Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on sir thomas more
Thomas more on English society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short essay on sir thomas more
In his work of fiction Utopia, the humanist Catholic Thomas More depicts an island that may seem perfect in contrast to his homeland England. He writes about far fetched topics such as divorce, freedom of religion, and women’s rights. Utopia is considered a satirical work of political philosophy in that it critiques England’s society and the royal, political, and religious leaders of the Renaissance time period. Thomas More creatively incorporates real characters in his story such as his friend Peter Giles and even himself. However, Thomas More develops the fictional character Raphael Hythloday by using his name and appearance, indirect characterization, and his dialogue to mask his criticism to England and to show that the seemingly perfect Utopia does not exist. The story includes real characters and real places but it is not until the made up character Raphael Hythloday is introduced …show more content…
In Thomas More’s first encounter with Hythloday, he describes him as “a certain stranger, a man well stricken in age, with a black sun-burned face, a long beard, and a cloak cast homely about his shoulders , whom, by his favour and apparel, forthwith I judged to be a mariner”(More 11). Hythloday’s outward appearance is that of any sailor in that time; old, ruddy, casually dressed, and bearded. Hythloday has a humble appearance but Giles assures More that there is more than meets the eye about Hythloday. Giles tells More that Hythloday is a Portuguese native, impressively fluent in both Greek and Latin, who had the chance to sail around the world with the famous and historic explorer Amerigo Vespucci before he came upon and lived on the island Utopia. More’s depiction of Hythloday’s outward appearance does not match with Giles’s depiction of Hythloday’s experience and wisdom. This could be another hint to readers that Hythloday and his words should not be taken at face
Utopia is a term invented by Sir Thomas More in 1515. However, he traces the root two Greek words outopia and eutopia which means a place does not exist and a fantasy, invention. It is widely accepted that Plato was to first to picture a utopian order. In his masterpiece, “Republic”, he formed the principles of ideal commonsense and his utopia (Hertzler, 1922:7). After the classical age, Sir Thomas More assumed to be the first of the utopian writers in early modern period. As a humanist, he gave the world in his “Utopia” a vision of a perfect communistic commonwealth (the history of utopian thought). Utopia’s influence on contemporary and rival scholars is so deep that it has given its name to whole class of literature. Following the appearance of More’s Utopia, there was a lack of Utopian literature for nearly a century (Hertzler, 1922:7). This period ended with the works of Francis Bacon, Campanelle and Harrington. These early modern utopians, being the children of Renaissance, filled with a love of knowledge and high respect for the newly truths of science. Thus, they believed that the common attainment of knowledge means the largest participation of all members of society in its joys and benefits. After the period of early Utopians, continuation of a sprit of French Revolution and initial signs of industrial revolution resulted in the emergence of a new group of Utopians called Socialist Utopians (Hertzler, 1922: 181). The word “Socialism” seems to have been first used by one of the leading Utopian Socialists, St Simon. In politics utopia is a desire that never come true neither now nor afterwards, a wish that is not based on social forces (material conditions and production) and is not supported by the growth and development of political, class forces. This paper discusses the validity of this claim, tries to present and evaluate the political reforms, if any, offered by Socialist Utopians.
When reason permeates society, it does not necessarily imply greater happiness. When brought to the point of rationalization, or when there are errors in the analysis used in reasoning, reason tends to have adverse effects. On the other hand, when analysis is well thought out, and the correct conclusions are drawn, reason can have an overwhelmingly positive effect on a society. Many may think that Sir Thomas More's Utopia infers that reason must be the foundation, and even the preoccupation, of any perfect society. In fact, according to Dr. Evans, More's contemporaries had no doubt that More was attempting to depict a perfect society, one firmly based upon the precepts of reason. However, More injects several major flaws in the Utopian system, which subverts the possibility of that society being truly ideal. In his attempt to expose the inherent limitations of reason, More presents us with the Utopian society, which both benefits and loses from reason in their handling of material wealth, religious toleration, and respect for human life.
