Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jim Crow laws and their effects
Literature As A Reflection Of Society
Literature As A Reflection Of Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many groups within The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald are marginalized to establish the status and wealth of the main characters. Meyer Wolfsheim, people of color, and the lower class are all marginalized in different ways ranging from “othering” to Tom’s tyrannical control of the lower class. By marginalizing these groups, Fitzgerald reinforces the status and power of the main characters within the story based on their wealth, race, and ethnic background in a way that reflects upon 1920’s America. Marginalization based on ethnicity is shown when Wolfsheim is introduced into the story in chapter four. Gatsby describes Wolfsheim as a friend but the extent of their relationship is made clear by Wolfsheim’s description of Gatsby as, “the …show more content…
kind of man you’d like to take home and introduce to your mother and sister,” (Fitzgerald 72). Based on this positive relationship with Gatsby, it should be expected that Wolfsheim would be portrayed positively. Instead of the anticipated positive description, Wolfsheim is described as a terrifying criminal who Nick would like to avoid at all costs. Although Wolfsheim’s history of crime would explain Nick’s reluctance, this doesn’t explain why there are many examples of Wolfsheim being excluded based on his Jewish heritage. Wolfsheim’s heritage is almost solely emphasized using common racial stereotype about his nose. The first description of Wolfsheim is that he is,” A small, flat-nosed Jew,” (69). Although it can be argued that this is just a factual statement about his appearance, his nose is stated by Nick to have, “flashed at me indignantly,” (70) and as being a, “tragic nose,” (72). The emphasis on Wolfsheim’s nose in relation to his Jewish heritage is interwoven into his descriptions as a gambler and criminal. By emphasizing his Jewish heritage and his criminality Fitzgerald supports stereotypes that portray Jewish people as greedy and obsessed with financial success. By tying Wolfsheim’s criminality to his heritage, Gatsby becomes more acceptable and humanized even though it is known he engaged in many illegal activities. Nowhere in the novel are people of color given the opportunity to speak.
Although this shows that this social group was silenced, there are still a few minor incidents where people of colored are mentioned. The first incident occurs early in the first chapter of the book when Nick is at dinner with Tom and Daisy. During their discussion, Tom decides to express his thoughts on a book he had read which was titled “The Rise of the Colored Empires,” (12). Tom then goes on to state that, “Civilization’s going to pieces,” (12) and that, “we’re Nordics… and we’ve produced all the things that go to make civilization,” (13). Although Tom’s statements are blunt, they still show the inexcusable bias and lack of humility on behalf of the white characters. A subtler line within story occurs while Gatsby and Nick are on their way to meet Wolfsheim in chapter four. While driving, Nick observes that there is, “A limousine…driven by a white chauffeur, in which sat three modish negroes…the yolks of their eyeballs rolled toward us in haughty rivalry,” (69). These three people are obviously well off because of their ability to hire a driver, but despite this, they’re still described as being in, “haughty rivalry.” This perceived rivalry on Nick’s behalf shows that he and Gatsby are in a position of power which can only be contested through outward expressions of wealth. Furthermore, this description of people of color portrays people of color as lower in status than the white …show more content…
characters even though they’re also in a position of wealth. This perception of people of color as lower is confirmed by Nick when he states that, “Anything can happen now that we’ve slid over this bridge,” (69) because the mere act of seeing rich people of color is enough to evoke surprise. This description not only portrays people of color poorly, but it further cements that the main characters have more status because of their racial background. Finally, Tom’s relationship with the Myrtle and George Wilson demonstrates how the upper class can ignore and manipulate the lower-class because it is marginalized and excluded from positions power.
The lack of social power that the lower class possess is shown by Tom’s physical assault on Myrtle in chapter two. Throughout most of this chapter, Myrtle can hold power because of her relationship with Tom. After joining Nick and Tom, Myrtle changes into an expensive chiffon dress. After putting on this expensive symbol of status, “her assertions became more violently affected moment by moment, and as she expanded the room grew smaller around her,” (31). This increase in power is connected to status supplied by Tom in the form of the dress. In the same way that Tom can supply power, he is also able to take it away. With Tom’s consent Myrtle can express a large amount of social power, but when she tries to go against him it vanishes. In response to Myrtle’s comments about Daisy, it is stated that, “Tom Buchanan broke her nose with his open hand,” (37). Similarly, Tom can control George’s economic power by prolonging the delivery of cars to his garage. When Wilson attempts to question the wait, Tom simply replies that, “if you feel that way about it, maybe I’d better sell it somewhere else after all,” (25). Tom’s effectively has complete control over the Wilson family because they’ve been marginalized and removed from positions of power. Ultimately this treatment of
the lower class further contrasts the power and status of the wealthy characters making their differences seem incomparable. By separating Wolfsheim, people of color, and the poor from the main characters of the story, Fitzgerald can effectively determine status based upon ethnic background, race, and wealth. By marginalizing social groups that the main characters don’t belong to, Fitzgerald reinforces the status and power of the main characters in a way that is accurate to the setting of 1920’s America.
