Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay about human nature
A essay about human nature
A essay about human nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others. McCandless’s family and peers expect him to live life a certain way, to follow the family tradition, however, it is McCandless’s high social standards for himself, and his sharp view of right and wrong, that would define the blueprint of his tragic flaw that caused him to go into the wild. In High School, McCandless would start to show some of his radical ideas about how he could help fix society. McCandless’s high school buddies explained that “’ Chris didn’t like going through channels, working within the system.”’ (113) Instead, McCandless would often talk about leaving school to go South Africa to help end the apartheid. When his friends or adults responded by saying that you are only kids, or you can’t make a difference, McCandless would simply respond “so I guess you just don’t care about right and wrong ‘” (113). McCandless would grow to learn that hi... ... middle of paper ... ...fe for oneself. McCandless primary tragic flaw being his unwillingness to form long-term relations brought him both to the happiest moment of his life, but also to his demise. McCandless never had a problem with people, but rather with the status quo of society, the idea that a man or a woman has to live inside of a coordinate plane. McCandless left home and went on his adventure simply for his own well being, he achieved both what he wanted to accomplish while learning a valuable lesson along the way. He learned that happiness must be shared, and while everyone has his or her flaws, it is important to let these go. Christopher McCandless should teach people the importance of following your dreams, and the importance of enjoying the natural serenity of life. Works Cited Krakauer, Jon. Into the Wild. Anchor Books ed. Villard, NY: Random House, 1997. Print.
In 1992, Christopher McCandless set off on an odyssey into the backcountry of Alaska, an adventure that had proved fatal. After McCandless's corpse was found, Jon Krakauer wrote an article on the story of Chris McCandless, which was released in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. The article had received a negative response; several readers criticized McCandless for being foolish and ill-prepared, and showed no sympathy or remorse for his death. McCandless has been referred to as a nut, a kook, and a fool. However, McCandless was not a nonsensical man. In 1996, Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, was published. The novel uncovers more detail of McCandless's story. Into the Wild rebuts the idea of McCandless being someone who is foolish, and speaks of the many occasions where McCandless has demonstrated great perseverance and determination. The novel also proves the intelligence of McCandless, and brings insight into McCandless's psyche. The following examples will illustrate how McCandless was not a fool, but someone to admire.
Through his use of special organization, factual accounts and complex syntax, he is able to display McCandless as a person who was living the life that he wanted to live. He was kind and respectful to the people he met along the way, even helping them through their own hardships at times. This is the type person that Krakauer wanted to paint a picture of. He wanted to make sure that people did not see McCandless as the “nut” who did himself in. To make sure that the McCandless family could be proud of their son for being brave and doing what many would be too scared to attempt even if they wanted to. By writing this novel with the impressive rhetoric that he did, Krakauer was able to defend the actions of the late Chris McCandless and paint him as the bright young man that he
In what could have been Chris McCandless’s last contact with humanity he tells his new comrade, Wayne Westerberg, “If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t hear from me again I want you to know you are a great man. I now walk into the wild” (Krakauer 3). For 112 days Chris lived off the harsh Alaskan land. For anyone who is brave enough to travel on the stampede trail and cross the treacherous Teklanika River you will come across the Fairbanks City Transit System Bus 142. Once a backcountry shelter for hunters, trappers, ranger patrols, and for a short time Chris McCandless, Bus 142 now serves as a memorial for Chris McCandless. Travelers will make the trip to witness the basic resources Chris had at hand and the courage it took to make it as far as he did into his journey. Chris was not unaware of the dangers of the Alaskan wilderness. He was fully informed of the challenges he would face and was confident, maybe even hubristic, that he could overcome them. Non Supporters would argue this makes Chris a fool, reckless, brash, or even border lined unintelligent while in fact it is quite the opposite. Chris was a hero because he knew his differences and embraced them, his ambition and strive for perfection took his life, and he followed his dreams no matter the cost.
Life is a form of progress- from one stage to another, from one responsibility to another. Studying, getting good grades, and starting the family are common expectations of human life. In the novel Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer introduced the tragic story of Christopher Johnson McCandless. After graduating from Emory University, McCandless sold of his possessions and ultimately became a wanderer. He hitchhiked to Alaska and walked into the wilderness for nearly 4 months. This journey to the 49th state proved fatal for him, and he lost his life while fulfilling his dream. After reading this novel, some readers admired the boy for his courage and noble ideas, while others fulminated that he was an idiot who perished out of arrogance and
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
One with an intimate relationship with their family likely views McCandless as narrow minded and selfish. The intelligence, courage, and ambition of McCandless are often overlooked. McCandless, referred to as the “teenage Tolstoyan” (115), always displayed interest in entrepreneurship, but most importantly, McCandless always loved traveling, making solo endeavors as a teen. Thus, McCandless possessed enough intrepidity to embark on his journey. His only companions being rice, books, and clothing, McCandless was able to reach the sequestered Alaskan wilderness. It takes great courage to embark on a great journey with a small chance of success. A risk taken with good intentions resulted in an irrevocable adversity. Despite all of the calamities encountered, McCandless withstood the treacherous wilderness with great
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
Chris McCandless was born in a beautiful but very ugly situation. He was fortunate enough to be born in a fairly wealthy family with the vacations and cars, but during his childhood, he experienced the mistreatment of his mom and the situation that his dad put him and his siblings in.In Into the Wild,Jon Krakauer characterizes Christopher McCandless as independent and rebellious.