Although everyone knows that the world is not perfect as is, several philosophers have iterated their ideas of what a perfect and ideal society, a utopia, would look like. Some such philosophers were Thomas More in 1516 through his fictional book, Utopia, and Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848 through their pamphlet, The Communist Manifesto. In Utopia, three characters discuss Hythloday’s travels to the land of Utopia and why it is superior to other nations, while in The Communist Manifesto, the authors plan actions to overthrow the oppressive bourgeois class and create a classless society. Although Marx and Engels do not explicitly state that they seek a utopian society like More does, the description of the resulting society of their revolution meets the criteria of their own perfect society. Both works come about as a result of their political and social contexts at the time of authorship, with Utopia being a result of the feudal system in Europe
Thomas More’s Utopia and Aldus Huxley’s Brave New World , are novels about societies that differ from our own. Though the two authors have chosen different approaches to create an alternate society, both books have similarities which represent the visions of men who were moved to great indignation by the societies in which they lived. Both novels have transcended contemporary problems in society , they both have a structured, work based civilization and both have separated themselves from the ways of past society. It is important when reading these novels to focus on the differences as well as the similarities. The two novels differ in their views of love, religion, and the way to eliminate social classes. These differences seem to suggest that if we do not come closer to More’s goal in Utopia, we will end up in a society much like that of Huxley’s Brave New World.
More, Sir Thomas. Utopia: A New Translation, Backgrounds, Criticism. Ed. and trans. Robert M. Adams. Toronto: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1988.
He uses the characters to bring about points that went against common thought at the time. More does give some insight to his thoughts when he says, “When Raphael had finished his story, I was left thinking that not a few of the laws and customs he had described as existing among the Utopians were really absurd” (p. 106). More explains these things consisted of war, religion, and other smaller customs. More next says that “… my chief objection was to the basis of their whole system, that is, their communal living and moneyless economy” (p. 106). It is clear here that More was not completely for the Utopian society. He even goes as far as dismissing the communal practices which is the basis of the entire society in the first place. It makes sense since he was heavily involved in the Roman Catholic Church and an important figure. Much of Utopia goes completely against the norms that were set by 1516 in England. More also ends book II by stating, “Meantime, while I can hardly agree with everything he said… I freely confess that in the Utopian commonwealth there are very many features that in our own societies I would wish rather than expect to see” (p. 107). More is showing that even though he doesn’t agree with many of the aspects of Utopia, that it isn’t all bad. The only problem is that More poses the practices he likes with wishful thinking and not practicality. According to More,
Manchester believed that Thomas More rose above higher than any other humanist. He was devout to both his Catholic church, as well as to King Henry VIII (108). More’s Utopia was open to other religious views, but More’s persona was a devout Catholic. More’s texts presented humanistic ideas to Europeans, and opened doors in their minds to more humanistic beliefs.
Utopia itself is divided into two different books, the first half of the book talks about ‘the obligations of a man of experience and integrity to play an active role in the service of a country and mankind,’ Moore puts himself into his narrative meeting a traveler called Raphael Hythloday. Hythloday is described as wise and well-travelled however, this fictional character has cruised with ‘the famed explored Amergio Vespucci.’ Vespucci was seen as a fraud to Moore and other philosophers, therefore its unclear whether Raphael Hythloday is truly reliable or not. The second half of the of the book goes into Hythloday’s tr...
