rational and dull, yet he surprisingly tells his soldiers, as well as some Egyptians about how he would parade the defeated Cleopatra. He wants to do this because he feels that 'her life in Rome would be eternal in our triumph.' This shows the reader how Caesar has strong emotional outcries, which contrasts his initial characteristics.