Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay about into the wild
A essay about into the wild
Chris mccandless description
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How Responsible is Chris McCandless for his Death?
Chris McCandless was a young man who attempted to escape the firm grasp of society, and to do so he embarked on unaccompanied hike into the Alaskan wilderness. In the novel Into the Wild written by Jon Krakauer, the author narrates Chris’s excursion into solitude, and the effects of his actions. Chris McCandless is mostly responsible for his death in the Alaskan wilderness.
Some people believe that Chris is not responsible for his death. In attempt to eat, Chris ingested a poisonous plant, which led to his death. He was completely innocent, and along with many other scientists did not know this particular plant harnessed a poisonous aspect. Secondly, Chris ventured into the wilderness in attempt to escape from his abusive parents. He wanted to live his life to the fullest, and he just happened to receive the
…show more content…
misfortune of dying on his excursion.
Finally, supporters claim that Chris was not liable for the river rising. This is also one of the contributing reasons why he died, because he cannot return home, and he needed this route to bring him back to civilization.
Chris McCandless was over confident in himself and his capabilities, along with being ill prepared for his journey. Considering the climate and other factors, Chris was not properly prepared for going in to the Alaskan wilderness. Along with his admirable traits, “his ignorance which could have been cured by a uses quadrant and boy scout manual, was what killed him” (72). Chris McCandless was given many things from his hitchhiking friends, because people saw that he was not prepared. Now, how can someone tramp into the wilderness and survive without basic supplies? Chris McCandless did not listen to many people, and in the end he paid for it. Next, Chris McCandless had insufficient
provisions and equipment. Told by many people are worried about him, “he lacked certain pieces of equipment deemed essential by many Alaskans; a large caliber rifle, map, and a compass” (180). A major part of survival is eating food that will keep one warm and provide energy. The gun Chris had was not able to hunt these large animals, and without fuel he cannot carry out his every day tasks that he needed to fulfill for survival. This further argues he was mostly responsible because it was his decision to not prepare himself for the challenges he will face in the future. Furthermore, Chris also set the bar for himself too high, and he cold not keep up. John Krakauer states that “[Chris] demanded too much of himself – more, in the end then he could deliver” (184). Chris McCandless thought of himself to superior to others than what he really was. He should have mentally and physically prepared himself more because when he pushed himself to the limit, it was catastrophic. He is responsible for this because he should have studied more and learned about what he would be expecting in the wilderness, and to be prepared for the worst. Chris McCandless was not aware of the wilderness’ dangerousness and he lacks quality friendships. In his college years, Chris did not have strong friendships to help him through college and years to come. According to Krakauer, “A professor gave him a key for after-hours to access the library, where he spent much of his free time” (124). Chris is responsible in this aspect because if he had more of a social life he would not be as lonely, and perhaps preventing him from going on his excursion in the first place. In college, people meet a lot of new people, and surrounding themselves with good people is a huge part. If Chris would have done this, he would not be so self-centered; and this is ultimately his fault for not opening up and spreading his wings. Next, Chris believes that he was next to invincible. Walt, Chris's father, states that “Chris was fearless, he didn’t think the odds applied to him” (109). Chris took many chances in his life ever since his childhood. Is taking risks good? This questions’ answer differs with people, but Chris’s risks were too great to be taken. He did not understand the effects of his actions, and thus he is responsible for not limiting himself to what he is capable to. Finally, Chris was unaware of a plants’ toxicity. Ron Hamilton states that the plant that ultimately killed McCandless is “H.alpiumum seeds are poisonous, and that an amino acid, is a toxic constituent” (212). The leading factor of his death is H.alpiumum seeds, and the seeds made him starve and not be able to gather food due to their strong power to disable a person temporarily and make them weak. This is his fault because he should have researched more about the plants and the difference between edible and poisonous. In this case, he should have done more research to discover that the seeds were poisonous and he could still be alive. Who enters the wilderness not knowing the difference between a poisonous plant and an edible plant?
...ng a fire, and purifying water. He may not have mastered the skills, but he was experienced enough to get by. In order to see that Chris was prepared, you have to look past the gear that he packed. You have to go through his mental process and you also have to look at what he learned in order to live off the land. Had he not been prepared, he would have most likely died after he ran out of rice.
