Who Is To Blame For Romeo's Death

555 Words2 Pages

In the conflict between Romeo Montague and Tybalt Capulet, I, Tvisha Sardesai, argue that Romeo should not be held solely responsible for Tybalt's death. Tybalt, a Capulet, had initially challenged Romeo, a Montague, to a duel, which Romeo had refused. However, when Romeo learned that Tybalt had killed his friend Mercutio, he sought revenge and engaged in the duel. While Romeo ultimately killed Tybalt, a closer examination of the events leading up to the conflict reveals that Tybalt's aggressive behavior, the longstanding family feud, and Romeo's desire for revenge following Mercutio's death all contributed to the tragic outcome. Therefore, it is unfair to place sole blame on Romeo and charge him with first-degree murder, which could lead to his exile from Verona. Some might argue that Romeo sparked the conflict by attending the Capulet party, but eyewitness Benvolio testified that Romeo did nothing to provoke Tybalt. In fact, Lord Capulet had given Romeo permission to attend the party, and Tybalt was the one who displayed aggressive behavior towards him. Romeo is known for his virtuous and lawful nature, as Lord Capulet himself acknowledged, saying that Verona …show more content…

Despite this, Romeo showed his virtuous nature by not wanting to engage in the fight. However, Romeo's friend Mercutio was killed by Tybalt, leading Romeo to avenge his death. It's important to note that Romeo never intended to kill Tybalt, which contradicts the charge of first-degree murder. In contrast, Tybalt's intent was clear when he killed Mercutio, as he sought to prove his skills while being mocked. Additionally, Tybalt's hatred towards the Montagues was evident when he said, "As I hate hell, all Montagues and thee" (Shakespeare I.i.67) to Benvolio, showing his malevolent intentions towards Romeo. If Mercutio hadn't intervened, Tybalt may have intended to kill Romeo as

Open Document