Myrtle Wilson came from a working class family with a low social standing. Due to her family’s lack of money, Myrtle’s options were limited to marrying men of equal or lower economic status than herself. As a result, Myrtle married George Wilson, a poor car mechanic. In her relationship with George, Myrtle lacked control due to her status as a woman and was thus forced to listen to her husband. However, because of her lower status, Myrtle did learn to use her physical attributes to her own advantage. In other words, Myrtle knew how to exaggerate her physical beauty in order to attract men such as Tom Buchanan; who would pay her with money and expensive gifts in return. Thus, “there is a clear connection between the material disadvantages” Myrtle faced and her lack of morals; given “the paucity of her allotment of the fundamental decencies” (Voegeli). In other words, because of her lack of economic backing, Myrtle Wilson grew up as a woman of lower class with less options in life; which limited her social power and drove her to act unlike any high class lady. Thus, Myrtle’s only option for increasing her status was through material services such as her relationship with Tom Buchanan. All in all, Myrtle Wilson’s economic status limited her to the life of a low class woman and her power others in her
Class Matters and the Great Gatsby both describe the differences between classes to show how unalike they are. Fitzgerald does this with color symbolism and his characters. He uses several colors as symbols to help him demonstrate the disparity in-between the economic classes. The East Egg homes are described as “white palaces.” The color white stands as a strong symbol of superiority and wealth (Bloom). Fitzgerald describes the valley of ashes as a dull, grey environment. Fitzgerald uses his characters to show the difference in social class. Tom Buchanans is a member of an incredibly wealthy family. Fitzgerald describes Tom as having “two shining arrogant eyes…and a voice full of contempt” (7). Meanwhile, Jay Gatsby, the novel’s protagonist, comes from an incredibly poor family and is described as having an aura of trust and understanding (48). Fitzgerald uses the two contrasting descriptions to show how T...
There are many themes that are implemented in the Great Gatsby that Fitzgerald uses as a technique to juxtapose two contrasting topics. During this time of the Roaring Twenties, business and economy was booming, however there’s still was a underlying hint of urban corruption and the gap between the rich and poor became greater. Through the technique of juxtaposition, Fitzgerald paints a detailed picture of society in the 1920’s and its cultural clashes. By comparing the characters living in the East and West Egg, Fitzgerald highlights the contrast between morality and corruption in society during the 1920’s. Additionally, his contrasting descriptions of Tom and Daisy’s house to the Valley of Ashes offers a juxtaposition of the rich and poor.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1922) involves some important social issues and anxieties, such as race and gender. Throughout the nine chapters, he uses his characters to deliver a message on how the effects of power and inequality coincide with the social norms of the twentieth century. In the text, the characters are involved in a love triangle that has been threaded together by deception and greed; and also, we have the perspective of an outsider, who is eventually entangled into an already unkempt situation. In reading, you would see that wearing a different face is common nature to these characters. However, Fitzgerald channeled both theatrics and facts through Nick Carraway and playfully executes the
The Great Gatsby “The Great Gatsby”, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, depicts the vast social difference between the old aristocrats, the new self-made rich and the poor. He vividly interprets the social stratification during the roaring twenties as each group has their own problems to deal with. Old Money, who have fortunes dating from the 19th century, have built up powerful and influential social connections, and tend to hide their wealth and superiority behind a veneer of civility. The New Money made their fortunes in the 1920s boom and therefore have no social connections and tend to overcompensate for this lack with lavish displays of wealth. As usual, the No Money gets overlooked by the struggle at the top, leaving them forgotten or ignored.
The novel is, interestingly, a favorite one of alleged murderer O.J. Simpson. Simpson confessed to having read it at least five times during his college years, and was often baffled when his team mates dismissed his interest in racial aspects of the novel. Blacks, he noted, are mentioned only twice. One of them is a witness at the fatal knife fight that occurs after one of Gatsby’s parties. The other was a witness to Myrtle’s death. Then, there is the offensively stereotyped description and language of the Mexican drug dealer, Wolfsheim (at least Profkiev, in his now classic essay, Underground: The Jewish/Mexican “Gonnegtions” in The Great Gatsby, saw the portrayal of Wolfsheim as a satire on political events of the time. Fitzgerald expressed amazement that so few readers realized this).
This essay discusses the role of social mobility in The Great Gatsby. It argues that not all people can reach the highest social class, this is a class you must belong to from the beginning of life or marry in to. However, the characters are living the American dream which makes social mobility to the other social classes available. The essay addresses the American Dream, the difference in social class between the main characters and how some social mobility is unreachable.