Some mistakes can be recovered from and some are deemed fatal. Aron recovered from his with a huge price to pay, his arm. Chris made several simple mistakes that lead up to his death. One of Chris' mistakes was taking all his information to survive from one source, his plant identification book. On July 30 McCandless wrote in his journal "EXTREMELY WEAK. FAULT OF POT. SEED". (Krakauer 190) Krakauer went on to show that McCandless probably died from eating not poisonous but contaminated potato seeds. Therefore Chris did not intentionally cause his demise.
Krakauer explains this by showing us his final postcard (133-134). He says “When the adventure did indeed prove fatal, this melodramatic declaration fueled considerable speculation that the boy had been bent on suicide from the beginning, that when he walked into the bush, he had no intention of ever walking out again...My suspicion that McCandless’s death was unplanned…” (Krakauer 134). Krakauer tells us a bit later in the book, “Satisfied, apparently, with what he had learned during his two months of solitary life in the wild, McCandless decided to return to civilization...maybe he was prepared to forgive their imperfections...McCandless seemed ready, perhaps, to go home..There is no question however, that he intended to walk out of the bush” (169-169). Most people, unknowing of that post card would claim he is suicidal, but Chris, in his own words said that if it should prove fatal, the way he writes this isn’t how someone would be writing a goodbye note, this is someone who intends to come back out and see all of their friends that they’ve made during their journey. Chris even managed to begin the journey home, only to be set back by nature itself which tells us that he wanted to leave the wilderness and return to some semblance of civilization whether it be back in Carthage, or back home with his
In 1992, Christopher McCandless set off on an odyssey into the backcountry of Alaska, an adventure that had proved fatal. After McCandless's corpse was found, Jon Krakauer wrote an article on the story of Chris McCandless, which was released in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. The article had received a negative response; several readers criticized McCandless for being foolish and ill-prepared, and showed no sympathy or remorse for his death. McCandless has been referred to as a nut, a kook, and a fool. However, McCandless was not a nonsensical man. In 1996, Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, was published. The novel uncovers more detail of McCandless's story. Into the Wild rebuts the idea of McCandless being someone who is foolish, and speaks of the many occasions where McCandless has demonstrated great perseverance and determination. The novel also proves the intelligence of McCandless, and brings insight into McCandless's psyche. The following examples will illustrate how McCandless was not a fool, but someone to admire.
Was Chris McCandless deranged? Was he delusional? Or was he a hero? Since Chris’ body was found in bus 142 in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness, he has been called many things. Those who knew him believed that he wasn’t crazy; that his impulsive actions and aspirations to explore the world, were no more than the natural inclinations of a young and idealistic spirit. However, his desire to venture into the unknown with no source of human contact and nothing but a ten-pound bag of rice, is not considered normal behavior. Jon Kraukauer’s, Into The Wild, manifests how Chris McCandless’ antisocial demeanor, lack of remorse, and impulsive actions are directly relatable to behaviors associated with a sociopath.
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
Into the Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, is the story of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandless who ventured off to Alaska and tried to survive in the wild. McCandless grew up in Annandale, Virginia where he attended school and made very good grades, rarely bringing home anything below an A. His father, Walt worked for NASA for a little while, before starting his own business with Chris’s mother, Billie, out of their own home. They worked hard and for long hours to get the business up and running and it finally paid off. The McCandless family was wealthy, but had many emotional problems. After graduating from Emory University in 1990, Chris McCandless donated twenty-four thousand dollars from his savings account to charity, changed his name to Alexander Supertramp, and then disappeared. This book tells the story of his life and travels. Some critics say that Chris McCandless was a very admirable person. He was a brave man that followed his dreams. However, given all of his flaws, attitudes, and actions, he is un-admirable. McCandless walked into the wild very unprepared and stubborn. He also treated his family poorly as well as anyone who got emotionally close to him. Chris was additionally too impressionable in a way that he admired authors along with the books they wrote, and tried to imitate them. He was very rebellious in his actions as well, and did not try to change the world or help others.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
Was he a reckless idiot? That is the big question. This is what people always seem to talk about when they talk about Chris McCandless. There are many people who think that Chris McCandless was a reckless idiot who was mentally ill, or something else was wrong with Chris. It seems that almost everybody that met Chris thought maybe Chris was crazy or had problems. Here are just a few things that people said about Chris and his state of mind. Pg 40 Zarza admits saying, "he was always going on about trees and nature and weird stuff like that. We all thought he was missing a few screws. Pg 42 Charlie said, "seemed like a kid who was looking for something." Pg 45 Burres said "I thought Alex had lost his mind when he told us about his 'great Alaskan odyssey, ' as he called it."