In 1976, Jon Krakauer ventured out into the Alaskan bush in an attempt to survive on his own with no human connection. This trip was in an attempt to seek refuge and peace in nature after his crazy college experiences. 1976 was the year that Jon Krakauer turned twenty-two. Chris McCandless was only two years older when he began his Alaskan trek. Chris had also went without any human connection after he began his Alaskan journey. Chris, similar to Jon, left on his adventure soon after leaving the busy college life and was partially seeking refuge from his controlling parents. McCandless and Krakauer also share similar personality traits. Krakauer has been described as a personal with only a few personal friends (About Jon Krakauer). Into the Wild depicts McCandless as a very personal person only making personal connections with his family members and a few random hitchhiking friends. Both McCandless and Krakauer have claimed to find solace in the arms of plain, undisturbed nature. Therefore, in the sense of their intricate pasts and personalities, Jon Krakauer and Christopher McCandless have several things in
In the movie “Into the Wild”, Christopher McCandless traveled around, not a permanent part of society. Even though he had the dream of surviving in Alaska, McCandless did not envision that it would be his final resting point. I was asked to write an essay about my opinion of whether or not that since it seems as though Christopher McCandless discovered the value of relationships, would he return to society, had he survived his Alaskan expedition. In my opinion, Christopher McCandless had always known the value of friendship, and that he would not return to become a member of society, if he had survived, McCandless formed many meaningful relationships before he made it to Alaska, McCandless had a great opportunity to become a part of society before he made his journey, McCandless never showed any signs of wanting to return to become a part of society throughout his journey.
McCandless grows up in the wealthy Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., and is a very gifted athlete and a scholar. After graduating from high school, McCandless spends the summer alone on a road trip across the country.When Chris McCandless discovered that his father secretly had a second family, he took a lot of despair with him. Chris was hypersensitive and was unable to handle what he had to go through. His way of dealing with this was to take part of a long tradition to seek him. To go to such an extent is heroic because McCandless gave up everything to search for value in himself. It takes bravery and courage to leave home to explore one’s purpose and to also find happiness.
He viewed the ideals he held as possible and became frustrated when others didn’t see the way he saw things. McCandless involved himself directly with matters around the world in his high school years and felt that the world could have been better. He, “became obsessed with racial oppression in South Africa.” in his senior year of high school (113). McCandless felt that the injustices of the world could and should be fixed, if not by others than by himself. To him an ideal world was a very real and possible thing to obtain if just enough people tried. Trying to achieve this he called on his friends to join, “ the struggle to end apartheid” in South Africa(113). Despite the seemingly fanciful ideals McCandless held towards the real world he actually acted out on his ideals in multiple occasions. He felt that the corruption and decay of society could be fixed and that he would be the one to do it. Going out on weekends, McCandless would go to one of the run down neighborhoods and would chat, “with prostitutes and homeless people, buying them meals, earnestly suggesting ways they might improve their lives”(113). To McCandless these people were not the scum of society, but rather people that should be aided and he would be the instrument of that. He truly believed that by interacting with them he could
In the film he showed us his struggles, his fears, and his values. On his two-year journey to Alaska he took risks and said words that came from his heart and stuck to his mind. If more people did what Chris McCandless did and took some time to find themselves, people would be more happier, peaceful, and just not take life for granted. McCandless will always have critics but people who think like him will always find him inspiring. As Chris says “The very basic core of a man's living spirit is his passion for adventure. The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon for each day to have a new and different sun.” This is a quote people should follow, we should try new things everyday and not do the same things and .fulfill a happy life with others or just yourself just like Chris
McCandless is convinced that his relationship with nature is more profound and honest than that of his relationship with people. Krakauer deduces that McCandless’s decision to be a vagabond is due to the “threat of human intimacy, of friendship, and all the messy emotional baggage that comes with it” (Krakauer 55). McCandless’s fear of “human intimacy” and “friendship” unravel his true purpose of escaping civilization, which is to break away from burdening others by his imperfections. McCandless presumes that nature would provide him reassurance because it does not doubt his choices and require him to explain himself for any of his actions. Due to this misconception, McCandless has misled himself into thinking that he is refraining others from