Who Is To Blame For Romeo And Juliet's Death

607 Words2 Pages

Romeo and Juliet. The classic and most well known story of true love. However, most true love is nothing but tragedy in the end, as it was in this story. In the end, both lovers die from their own hands. Many people agree it is not their fault for their deaths. After all, can you blame a leaf for falling from a tree when it’s branch is withering and forces that are as strong as gravity or are pulling it down? You can’t blame a suicidal person for their death, especially when they lose the love of their life. The real culprit in this case, is none other than Juliet’s cousin Tybalt. For numerous reasons, such as, his hatred for Romeo from the beginning and his known hot temper and prideful arrogance.

The first reason Tybalt is to blame for the murder of Juliet, is his premeditated hate for all Montagues, and especially Romeo. Tybalt’s hate for Romeo began when Romeo snuck into the ball and Tybalt found out. This intertwined with the fact that Tybalt already hated Montagues led to a deep rooted contempt for Romeo. All these factors eventually led to Tybalt murdering Romeo’s best friend, Mercutio. Then Tybalt got what he wanted, a fight to the death …show more content…

Tybalt was known to be a hothead. If he hadn’t grown to the point of anger where he disobeyed Lord Capulet’s orders, he may have prevented five deaths. When Tybalt let his anger get the best of him and he slayed Mercutio, Romeo retaliated over the death of his best friend. As punishment for this act, Romeo was banished, and Juliet was distraught. Leading to the potion Juliet took to prevent her marriage with Paris, the poison Romeo took to die with her, and the dagger Juliet plunged into her heart. If Tybalt wouldn’t have started these arguments or been so prideful, he wouldn’t have killed Mercutio, he would still be alive himself, Paris would not have died, Romeo would not have drank the poison, and therefore Juliet would not be

Open Document