Critics of Thomas More’s Utopia are sometimes divided on the religious interpretation of the work. In other words, they question whether it supports Catholic or Protestant beliefs and ideals. Utopia was published a year before the Reformation in England which leads critics to dispute More’s intentions in regards to religion. More himself was a devout Catholic, but some of his claims about the Church and European society in Utopia’s book one could, to some critics, come across as satire. However, evidence from the work itself, particularly in the section in book two about the Utopians’ own religious practices, sheds light on the Catholic influence in the work as a whole. In Thomas More’s Utopia, the Utopian society is heavily influenced by
In essence, Utopia is a written manifestation of More’s humanist beliefs. Many of these views are vicariously present in the character of Raphael Hythloday. For example, Hythloday comments on the unwillingness of Kings to take advice from others, claiming they are “drenched as they are and infected with false values from boyhood and on” (More, 2011, p. 28). The idea of “infection” implies that a man is not naturally corrupt or sinful, but rather pure at heart and simply influenced by the environment an individual is exposed to. This is a key humanist concept, which suggests that human nature is malleable and inconstant, and therefore can be positively influenced to do good. Raphael later states, “Pride is too deeply fixed in human nature to be easily plucked out” (More, 2011, p. 98) Though this may seem contradictory to his previous statement, Hythloday still suggests that human nature can be changed, though he candidly admits that it is difficult. More is attempting to illustrate his own hesitations of serving the King through the conversation between the fictional More and Hythloday, which serves as a representation of More’s conflict between his beliefs as a humanist and a servant of the King.
To understand the relationship, the two books must be contextualized. An important part of contextualization is to understand the role of Plato in both the period of Humanism and, within that, in the life of Thomas More. On the one hand, More, like many of his counterparts of the period, "had enjoyed good humanist [education] and retained a powerful love of classical literature" (Rice 141). To further complicate matters, though, although he was a politician, he was also a devout Christian who "secretly wore a hairshirt until the day before he died" (Turner/More 14). More specifically, More was a devout Catholic who was executed because he refused to take an oath swearing loyalty to Henry VIII, after the split of the Church of England, over the pope. His religiosity makes some of the differences between the Republic and Utopia more understandable.
Utopia as a text is a clear reflection and representation of More’s passion for ideas and art. Through the character of Raphael, More projects and presents his ideas, concepts and beliefs of politics and society. More’s Utopia aims to create a statement on the operations and effectiveness of the society of England. This text is a general reflection of More’s idea of a perfectly balanced and harmonious society. His ideas and concepts of society somewhat contrast to the rest of 16th century England and indicate a mind that was far ahead of its time. A number of issues and themes are raised throughout the text to which More provides varying views and opinions. These are transmitted and projected through the perspectives of the fictional Raphael, More and Giles.
Thomas More presents in Utopia opinions of human nature that are far more positive than negative. More shows that human nature is affected by their environment, socially, politically and economically. It is inferred the Utopians believed in the betterment of humanity and human behavior is through the manipulation of the social environment. This could be seen in his lean towards compassion rather than ill-treatment when dealing with
Sir Tomas More’s Utopia indirectly criticizes fifteen hundredth European catholic society of corruption, violence, poverty and of inequality. As a lord chancellor to Henry VIII, Thomas More was well aware of these problems and wrote a satire to propose his awareness in a carful manner, as we can see his hesitation to publish the book on his letter to Peter Giles especially when he described his “two minds” (More, 8). To criticize the problems of his times on a safe platform, he created a fictional character Raphael Hythloday, who is wise and knowledgeable of new places from the sailing experience with Amerigo Vespucci. This not only reflects the times in which people stepped out their voyages to the New World but also provides a foil to the European society—the
That is until Sir Thomas More outlined the first Utopian society, coining the word and setting guidelines for how he imagined a realistic utopia to function. Deriving the word “Utopia” from the Greek ou-topos, which translates roughly to ‘no-place’ or ‘nowhere’, instead of drawing inspiration from a similar word eu-topos, meaning a ‘good place’ (Learning). This distinction signifies a potential initial belief that the creator the first world defined as utopia believed it to be something that could not or did not exist. Instead of naming it after the concept of “a good place”, he instead chose to derive utopia from an idea that implies it existed nowhere. Furthermore, More’s utopia was set in an island completely isolated from the rest of the world around it: comprised of 200 cities, each having an elected senate that are simply there in order to discuss potential change in the few regulations of the world.