Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies ralph character analysis
Ethics in lord of the flies
Character development of lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies ralph character analysis
Imagine a life that is detached from civilization and free from any socially imposed morals. In the story Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young boys is faced with this situation, and there is a perpetual conflict between the boys who are trying to maintain order and those whose violent instincts take over. Despite Ralph’s efforts to maintain order on the island and get the boys rescued, the boys, including Ralph himself, resort to violent and primitive behavior, and this is what causes Simon’s death. Whereas the other boys on the island lose their moral principles once savagery takes over, Simon retains his morals and does nice things such as helping the younger boys find food. In Lord of the Flies, Simon represents the speck of intrinsic morality and perceptive reasoning on the island, and unlike the other boys, he demonstrates morality as a way of life rather than a socially-imposed concept that is to be quickly lost in the wake of uncertainty. …show more content…
To begin, Simon did things to help all of the other boys on the island.
One example of this occurred when Ralph had plans to build huts for shelter. Ralph was irritated that none of the other boys were helping to build the shelter, but even though the other boys did whatever they wanted to do on a whim, Simon stayed around and helped Ralph with whatever needed to be done. When Ralph was talking to Piggy one day, he said, “‘Simon. He helps’…‘All the rest rushed off. He’s done as much as I have’” (54). Ralph’s statement here specifically shows how the majority of the boys are only self-interested, but Simon is interested in helping the group in any way that he can. Later, Simon also helps some of the little boys find fruit, which no one else had done. These actions from Simon show that he is willing to do good things even though he does not have to. In contrast with the other boys whose moral principles had quickly decayed, Simon continued to do good things because it was in his nature to do
so. In addition, Simon knew things that the other boys did not know. Simon said, “‘Maybe there is a beast’…‘What I mean is…maybe it’s only us’” (89). He went on to describe “Mankind’s essential illness,” but he had a hard time describing it to the other boys. Since Simon took time on the island to carefully examine his surroundings, he was able to realize the savagery that was taking over the other boys. He realized that the boys themselves were the single most destructive force on the island. This realization is continued later when Simon discovers the dead parachutist on the island that the other boys thought was a beast. Although Simon dies before he can provide most of this insight to the other boys, he knows the truth in the end, and it is what he expected all along. Finally, Simon’s perpetual goodness is emphasized by his description after he dies. He was described in a tremendous amount of detail, and the description made him appear to be at peace with the world. At the end of the description, it is described that “Softly, surrounded by a fringe of inquisitive bright creatures, itself a silver shape beneath the steadfast constellations, Simon’s dead body moved out toward the open sea” (154). Simon is described in a peaceful way to represent his satisfaction in life even though it was cut short. Despite his tragic death, Simon made morality a way of life, and this made his life meaningful so that he was happy with the life he had lived in the end. Ultimately, Simon was one of multiple brutal casualties caused by a rudimentary civilization of boys that lacked order and moral principles. Simon helped the boys when he did not have to, and he knew things that the other boys refused to realize because of their decline to savagery.
One reason Simon is regarded as the Christ figure in Lord of the Flies is that he commits many selfless acts just like Jesus Christ did. Simon chooses to stay and help Ralph build huts rather than go play with the other inhabitants. Ralph compliments Simon by saying “Simon. He Helps. All the rest rushed off. He’s done as much as I have” (54). Golding also illustrates Simon’s generosity when “Simon pulled off the choicest fr...
A group of kids got stuck on an island after their plane got shot down and they all have many different personalities. Being stuck on an island usually brings out the worst of people.But, there were two characters in novel, “The Lord of The Flies” that had good morals. These two characters were Ralph and Simon. Ralph and Simon weren’t intimidated by not having any adults around, instead, they tried to bring out the best of themselves and not take part in any horseplay the rest of the boys did.
In the novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the concept of good fighting evil is clearly shown to be a big picture. In many cases, Jesus Christ represents good and bliss in the universe, while the devil represents evil. In this novel the reader sees the when good fights evil, the evil is a good turned evil. For example, before the devil became evil, he was an angel. He was good turned evil and is now fighting good. Simon represents the good and bliss, he is the Christ figure on the island while evil and savagery is shown in the other boys on the island. Both Simon and Christ share common qualities, actions, and deaths. Simon shows this throughout the novel, from the beginning until the time of his death.
As Jack hunts his “frustration seemed bolting and nearly mad” which shines in his slowly deranging eyes (Golding 67). In Lord Of The Flies by William Golding, stranded boys struggle to find order and civilization on an island with no other humans. After their plane crash lands, a few boys, such as Ralph and Piggy, are quick to set up standard rules. But, not everyone agrees that rules and rescue are what is most important. Jack, a boy who cares more about hunting, disrupts the goodness and order that remains in the boys. When a simulated hunting influenced and led by Jack goes awry, the boys kill Simon. The now deceased Simon is the purest and kindest of the boys. Jack leads the elimination of the only good left on their island. Whether it is his intention to kill him or not, Jack should be held responsible for Simon’s demise because he leads the group to kill him, regardless of his age.