Throughout the novel The Great Gatsby, there is a constant theme present: social class. Fitzgerald makes a connection between the theme of social class, and the settings in the novel for example The Valley of Ashes which is described as a “desolate area of land” (p.21) and a “solemn dumping ground” (p.21) which is where the poor people live. The Valley of Ashes is situated between West Egg and New York, West Egg being the place where the aspiring classes are situated, which is the “less fashionable of the two” (p.8), this is where Gatsby lives. West Egg is the place of ‘new money’, Fitzgerald shows this by the idea of the main character Jay Gatsby, rumoured to be selling illegal alcohol (prohibition) which means he is quickly making vast amounts of money.” Who is this Gatsby anyhow? Some big bootlegger?”(p.86) Gatsby shows off the amount of wealth he has by his fabulous parties and oversized mansion. “There was music from my neighbour's house through those summer nights. In his enchanted gardens, men and girls came and went like moths, among the whispering and the champagne and the stars.”(p.33) Fitzgerald uses the word ‘enchanted’ to paint a visual picture of what the house and the scene looks like, a magical and enchanted castle, with elegant furniture. This is in comparison to East Egg where Tom and Daisy Buchanan live, in a house where “The windows were ajar and gleaming white against the fresh grass outside” (p.10). East Egg being the place of ‘old money’ which is made from the inheritance of their past generations, the people who live it East Egg are mainly well educated, historically wealthy and live quite elegantly, but they are also quite ‘snobbish’. Gatsby’s background does not fit into the social standards of East Egg...
The Great Gatsby is an American novel of hope and longing, and is one of the very few novels in which “American history finds its figurative form (Churchwell 292).” Gatsby’s “greatness” involves his idealism and optimism for the world, making him a dreamer of sorts. Yet, although the foreground of Fitzgerald’s novel is packed with the sophisticated lives of the rich and the vibrant colors of the Jazz Age, the background consists of the Meyer Wolfsheims, the Rosy Rosenthals, the Al Capones, and others in the vicious hunt for money and the easy life. Both worlds share the universal desire for the right “business gonnegtion,” and where the two worlds meet at the borders, these “gonnegtions” are continually negotiated and followed (James E. Miller). Gatsby was a character meant to fall at the hands of the man meant to be a reality check to the disillusions of the era.
Book Analysis F. Scott Fitzgerald, the author of "The Great Gatsby," reveals many principles about today's society and the "American dream. " One of the biggest fears in today's world is the fear of not fitting into society. People of all age groups and backgrounds share this fear. Many individuals believe that to receive somebody's affection, they must assimilate into that person's society. In the story, Jay Gatsby pursues the American dream and his passion for being happy only to come to a tragedy and total loss.
On one level The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald comments on the careless gaiety and moral decadence of the period in which it was set. It contains innumerable references to the contemporary scene. The wild extravagance of Gatsby's parties, the shallowness and aimlessness of the guests and the hint of Gatsby's involvement in crime all identify the period and the American setting. But as a piece of social commentary The Great Gatsby also describes the failure of the American dream, from the point of view that American political ideals conflict with the actual social conditions that exist. For whereas American democracy is based on the idea of equality among people, the truth is that social discrimination still exists and the divisions among the classes cannot be overcome. Myrtle's attempt to break into the group to which the Buchanans belong is doomed to fail. Taking advantage of her vivacity, her lively nature, she seeks to escape from her own class. She enters into an affair with Tom and takes on his way of living. But she only becomes vulgar and corrupt like the rich. She scorns people from her own class and loses all sense of morality. And for all her social ambition, Myrtle never succeeds in her attempt to find a place for herself in Tom's class. When it comes to a crisis, the rich stand together against all outsiders.
F. Scott Fitzgerald presents a scathing critique of upper class privilege in The Great Gatsby. Jay Gatsby’s library in particular, illustrates his fundamental misunderstanding of the self-perpetuating class society in 1920s America. It is a novel about surveillance: the ruling class constantly monitors the system; Gatsby is identified as the usurping “Other” who threatens their status, and must be put back in his rightful place.
In The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald explores the idea of the American Dream as well as the portrayal of social classes. Fitzgerald carefully sets up his novel into distinct social groups but, in the end, each group has its own problems to contend with, leaving a powerful reminder of what a precarious place the world really is. By creating two distinct social classes ‘old money’ and ‘new money’, Fitzgerald sends strong messages about the elitism underlying and moral corruption society. The idea of the American dream is the ideal that opportunity is available to any American, allowing their highest aspirations and goals to be achieved. In the case of The Great Gatsby it centres on the attainment of wealth and status to reach certain positions in life,
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald took place in the 1920’s when the nation was undergoing rapid economic, political, and social change. Looking through different literary lenses the reader is able to see the effects of these rapid changes. The marxist lens reflects the gap between rich and poor while the feminist lens showcases the patriarchal society.
In conclusion, The Great Gatsby reveals the carelessness and shallowness of the characters in the upper class. Society is totally corrupted and the character’s lives revolve around the money and extravagant lifestyles. All of the characters are surrounded with expensive and unnecessary itms, which in turn, dulls their dream of actual success. Scott F. Fitzgerald provides a powerful and everlasting message of a corrupt, materialistic society and the effects that it has on the idea of the American dream.