He could 've even kept the money and go into town and what not to buy some food incase he couldn 't hunt anymore. I say that it is very ironic since Chris McCandless had donated all of his money to the hungry, and burned some of it too, yet he had died from starvation instead of keeping it and buying the food. A good example to why Chris did not use common sense is from Jessica Duling and she states “Chris McCandless was unprepared in more ways than one”, “why would anyone intending to live off the land for a few months, forget Boy Scout rule number one: Be Prepared”. I strongly agree with Jessica because the only thing that chris did to learn on how to live in the wild was buy a book on different types of plants and which ones are poisonous and which ones are not. I believe that if Chris had used a little common sense he would 've at least told his parents or brought a map or maybe look up how Alaska acts during the winter through the summer and maybe he might still be living till this
Chris McCandless was still just a young man when he decided to drastically alter his life through the form of a child’s foolishness. However, Chris had not known at the time just how powerful his testimony against his father’s authority, society, or maybe even his own lifestyle was going to be revolutionary throughout not only Alaska,not even the lower 48, but the world. The story of Chris McCandless is a much talked about debate on topics of safety and preparedness in the wild, these things forever associated with the boy who was a little too eager for a death wish. Today, Chris is remember as a fool or a hero. The fool, a boy who allowed himself to be drowned in a fictional world inspired by his readings,dying because he ignored he was just a normal human being or the hero who set out to become something more.
The novel “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer goes into great detail to describe the main character, Chris McCandless, who died traveling alone into the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless, whom in the novel renamed himself Alex, left his home and family to travel to Alaska in 1992. In Alaska McCandless planned to live an isolated life in the desolate wilderness, but unfortunately he did not survive. This non-fiction novel portrays his life leading up to his departure and it captures the true essence of what it means to be “in the wild”.
All in all, it is interesting how the trials of life can lead a person into an awakening that inspires millions. Many people believe that walking “into the wild” to live off the land and find himself alone in nature was arrogant, foolish and irresponsible. Chris lacks of knowledge about the wild was a major factor in his death. Chris did not plan how he will survive in the wilderness without proper equipments. He misunderstood that he would have no problem in setting in the wild. Chris immature manner and decisions lead him to starvation and ultimately death. If he planned it out in the beginning he would have saved his life.
Because of McCandless characteristics, he was able to carry on to his journey living the “Alaskan Dream”(...). First and foremost Chris McCandless was a determined young man. In his teen years he was always set on being in the wild. He had the fantasy of going to Alaska and living out of his backpack. He never really gave up on it. In the story people who were with him always knew that he wanted to go. In car rides he would always talk
This was not the kind of young man most people would expect especially coming from the upper class family that Chris did. He always wrote to the people he met along his way to Alaska just to reassure them of his well being and that he is still on his way to completing his ever so sought after journey. He cared about everyone he met along his voyage and they all cared about him. He valued and appreciated everything they done for him he always told them in his letters. Without these people he never would have made it to Alaska. Another time he showed he cherished in what he believed in was how would not let life be handed to him, that is the way he was brought up and raised. Chris being a bigger man than that knew every man, woman and child should be treated. That is one of the main reasons why he chose to change his socio economic status. Lastly Chris never had the same values as his old friends did. At a party one night he was with his “friends” when he then left the party without telling them and went over to the “sketchy” part of town. The part he went to was known for having prostitutes, homeless people, and drug dealers. Chris would then proceed to offer them a meal and would take them to restaurants and attempt to persuade these people into a better life. He cared for these people, did not know them but knew they were struggling he was willing to help and be there