Simon was the observant character, the quiet philosopher. He was often alone, sometimes by his own choice, and he liked to wander into the peaceful jungle. He sincerely cared about the other boys, sometimes helping the young ones to fetch fruit, yet "Simon turned away from them and went where the just perceptible path led him. Soon high jungle closed in" (56). He loved solitude and yet felt loneliness; he was alien to the other boys. The boys did not think anyone would be stupid enough to go into the jungle by night: "The assembly grinned at the thought of going out into the darkness. Then Simon stood up and Ralph looked at him in astonishment" (85). Many of the boys even thought he was "batty" because he left the group to spend time alone.
While Jack and Ralph represent the distinct polarization between civilization and savagery. Simon is separated from both of these dimensions. Simon represents built-in goodness. The other boys who hold on to their sense of morality only do so because society has conditioned and trained them to act in a certain way. They do not have an innate sense of morality. Unlike the other boys on the island, Simon does not act morally because an external force has compelled him to do so, instead he finds value in performing good actions.
In literature, as in life, people struggle with the principles and beliefs they hold. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, Ralph represents order, civilization, and leadership. On the island, Ralph is conflicted with his principles and beliefs that he has acquired over the years of living in a civilized and humane world and is caught between holding on to them or submitting to the barbarism that seems to have taken over the other boys.
Inherent Evil of Man Exposed in Lord of the Flies & nbsp; The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding used a group of British boys beached on a deserted island to illustrate the malicious nature of mankind. Lord of the Flies dealt with the changes the boys underwent as they gradually adapted to the freedom of their society. William Golding's basic philosophy that man was inherently evil was expressed in such instances as the death of Simon, the beast within the boys, and the way Ralph was fervently hunted. & nbsp; Through the story, Simon acted as the Christ Figure. The death of Simon symbolized the loss of religious reasoning.
In the end, even though he failed to inform the other boys of it, Simon through his use of spiritual power was able to recognize the truth. He stood strong against evil even though it consumed the island after his death. People can look to him as an example of how to act in real life. And to be honest, Simon is an important character to Lord of the Flies by William Golding, not just for all this, but because he is what every person should wish to be. In the book the others bully him because they do not quite understand him, but Simon in all reality is a role model for the world. Don’t you think that the world would be a much better place, if we all tried to act a little bit like Simon?
In The Lord of the Flies, the morality of apparently civilized boys gradually seems to vanish in direct relation to the amount of time that they are separated from society. They never understood why they had behaved themselves before they were stranded on the island. They only repeated the moral systems of their parents just as any other perfunctory gesture. As soon as they are on their own, they begin to do what is easiest rather than what is "proper." This concept is not far from what the reaction to any person would be in this situation. If someone found that suddenly he were not longer responsible to anyone, his life would greatly change from the way it was before. People do many things to please family and friends. People only do what is expected. If moral behavior is no longer expected, it will stop being practiced.
he has a friendly aura about him that is recognised by Ralf as soon as
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding expresses the idea that humans are naturally immoral, and that people are moral only because of the pressures of civilization. He does this by writing about a group of boys, and their story of survival on an island. The civilized society they form quickly deteriorates into a savage tribe, showing that away from civilization and adults, the boys quickly deteriorate into the state man was millions of years ago. This tendency is shown most in Jack, who has an animalistic love of power, and Roger, who loves to kill for pleasure. Even the most civilized boys, Ralph and Piggy, show that they have a savage side too as they watch Simon get murdered without trying to save him. Simon, the only one who seems to have a truly good spirit, is killed, symbolizing how rare truly good people are, and how quickly those personalities become corrupted.
Simon is not the only one to demonstrate selflessness in the book. Ralph is the shows his kindness and goodness at the very beginning of the book. As leader, he desires for all of the boys to be safely rescued and for them to be taken care of. "If this isn't an island we might get rescued straight away…everyone must stay around here and wait and not go away." (p. 22) He starts out with the best intentions in mind, and wants to have the best for everyone. As the novel continues, and evil intensifies, Ralph won't participate in the wickedness of others. He keeps away from evil by having quiet times by himself and keeping his goal, to be rescued, in front of himself.
A segment of what this Lord of the Flies ‘says’ on page 143, “You knew didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s a no go? Why things are the way they are?” The Lord of the Flies, William Golding. This line perfectly represents the control the Lord of the Flies has over the boys, he is the ‘beast’ within the boys, the evil that controls their nature. These lines can be a bit confusing if they are overlooked or misunderstood as to their context in the text. It is important for the reader to know that the author’s stance is that humankind is inherently evil as is seen in the conflicts between the boys and the violence on the island. If this Lord of the Flies actually has the power over the boys that he claims he does, then this island is going down in flames, which happened on the first day of the island actually, perhaps this Lord of the Flies is the best leader of the boys after all, Ralph is seen as a popular figure; however, he cannot make the boys listen or do anything, at least this Lord of the Flies can do that much. This Lord of the Flies actually does some foreshadowing as well, which is a trait only Simon had before, he displays his power over the boys in saying, “I’m warning you. I’m going to get angry. D’you see? You’re not wanted.
Throughout William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, many of the characters go through changes in their personality traits. From beginning to end, Simon goes through the smallest amount of change than anyone in the novel. Despite the fact that Simon did not really fit in with the other boys, he tried his hardest to make a difference in his and the other's lives.